Nav Prerna Society, Rewari V. CIT(Exemption), Chandigarh

ITA 1647/DEL/2023

AI Insights

The case involves Nav Prerna Society, which appealed against the decision of the CIT(Exemption), Chandigarh, denying their application for registration under section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(Exemption) had rejected the application due to the absence of the requisite submissions from the assessee, as they did not respond to a notice. The assessee contended that they did not receive the notice properly communicated, which led to the non-representation. The Tribunal, referencing a similar case, emphasized the importance of natural justice and the need for proper communication of notices, thereby setting aside the CIT(Exemption)'s order and remanding the matter for a fresh decision.

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 122205 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 month(s) 1 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 26-09-2023
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: E
• Next Hearing Date: 24-09-2023
• Assessment Year: misc
• Appeal Filed On: 25-05-2023
• Other Referred Cases: Sant Kabir Mahasabha vs The CIT(Exemption)
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: JATIN SAINI
• Keywords: Charitable institution; Principle of natural justice; Reasonable cause; Set aside
• Section: 80G

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI “E” BENCH: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.1647/Del/2023 [Assessment Year : NIL] Nav Prerna Society, Radha Swami Road, Sector-3, Huda, Rewari, Haryana-123401. PAN-AAATN9825G vs CIT(Exemption), Chandigarh. APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by Shri Jatin Saini, CA Respondent by Ms. Samita Singh, Sr.DR Date of Hearing 25.09.2023 Date of Pronouncement 27.09.2023 ORDER PER KUL BHARAT, JM : The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by Ld.CIT(Exemption), Chandigarh dated 08.05.2023 for the assessment year NIL. 2. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:- 1. “That the orders passed on 08.05.2023 vide Form 10AD (See rule 2C or 11AA or 17A) by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as the 'CIT(E)'], has been arbitrary and unjust in denying the registration application for registration u/s 80G(5) of the Act under section 80G ex-party without give proper opportunity through proper mode of communication. 2. That the learned CIT(E), Chandigarh has erred both in law and on facts in rejecting application for seeking registration U/S 80G(S) of the Act filed by the appellant Charitable Trust, solely on the basis of absence of the requisite submissions of the appellant in response to the letter issued by Ld. CIT(E) while the fact is that such letter was uploaded by Ld. CIT(E) only on E-Filling portal without communicating through registered E-Mail, SMS on registered mobile and /or postal service which is gross violation of natural justice. 3. That in any view of the facts and circumstances of the case of the appellant Charitable Trust it is entitled for grant of registration U/S 80G(5) of the Act, which be kindly granted. 4. The Appellant craves the leave to add, amend, alter and/or delete any of the above grounds of appeal at/or before the time of hearing as the circumstances of the case may require or justify.” 3. Facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the assessee filed an application for approval u/s 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”). The Assessing Officer (“AO”) issued notice to the assessee but there was no representation on behalf of the assessee. Therefore, Ld.CIT(E) rejected the application of the assessee. 4. Aggrieved against this, the assessee preferred appeal before this Tribunal. 5. At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee did not receive notice and there was a reasonable cause on failure to represent before Ld.CIT(E). He contended that an opportunity be provided to the assessee in the interest of natural justice. In this regard Ld. Counsel for the assessee has placed reliance on the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Sant Kabir Mahasabha vs The CIT(Exemption) in ITA No.84/Chd./2023 for Assessment Year 2022-23 order dated 23.08.2023. 6. On the other hand, Ld. Sr. DR opposed these submissions and supported the orders of the authorities below. Ld. Sr. DR contended that it was incumbent upon the assessee to answer the queries raised by the Ld.CIT(E) and Ld.CIT(E) is empowered to make such inquiry for verification of genuineness of the activities of the assessee. 7. We have heard Ld. Authorized Representatives of the parties and perused the material available on record. There is no dispute with regard that there was no effective representation on behalf of the assessee before Ld.CIT(E). Further, there is no dispute with regard to the fact that Ld.CIT(E) is empowered to make such inquiry to satisfy himself about the genuineness of this activity of the society/trust. Before granting approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act in the present case, however, Ld.CIT(E) is required to give adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee. To sub-serve the interest of principle of natural justice, we therefore, set aside the impugned order and restore the application of the assessee to the file of Ld.CIT(E) to decide it afresh. The assessee is hereby, directed not to seek adjournment without any reasonable cause. Grounds raised by the assessee are accordingly, allowed for statistical purposes. 8. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 27 th September, 2023. Sd/- Sd/- (SHAMIM YAHYA) (KUL BHARAT) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER * Amit Kumar * Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI