IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “B” DELHI BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.1664/DEL/2020 Assessment Year 2012-13 Daryab Singh S/o Nathi Village Bhulwana Hodal Palwal Vs. The Income Tax Officer Ward-1(2) Faridabad TAN/PAN: EQDPS5894B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Shri S.C. Singhal, CA Respondent by: Shri Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Sr.DR Date of hearing: 09 05 2023 Date of pronouncement: 09 05 2023 O R D E R PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, A.M.: T he capt ione d a ppeal has bee n file d by t he assess ee a gainst the order of the l d. C ommiss ione r of Income Ta x (A ppe als ), Far idaba d (‘C IT (A )’ i n s hor t) date d 28. 11. 20 19 a rising f rom the assess me nt orde r dat ed 22. 12. 20 17 pass ed by th e Assessing O fficer (A O ) unde r Sec ti on 14 4 r.w . s 147 of the Income T ax A ct, 1961 (t he A ct) con cerning A Y 2012-13. 2. T he grou nds of appea l ra ised b y the assesse e read as unde r: “ 1 . T h e l e a r n e d I T O a n d C I T ( A ) e r r e d i n i ni t i at i n g a nd a p p r o v i n g t h e r e a s s e s s m e nt p r o c e e d i ng s i n t hi s c a s e s im pl y o n t h e b a s i s of i n pu t of i nf o r m a t i o n f r o m D I ( I &C I ) o n 2 6 / 0 3/ 2 01 5 a nd t h e A O h ad r e c o r d e d t he r e a s o n s o n 28 / 07 / 2 01 6 a n d s ou gh t t h e ap pr o v a l f r o m J C IT / P r . C I T. It i s no t a c as e of l i v e l i n k . T h e e nqu i r y b e f o r e r e c o r d i ng o f r e a s o n s t o c o nv e r t t he i nf o r m a t i o n i nto r e as o n s to b e l i e v e i s t o t al l y m i s s in g in t h i s c a s e m a k i ng t he e n ti r e p r o c e s s I.T.A. No.1664/Del/2020 2 b a d i n l aw . 2 . T he s h ow c a us e n ot i c e d t 0 4 / 11 / 20 1 7 is s u e d by t he A O m e nt i o n o f a pp r o v al o f r e as o n s fr o m P r . C I T a n d no t f r o m A dd l . C I T. T he l a w r e q u i r e th e ap p r ov a l i n l e s s t h a n 4 y e a r s c a s e s f r o m A d d l . C I T o n ly . I n v i e w of d e c is i on s o f c o u r t s i nc l . 3 45 I T 22 3 ( D e l h i ) e t c , t he a p pr o v al i s no t a s p e r l aw an d b e h e ld as n o ap p r ova l a s p e r l aw u s 1 5 1. K i n d ly c a n c e l t h e e nt i r e pr oc e e d in g s w i t ho ut pr op e r a p pr o v al . 3 . T h e l a nd s o l d i s l oc a t e d i n v i l l a ge B h ul w an a, T eh . H o da l , D i s t t . P a l w a l i n H a r y a na . A s p e r c e r t i f ic a t e f r o m H o da l R ev e n u e P a t w a r i d t 9/ 0 5/ 2 0 18 , i t i s l o c a te d 2 35 0 m e te r s f r o m H o da l N a g ar P a r i s h a d B o r d e r an d w a s a n a gr i c u l t ur al l a n d . A s p e r pr i n t o ut f r o m l a s t c e n s u s 2 0 1 1 d at a a v a i l ab l e , t he p o pu l a t i o ns o f v i l lag e B hu l w a n a w a s 7 0 8 1 p e r s o n s . Th e c e r t i f i c at e o bt a i ne d b y A O d ef in e d t he B h ul w a na v i l l ag e B or de r f r o m H o d al M u ni c i pa l l i m i t a n d n o t t he d i s t a nc e o f p l o t i n q ue s ti o n . 4 . S e c t i on 2 (1 4 ) ( i i i ) o f I T A c t , 1 9 61 d e f i n e s a g r i cul t u r a l l a n d. A s p e r c l a us e ( a ) t he a s s e s s e e f ul f i l al l t he c o nd i t ion s no t e d t h e r e in . T he I d C I T (A ) h a s r e f e r r e d t o a n o t i f i c a t i on a p p l i cab l e f or a p e r i o d p r i o r t o 0 1/ 0 4/ 2 0 1 4 a nd h e s a y s i t s pe c i f y a d i s ta n c e of 5 k m i n c a s e o f H o d al . It a m o u nt s t o m a k i ng a r ul e ove r t he l aw a s m ad e by t h e P ar l i a m e n t . 5 . Th e c o s t of a c q u i s i t io n a n d i t s i nd e x i n g m us t a lw ay s b e r e d u c e d f r o m s a l e c o n s i de r a t i on t o f i nd ou t t a x a b l e l on g t er m c a pi t a l g a in . A l a nd s o l d f or 1. 6 0 C r / 1 . 44 C r in 2 01 1 h as be e n f ou nd by A O /C I T (A ) h a v i ng z e r o c os t a s o n 1 . 1. 1 9 84 . T hi s s h ow s l i m i ta t i on o f t he i r i m a g in a t io n . The C I T (A ) ha s f a i l e d t o a dj ud ic a t e t hi s i s s ue i n hi s o r d e r . In c as e o l de r l a nd / pr o p e r t y , t he r e a re s t a nd a r d p r o c e du r e s / v a l ue r s w ho g i v e f a i r m ar k e t p r i c e o n t ha t d at e s . B o t h l o w e r a u t ho r i t i e s h a v e f ai l e d i n t h e i r d u t i e s t o f in d t h e s a m e an d in n o t a l l ow i n g a de d u c t i o n t o a pp e l l a n t . 6 . T he s t a m p d ut y v a l ue of R s . 1 , 60 , 8 0, 5 00 i s c h al l en ge a bl e by the a s s e s s e e u /s . 5 0C (2 ) an d t he c l a i m fo r t h e s a m e w a s m ad e t o t he t r a n s ac t i o n v al u e a t R s . 1 , 4 4 , 8 0 , 00 0 . N o s t e p w a s ta k e n by e it h e r o f l ow e r a u t h o r i t i e s t o v e r i fy t h e c la i m a nd h a s b ee n s u m m ar i l y r e j e c t e d w i t h ou t op p or t u n it y o r d i s c us s i o n . T h i s i s n o t j u s t i f i e d a nd b a d i n l aw . 7 . Th e s al e i n t hi s c a s e i s n o t c o m p l e t e a s s e v e r a l c he q ue s b e i ng a p a r t o f s a l e c on s i d e r a ti o n i s s u e d by bu y e r t o s e l l er ha v e b ou n c e d a n d t h e l i t i g at i on b e t w e e n s e l l e r a n d b uy e r f o r t he s a m e i s p e nd i n g i n c o u r t s . Wi t h ou t s al e c on s i d e r at i o n a n d p a r t i c u l ar l y w h e n t he b u y e r i n d e n y i n g t h e b al a n c e pa y m e n t , t h e s a l e t r a ns ac t i o n i s n ot c o m p l e te . Le v y i ng t a x o n L TG C w h i c h h a s n o t r e a c he d t h e s e l l e r , a n d i s n o w d ou b t fu l , i s n o t c o r r e c t . ” I.T.A. No.1664/Del/2020 3 3. When the matter w as calle d fo r hearin g, the ld. couns el for the assesse e inte r alia s ubmit ted t hat the cas e of t he as sessee w as re opene d u nder Secti on 14 8 r. w. Sectio n 147 of the A ct on the gro und t ha t asses see has s old cer tain la nd pa rce l to one M /s. Cre at ive D rea m Devel ope rs P vt. L td. fo r considera tion of Rs. 1, 44, 80, 000/-. I t is further st ated in t he aforesa id re asons that the fair ma rket value as per s ta mp dut y v al ua tion stands at Rs. 160, 87, 500/ - on s uch l and a nd t he as sesse e has not f il ed the re tu rn of i nc ome and consequ entl y th e taxa bl e inc ome has escape d inco me. I n the m att er, the l d. cou nsel submi tt ed that t he s al e proceeds of t he land is e xempted under Sec tion 10(37) of t he A ct and there fore, th e sale pr oc eeds are not t axab le unde r the pro visions of the A ct. H ence, the re is no es capement of an y char gea bl e income on the pa rt of the assesse e. C onsequent ly, the reas o ns so rec or ded are inhe re ntl y incorr ec t and w ithout sat is f yi ng the re qui re me nt o f escapement of char gea bl e income. T he ld. counse l t hus urg ed for quashing t he reas ons re cor ded. O n bei ng inqui re d b y the B ench on the evidenc e i n re lat i on to the exe mpt i on cla imed, the asses see fair ly sub mi tt ed tha t s uc h evi dences w ere not pl ace d bef ore t he A O . 4. U nder the circums tances proj ecte d on beha lf of the ass essee that wh ere the as sessee has hois te d a na rra tive that t he inc ome under referenc e i n the reas ons are t otal l y exempt from ta xati on, w e cons ide r i t just and expedient t o re mi t the mat ter back to the fi le of t he Asses si ng O ffi cer. T he as sessee sh al l produce all the re le vant evi dences before t he A ssessing Of fice r t o asse rt his c la i m that th e impugn ed i nc ome is exe mp t from taxat ion u nder the pro visions of t he A ct. O n co nsi derati on of evid ences, the A ssessi ng Of fi ce r shal l pr oc eed in accorda nce w it h law and on I.T.A. No.1664/Del/2020 4 bein g satis fi ed, shall drop t he re-ass ess ment proceed ings. It s ha ll be open to A O to ma ke su ch enqui r y as it ma y cons ider ne cessa r y to apprec iate the facts i n pe rspec ti ve . H ow ever, for a ny re aso n th e proceed ings a re c onti nued, p roper opportunit y s hall be gi ven to the ass essee t o j u sti f y his case on mer its. N eedless t o sa y, the assessee shall a s sist t he Asse ssin g O fficer and attend the proceed ings wi thout a ny de mu r. T he A ssess ing O ff icer shall pro vi de reasona ble o pportunit y t o the asse ssee an d pas s orde r in accorda nce w ith la w . 5. In the r esu lt, the appeal of t he a ssessee is allow ed f or sta tis ti ca l purpos es . Order was pronounced in the open Court on 09/05/2023 Sd/- Sd/- [CHANDRA MOHAN GARG] [PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: /05/2023 prabhat