IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD D BENCH AHMEDABAD BEFORE, SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI S. S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 170/AHD/2015 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2010-11) HENIL K. PATEL PROP. SHREENATHJI INDUSTRIES, PLOT NO. 3409, PHASE IV, GIDC VATVA, AHMEDABAD 382445 APPELLA NT VS. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE 6, 5 TH FLOOR, PRATYAKSH KAR BHAVAN, AMBAWADI, AHMEDABAD - 380015 RESPONDENT PAN: AFUPP7791N /BY ASSESSEE : NONE /BY REVENUE : SHRI V. K. SINGH, SR. D.R /DATE OF HEARING : 20.12.2017 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 22.12.2017 ORDER PER S. S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER THIS ASSESSEES APPEAL FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11 ARISES AGAINST THE CIT(A)-XI, AHMEDABADS ORDER DATED 23.09.2014 IN CA SE NO. CIT(A)- XI/9/ACIT.CIR-6/13-14, IN PROCEEDINGS U/S. 143(3) O F THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961; IN SHORT THE ACT. 2. CASE CALLED TWICE. NONE PRESENT AT ASSESSEES BE HEST. LEARNED COUNSEL REPRESENTING ASSESSEE HAD SOUGHT ADJOURNMENT ON THE LAST DATE OF HEARING AS WELL ITA NO. 170/AHD/15 [HENIL K. PATEL VS. ACIT] A.Y. 2010-11 - 2 - ON 20.12.2017. THE CASE WAS THEN ADJOURNED FOR TOD AY. ON THE DATE OF HEARING NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF ASSESSEE. THIS PRIMA FA CIE SHOWS THAT ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THESE APPEALS. IN VIEW OF THESE FACTS, IT IS CLEAR THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THIS APPE AL, AND ACCORDINGLY, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE MULTIPLAN (INDIA) (P) LTD., (38 ITD 320), WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY ASSESSEE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3. THIS ASSESSEES APPEAL IS ACCORDINGLY DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION. [PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS THE 22 ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017.] SD/- SD/- ( PRAMOD KUMAR ) (S. S. GODARA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEM BER AHMEDABAD: DATED 22/12/2017 TRUE COPY S.K.SINHA / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- / REVENUE 2 / ASSESSEE ! / CONCERNED CIT 4 !- / CIT (A) ( )*+ ,--. . /0 / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 1 +23 / GUARD FILE. BY ORDER / . // . /0