IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH A, HYDERABAD (THROUGH VIRTUAL HEARING) BEFORE SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 1728/HYD/2017 A.Y. 2013 - 14 B. SEENAIAH, HYDERABAD. PAN: ADAPB 6173 G VS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(3), HYDERABAD. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY: SHRI SATYA DINAKAR REVENUE BY: SHRI DIPAK R DR DATE OF HEARING: 11/03/2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 18 /03/2021 ORDER PER A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, A.M: THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A) - 1, HYDERABAD IN APPEAL NO. 0180/CIT(A) - 1/HYD/2016 - 17/2017 - 18, DATED 25/07/2017 PASSED U/S. 143(3) R.W.S 250(6) OF THE ACT FOR THE A.Y. 2013 - 14. 2. AT THE OUTSET, LD. AR SUBMITTED BEFORE US THAT THE ASSESSEE DESIRES TO AVAIL VIVAD SE VISWAS SCHEME FOR THE A.Y. 2013 - 14 . HE FURTHER SUBMITTED THAT, THE ASSESSEE COULD NOT FILE FORM NO.1 & 2 DUE TO PAUCITY 2 OF TIME, HOWEVER HE ASSURED THE BENCH THAT THE FORM NO.1&2 SHALL BE FILED SHORTLY. 3. THE LD. DR SUBMITTED THAT IF THE ASSESSEE DESIRES TO AVAIL THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SC HEME, THE REVENUE HAS NO OBJECTION. 4. HAVING HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE, WE ARE INCLINED TO TREAT THE INSTANT APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE AS WITHDRAWN RELYING ON THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS IN THE CASE OF DCIT VS. M/S . KEYARAM HOTELS P. LTD IN T.C.A. NO. 694 OF 2019, DATED 13/10/2020 WHEREIN IT WAS HELD AS UNDER: - 3. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT / ASSESSEE, ON INSTRUCTIONS, SUBMITTED THAT THE RESPONDENT / ASSESSEE INTENDS TO AVAIL THE BENEFIT OF VIVAD SE VI SHWAS SCHEME (VVS SCHEME FOR BREVITY) AND IN THIS REGARD, THE ASSESSEE IS TAKING STEPS TO FILE THE APPLICATION / DECLARATION IN FORM NO.1. . .. 7. AS OBSERVED, THE ASSESSEE IS GIVEN LIBERTY TO RESTORE THIS APPEAL IN THE EVENT THE ULTIMATE DECISION T O BE TAKEN ON THE DECLARATION TO BE FILED BY THE ASSESSEE UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE SAID ACT IS NOT IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE. IF SUCH A PRAYER IS MADE, THE REGISTRY SHALL ENTERTAIN THE PRAYER WITHOUT INSISTING UPON ANY APPLICATION TO BE FILED FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN RESTORATION OF THE APPEAL AND ON SUCH REQUEST MADE BY THE ASSESSEE BY FILING A MISCELLANEOUS PETITION FOR RESTORATION, THE REGISTRY SHALL PLACE SUCH PETITION BEFORE THE DIVISION BENCH FOR ORDERS. 8. IN THE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE, WE DIRECT THE RES PONDENT / ASSESSEE TO FILE FORM NO.1 ON OR BEFORE 09/11/2020 AND THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY HTTP://WWW.JUDIS.NIC.IN5/6 T.C.A.NO.694 OF 2019. 3 ACCORDINGLY, WE HEREBY DISMISS THE INSTANT APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE FOR THE A.Y. 2013 - 14 AS WITHDRAWN. HOWEVER, WE ALSO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT, IF THE ASSESSEES CASE IS NOT ACCEPTED IN THE VIVAD - SE - VISHWAS SCHEME BY THE REVENUE FOR WHATSOEVER MAY BE REASON ON A SUBSEQUENT DATE, THEN THE ASSESSEE SHALL BE AT LIBE RTY TO FILE MISCELLANEOUS PETITION BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL WITHIN THE TIME LIMIT PRESCRIBED UNDER THE ACT TO REINSTATE HIS APPEAL. IT IS ORDERED ACCORDINGLY. 5. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 18 TH MARCH, 2021. SD/ - SD/ - ( SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI ) ( A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER HYDERABAD, DATED: 18 TH MARCH, 2021. OKK COPY TO: - 1) B. SEENAIAH C/O. M. ANJANEYULU & CO., CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS, 30, BHAGYALAKSHMI NAGAR, GANDHI NAGAR, HYDERABAD 500 080. 2) DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(3), HYDERABAD. 3) THE CIT (A) - 1, HYDEABAD. 4) THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1, HYDERABAD. 5) THE DR, ITAT, HYDERABAD 6) GUARD FILE