SMT BEENA RAJEN SHAH, MUMBAI V. INCOME TAX OFFICER-19(1)(2), MUMBAI

ITA 1681/MUM/2023

AI Insights

Smt. Beena Rajan Shah appealed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), which had restricted the deduction of interest under section 24(b) of the Income Tax Act to Rs. 2,00,000, whereas she claimed Rs. 7,14,855. The Assessing Officer had initially disallowed the entire claim due to insufficient substantiation, but the CIT(A) partially allowed it by reducing the disallowance to Rs. 5,14,855. The Tribunal, after reviewing the documentary evidence provided by the assessee, which included rental agreements and bank statements, concluded that the property was indeed let out and the interest on the loan taken for the property was a legitimate deduction against the rental income.

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 300186 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 month(s) 18 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 02-08-2023
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 20-08-2023
• Assessment Year: 2016-2017
• Appeal Filed On: 14-05-2023
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: R.M. BRINDHA
• Assessee Lawyers: SHREYA GOSAVI
• Section: 143(3); 250; 143(2)

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 1681/Mum/2023 (A.Y: 2016-17) Smt.Beena Rajesh Shah, C/2, 454, 6 th Floor, Matru Ashish, Nepean Sea Road, Mumbai-400006, Maharastra. Vs. ITO – 19(1)(2), Matru Mandir, Tardeo Road, Mumbai-400007. PAN/GIR No. : AAGPS8608G Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Ms.Shreya Gosavi.AR Respondent by : Ms. R.M. Brindha.DR Date of Hearing 21.08.2023 Date of Pronouncement 22.08.2023 आदेश / O R D E R PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE JM: The assessee has filed the appeal against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi/ CIT(A) passed u/s 143(3) and 250 of the Act. 2. At the time of hearing, the Ld.AR of the assessee submitted that there is a delay in filing the appeal before the Hon’ble Tribunal and filed an affidavit for condonation of delay. Whereas, the facts mentioned in the affidavit are reasonable and the Ld.DR has no ITA No. 1681/Mum/2023 Smt Beena Rajan Shah, Mumbai. - 2 - specific objections. Accordingly, condone the delay and admit the appeal. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: 1. The Learned CIT(A)/NFAC erred in restricting deduction of interest u/s 24(b) to Rs 2,00,000/- while computing Income f rom House Property instead of allowing deduction of Rs 7,14,855/- as claimed by the Assessee without appreciating that the restriction of Rs 2,00,000/- is applicable to only self occupied properties and not let out properties and hence deduction of interest of Rs 7,14,855 may be allowed. 2. The Appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter or delete any or all the above grounds of appeal. 3. The brief facts of the case that, the assessee is an individual and derives income from house property and income from other sources. The assessee has filed the return of income for the A.Y 2016-17 on 30.03.2017 disclosing a total income of Rs. 8,38,780/-. Subsequently the case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and notice u/s 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act along with questionnaire was issued. ITA No. 1681/Mum/2023 Smt Beena Rajan Shah, Mumbai. - 3 - In compliance to the notice, the assessee has submitted the details from time to time through ITBA Portal. On perusal of the financial statements, the Assessing Officer(AO) found that the assessee has disclosed the income from house property of Rs.2,80,000/- and has claimed interest on borrowings u/s 24(b) of the Act of Rs. 7,14,855/- and claimed set off of losses of Rs. 5,18,865/-. The AO in order to verify the genuineness of the claim, has called the assessee to submit the details of rental/lease agreement and certificate in respect of claim of interest. The assessee has submitted the rental agreements and the AO found that the property was let out to her family members and the assessee has claimed interest on loan from rental income. The A.O dealt on the facts, information and provisions of the Act at page 2 & 3 of the order and is of the opinion that the claim is not substantiated with the complete details and has disallowed the interest claim of Rs.7,14,855/- and assessed the total income of Rs. 15,53,640/- and passed the order u/s 143(3) of the Act dated 28.12.2018. ITA No. 1681/Mum/2023 Smt Beena Rajan Shah, Mumbai. - 4 - 4. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee has filed an appeal before the CIT(A), whereas the CIT(A) considered the grounds of appeal, submissions of the assessee and findings of the AO and has restricted the disallowance of interest to the extent of Rs. 5,14,855/- and partly allowed the assessee appeal. Aggrieved by the CIT(A)order, the assessee has filed an appeal before the Hon’ble Tribunal. 5. At the time of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the CIT(A) erred in not considering the facts that the assessee has obtained loan for the house property acquisition and interest on loan is claimed as deduction against the rental income of the property and these facts and information were filed before the lower authorities and the Ld.AR substantiated the submissions with the paper book and prayed for allowing the appeal. Contra, the Ld. DR relied on the order of the CIT(A). 6. Heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The sole grievance of the assessee as envisaged by the Ld. AR that the CIT(A) has erred ITA No. 1681/Mum/2023 Smt Beena Rajan Shah, Mumbai. - 5 - in restring the disallowance of interest of Rs. 5,14,855/-. The contentions of the Ld. AR that the assessee has substantiated the claim before the lower authorities with the documentary evidence and in the earlier years also the assessee has offered the rental income and claimed interest on loan. The Ld. AR also emphasized that the CIT(A) though accepted the facts and details but has allowed the claim of interest to the extent of Rs. 2 lakhs only. Whereas on verification of the facts and information in the paper book at Page 6 to 78 , the assessee has submitted the rental agreement, copy of ledger accounts, bank statements, loan against the fixed deposits and interest certificate and the assessee has let out the property to various tenants and has been offering the rental income and claimed interest on loans and the lower authorities have overlooked the genuineness of the interest expenditure claimed duly supported by the material evidences. Considering the facts, circumstances and submissions and there is no dispute that the assessee has let out the property and derived the rental income and the assessee has substantiated the submissions with the documentary ITA No. 1681/Mum/2023 Smt Beena Rajan Shah, Mumbai. - 6 - evidences before the lower authorities and the CIT(A) has accepted the details but granted partial relief Accordingly, set aside the order of the CIT(A) on the present disputed issue and direct the Assessing officer to delete the disallowance of interest and allow the grounds of appeal in favour of the assessee. 7. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 22.08.2023. Sd/- (PAVAN KUMAR GADALE) JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai, Dated .08.2023 KRK, PS Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT (Judicial) 4. The PCIT 5. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. Guard File आदेशान ु सार/ BY ORDER, //True Copy/ ITA No. 1681/Mum/2023 Smt Beena Rajan Shah, Mumbai. - 7 - 1. ( Asst. Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai 2. Other Member