IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD BENCH B AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI BHAAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI D.C.AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.1714/AHD/2009 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2004-05 DATE OF HEARING:23.3.11 DRAFTED:25.3.11 DHOLU KCL VENTURES CO.S-1-A, MARLIDHAR COMPLEX, OPP. SNEHKUNJ SOCIETY, SM. ROAD, AMBAWADI, AHMEDABAD PAN NO.AAEFD2105K V/S . INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-10(3), AHMEDABAD (APPELLANT) .. (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY :- NONE RESPONDENT BY:- SHRI S.K. JHA, SR-DR O R D E R PER D.C. AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:- THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS AGAINST THE ORDER O F LD. CIT(APPEALS)-XVI, AHMEDABAD DATED 25-03-2009. 2. AT THE OUTSET, IT IS NOTICED THAT THE ASSESSEE H AS BEEN ISSUED A NOTICE OF HEARING FIXING THE HEARING FOR 23-03-2011 BUT THE NOTICE RETURNED UNSERVED WITH THE POSTAL AND THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT GIVEN ANY NEW ADDRESS. ACCORDINGLY, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THE ASSESSEE SEEMS NOT INTERESTED IN ATTENDING THE HEARING FOR PROSECU TION OF APPEAL. ITA NO.1714/AHD/2009 A.Y. 2004-05 DHOLU KCL VENTURES CO. V. ITO WD-10(3), ABD PAGE 2 ACCORDINGLY, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED FOR NON PROSECUTION AT THE END OF THE ASSESSEE. 3. IN VIEW OF THIS FACTS, IT IS CLEAR THAT THE ASSE SSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THIS APPEAL, AND IS ACCORDINGLY, FOL LOWING THE DECISION OF THE MULTIPLAN (INDIA) (P) LTD., (38 ITD 320) , WE DISMISS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT, ASSESSEES APPEAL IS DISMISSED FOR NON- PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 23/03/2011 SD/- SD/- (BHAVNESHSAINI) ( D.C.AGARWAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD, DATED : 23/03/2011 *DKP COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. THE APPELLANT. 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT(APPEALS)-XVI, AHMEDABAD 4. THE CIT CONCERNS. 5. THE DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER, /TRUE COPY/ DEPUTY / ASSTT.REGISTRAR ITAT, AHMEDABAD