IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD A BENCH BEFORE: SHRI MUKUL KR. SHRAWAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI N.S. SAINI, ACCOUN TANT MEMBER SHRI NANUBHAI LALJIBHAI THAKKER PROP: M/S VISHAL ENTERPRISES 8, BHAVANI ESTATE, SARKHEJ, AHMEDABAD PAN: AASPT 6631 Q (APPELLANT) VS INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-7(1), AHMEDABAD REVENUE BY: SHRI DINESH SINGH, SR. D.R. ASSESSEE BY: NONE DATE OF HEARING : 05-02-2015 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 13-02- 2015 / ORDER PER : MUKUL KR. SHRAWAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ARISING FR OM THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-VI, AHMEDABAD DATED 06-05-2011 FOR A.Y. 2007-08. ITA NO. 1768/AHD/2011 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08 I.T.A NO. 1768/AHD/2011 A.Y. 20007-08 PAGE NO NANUBHAI LALJIBHAI THAKKER VS. ITO 2 2. A NOTICE HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE REGISTRY ON 10/0 1/2015 TO THE ASSESSEE, FIXING THE DATE OF HEARING 05/02/2015 BUT NO ONE HAS APPEARED. UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES, WE HAVE NO OPTION BUT TO D ISMISS THIS APPEAL SINCE THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING WITH ITS APPEAL. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF HON'BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH C OURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKA VS. CWT (1997) 223 I TR 480 (M.P.) AND OF HONBLE DELHI TRIBUNAL DECISION IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (PVT) LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DELHI) , WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON THE DATE MENTIONE D HEREINABOVE AT CAPTION PAGE SD/- SD/- (N.S. SAINI) (MUKUL KR. SHRAWAT) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD : DATED 13/02/2015 AK / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- 1. ASSESSEE 2. REVENUE 3. CONCERNED CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER/ , / ,