, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , B B ENCH, CHENNAI . , ' # . $ , & ' BEFORE SHRI A.MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, JUDICI AL MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO.1745/MDS/2016 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2012-13) MR. VINEET KUMAR JAIN, 25, VEPERY HIGH ROAD, PERIAMET, CHENNAI-600 003. VS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-2(2), CHENNAI PAN: AADPV8852E ( /APPELLANT) ( /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : NONE /RESPONDENT BY : MS. C.YAMUNA, JCIT /DATE OF HEARING : 8 TH DECEMBER, 2016 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 8 TH DECEMBER, 2016 / O R D E R PER A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, AM:- THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-1 6, CHENNAI DATED 09.03.2016 IN ITA NO.80/2012-13/CIT(A)-16 PASSED UNDER SECTION 156 R.W.S. 250(6) OF THE ACT. 2. INITIALLY, THE APPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 0 6.09.2016, HOWEVER THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED TO 08.12.2016 AT THE REQUEST OF THE LEARNED AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. HOWEVER ON 08.12.2016, N ONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE, NOR ANY REQUEST FOR ADJOURN MENT WAS FILED. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, WE ARE OF THE CONSIDERED OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL F ILED BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL. HENCE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DEL HI BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT V. MULTIPLAN INDIA P. LTD., REPORTED IN 38 I TD 320 AND THE 2 ITA NO.1745/MDS/2016 JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAOHOLKAR (223 ITR 480), WE HEREBY DISMI SS THE APPEAL IN LIMINE . 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE 8 TH DECEMBER, 2016 SD/- SD/- ( ' # . $ ) ( . ) ( DUVVURU RL REDDY ) ( A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY ) # % / JUDICIAL MEMBER % / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER # /CHENNAI, ( /DATED 8 TH DECEMBER, 2016 SOMU *+ ,+ /COPY TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. - () /CIT(A) 4. - /CIT 5. + 1 /DR 6. /GF