DCIT, New Delhi V. Mr. Rohit Kumar Bansal, Gurgaon

ITA 1694/DEL/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2019] 115 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8984 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 6 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 01-10-2019
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 31-03-2016
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: DR VIJAY KR CHADHA
• Keywords: Retrospective amendment; Tax effect; Set aside

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH D : NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 1694/DEL./2016 (A.Y. : 2012-13) DCIT, VS. MR. ROHIT KUMAR BANSA L CIRCLE 13(1), VILLA NO. 179, TATVAM VILLA NEW DELHI. VIPUL WORLD, SECTOR-48, GURGAON -122018 (PAN : ALMPB9018Q) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : SH. V. RAJA KUMAR, ADV. REVENUE BY : DR. VIJAY KR. CHADHA, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING : 26.09.2019 DATE OF ORDER : 01.10.2019 O R D E R PER KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER : APPELLANT, DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCL E 13(1), NEW DELHI (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE REVENUE ) BY FILING THE PRESENT APPEAL SOUGHT TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORD ER DATED 25.01.2016 PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TA X (APPEALS)- 5, NEW DELHI QUA THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2012-13. 2. PERUSAL OF THE AFORESAID APPEAL FILED BY THE RE VENUE APPARENTLY SHOW THAT THE SAME IS HAVING LOW TAX EFF ECT AS PER CBDT CIRCULAR NO.17/2019 DATED 8 TH AUGUST, 2019 VIDE WHICH THE ITA NO.1694/DEL./2016 2 REVENUE HAS BEEN DIRECTED NOT TO PREFER ANY APPEAL IN CASE THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN RS.50,00,000/- AND THIS FACTUAL POSITION HAS BEEN FAIRLY CONCEDED BY THE LD. D.R. THE LD. A.R. CONTE NDED THAT THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE MAY BE DISMISSED IN THE LIGHT OF CBDT CIRCULAR (SUPRA). 3. WE HAVE HEARD THE PARTIES ON THE ISSUE IN CONTR OVERSY AND PERUSED THE MATERIAL ON RECORD. PERUSAL OF CBDT CIR CULAR (SUPRA) SHOWS THAT MONETARY LIMIT FOR FILING THE APPEAL BY THE DEPARTMENT BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, HON'BLE HIGH COURT AND HON'BLE SUPREME COURT HAS BEEN REVISED. 4. IN VIEW OF THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO.17/2019 DATED 8 TH AUGUST, 2019 HAVING RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT AS COORDINATE BENC H OF THE TRIBUNAL IN CASE OF DINESH MADHAVLAL PATEL [TS-469-ITAT- 2019(AHD)] 2019-TIOL-1556-ITAT-AHM DATED 14 TH AUGUST, 2019 HAS ALREADY DECIDED THE ISSUE AS TO THE APPLICABILI TY OF THE CAPTIONED CIRCULAR TO THE PENDING APPEALS IN AFFIRM ATIVE AND WHAT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED ABOVE, WE ARE OF THE CONSIDERED VIEW THAT THE AFORESAID APPEAL IS NOT MAINTAINABLE BECAUSE OF LO W TAX EFFECT I.E. LESS THAN RS.50,00,000/- HENCE, THE AFORESAID APPEA L FILED BY THE REVENUE IS HEREBY DISMISSED HAVING BEEN BECOME INF RUCTUOUS. HOWEVER, IN CASE, THE PRESENT APPEAL IS FOUND TO BE MAINTAINABLE AT ITA NO.1694/DEL./2016 3 ANY STAGE FOR ANY TECHNICAL REASONS, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO SEEK RECALL OF THIS ORDER UNDER RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF LAW. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON THIS 1 ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019. SD/- SD/- (N.K.BILLAIYA) (KULDIP SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED : THE 1 ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BR COPY FORWARDED TO: 1.APPELLANT 2.RESPONDENT 3.CIT 4.CIT(A)-5, NEW DELHI. 5.CIT(ITAT), NEW DELHI. AR, ITAT NEW DELHI. DATE OF DICTATION 26/09/2019 DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER 26/09/2019 DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE THE OTHER MEMBER DATE ON WHICH THE APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR. PS/PS DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER FOR PRONOUNCEMENT DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER COMES BACK TO THE SR. PS/PS DATE ON WHICH THE FINAL ORDER IS UPLOADED ON THE WEBSITE OF ITAT DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE BENCH CLERK DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK THE DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR FOR SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER DATE OF DISPATCH OF THE ORDER