, B IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./I.T.A. NO. 1642/AHD/2017 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2009-10) ITO WARD-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD / VS. M/S. KUNJ INFRA DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD. A/2, ARBUDA APARTMENT, NR. JAIN TEMPLE, NEHRUNAGAR CHAR RASTA, (CIRCLE), AMBAWADI, AHMEDABAD ./ ./PAN/GIR NO. : AAD CK2 832 J ( /APPELLANT ) .. ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : SHRI MUDIT NAGPAL, SR. DR / RESPONDENT BY: SHRI TEJ SHAH, AR !' /DATE OF HEARING 05/09/2019 #$!' / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 05/09/2019 %& /O R D E R PER MAHAVIR PRASAD- JM: THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN PREFERRED BY THE REVENUE AGAIN ST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A)-2/652/ITO WARD-2(1)(1)/2016-17 DATED 28. 04.2017 ARISING OUT OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 09.12.2016. 2. THE GROUND OF APPEAL RAISED BY THE REVENUE READS AS UNDER:- 1. THE LD. CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN LAW AND ON FACTS IN DELETING THE ADDITION U/S. 69A WITHOUT PROPERLY APPRECIATING THE FACTS OF THE CASE AND THE MATERIAL BROUGHT ON RECORD. 2. ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CAS E, THE LD. CIT(A) OUGHT TO HAVE UPHELD THE ORDER OF THE ASSESS ING OFFICER. ITA NO. 1642/AHD/2017 A.Y. 2009-10 2 3. IT IS, THEREFORE, PRAYED THAT THE ORDER OF THE L D. CIT(A) MAY BE SET ASIDE AND THAT OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER MAY BE RESTORED TO THE ABOVE EXTENT. 4. THE APPELLANT CRAVES LEAVE TO AMEND OR ALTER ANY GROUND OR ADD A NEW GROUND, WHICH MAY BE NECESSARY. 3. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, IT WAS SUBMITTED BY THE LD.AR FOR THE ASSESSEE THAT APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS HIT BY RECENTLY ISSUED CBDT CIRCULAR NO.17 OF 2019 DATED 08/08/2019 REVISING TH E PREVIOUS THRESHOLDS PERTAINING TO TAX EFFECTS. IT IS INTER ALIA NOTICED THAT THE CBDT VIDE INSTRUCTION NO. F. NO. 279/MISC/M-93/2018 -ITJ DT. 20/08/2019 HAS OBSERVED THAT CIRCULAR NO.17/2019 DA TED 08/08/2019 RELATING TO ENHANCEMENT OF MONETARY LIMITS IS ALSO APPLICABLE TO ALL PENDING APPEALS. AS PER AFORESAID CIRCULAR, ALL PE NDING APPEALS FILED BY REVENUE ARE LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED AS A MEASURE FOR REDUCING LITIGATION WHERE THE TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED THE PRESCRIBED MONETARY LIMIT WHICH IS NOW REVISED AT RS.50 LAKHS. IN THE INSTAN T CASE, THE TAX EFFECT ON THE DISPUTED ISSUES RAISED BY THE REVENUE IS STA TED TO BE NOT EXCEEDING RS.50 LAKHS AND THEREFORE APPEAL OF THE R EVENUE IS REQUIRED TO BE DISMISSED IN LIMINE . 4. THE LEARNED DR FOR THE REVENUE FAIRLY ADMITTED T HE APPLICABILITY OF THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 17 OF 2019. ACCORDINGLY, A PPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED AS NOT MAINTAINABLE. HOWEVER, IT WILL BE OPEN TO THE REVENUE TO SEEK RESTORATION OF ITS APPEAL ON SH OWING INAPPLICABILITY OF THE AFORESAID CBDT CIRCULAR IN ANY MANNER. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISM ISSED. SD/- SD/- (PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA) (MAHAVIR PRASAD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD: DATED 05/09/2019 TANMAY TRUE COPY THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 05/ 09/2019 ITA NO. 1642/AHD/2017 A.Y. 2009-10 3 / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- 1. / REVENUE 2. % / ASSESSEE 3. '( ! )! / CONCERNED CIT 4. )! - / CIT (A) 5. *+, ! ( , ' ( , -.%'% / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. ,/ 0 / GUARD FILE. BY ORDER / %& , 1 / - ' ( , -.%'% 2 1.DATE OF DICTATION ON 05.09.2019 (LOW TAX EFFECT FORMAT) 2.DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE TH E DICTATING MEMBER 05.09.2019 3.DATE ON WHICH THE APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR. P.S./P.S. 05.09.2019 4.DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER FOR PRONOUNCEMENT 05.09.2019 5.DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER COMES BACK TO THE SR .P.S./P.S 05.09.2019 6.DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE BENCH CLERK 06.09.2019 7.DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK . 8.THE DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE ASSTT. REG ISTRAR FOR SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER 9.DATE OF DESPATCH OF THE ORDER