IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH DELHI BENCH DELHI BENCH DELHI BENCH E EE E NEW DELHI NEW DELHI NEW DELHI NEW DELHI BEFORE : BEFORE : BEFORE : BEFORE : SHRI SHRI SHRI SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI BHAVNESH SAINI BHAVNESH SAINI BHAVNESH SAINI, , , , JUDICIAL MEMBER & JUDICIAL MEMBER & JUDICIAL MEMBER & JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. ITA NO. ITA NO. ITA NO. 1791 1791 1791 1791/DEL./2015 /DEL./2015 /DEL./2015 /DEL./2015 ASSTT. YEAR : ASSTT. YEAR : ASSTT. YEAR : ASSTT. YEAR : 20 2020 200 00 08 88 8- -- -09 0909 09 MANSI SEHKARI AWAS SAMITI LTD. VS. ADDL. CIT C/O. AKHILESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE, RANGE-1 CHAMBER NO. 206-07, ANSAL SATYAM, RDC RAJ NAGAR GHAZIABAD GHAZIABAD (PAN: AACTM8741Q) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : MS. S.R.SENAPATI, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING : 15.03.2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 15.03.2018 ORDER ORDER ORDER ORDER PER L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 12.01.2015 PASSED BY LEARNED CIT(A)- GHAZIABAD FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008- 09. 2. THE NOTICE FOR HEARING ON 15.03.2018 HAD BEEN SE NT BY THE SPEED POST ON THE GIVEN ADDRESS BY THE ASSESSEE AT SERIAL NO. 10 OF FORM NO. 36 WHICH HAS BEEN RETURNED UNSERVED BY THE POSTAL AUTHORITY. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, NO ONE WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AND NO RE QUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT HAS ALSO COME ON RECORD. THEREFORE, IT CAN BE SAFELY INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS ITA NO. 1791/DEL./2015 2 NOT SERIOUS IN PURSUING ITS APPEAL. IN THE CIRCUMST ANCES, THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE LEFT WITH US IS TO DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESS EE IN LIMINE. SUPPORT IS DRAWN FROM THE ORDER OF TRIBUNAL IN CIT VS. MULTI PLAN IN DIA (P) LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL.) AND OF M.P. HIGH COURT IN ESTATE OF LATE TUK OJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP). 3. BEFORE PARTING, WE THINK IT APPROPRIATE TO ADD T HAT IN CASE THE ASSESSEE IS ABLE TO SHOW REASONABLE CAUSE FOR NON-REPRESENTA TION ON THE DATE OF HEARING, THEN IT MAY, IF SO ADVISED, PRAY FOR RECAL L OF THIS ORDER AND DECISION ON MERITS. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED. ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 15.03.20 18. SD/- SD/- ( (( (BHAVNESH SAINI BHAVNESH SAINI BHAVNESH SAINI BHAVNESH SAINI) ) ) ) (L.P. SAHU) (L.P. SAHU) (L.P. SAHU) (L.P. SAHU) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED : 15.03.2018 *BINITA* COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: (1) THE APPELLANT (2) THE RESPONDENT (3) COMMISSIONER (4) CIT(A) (5) DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE (6) GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASSISTANT. REGISTRAR INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES, NEW DELHI ITA NO. 1791/DEL./2015 3 DATE INITIAL 1. DRAFT DICTATED ON 15 .0 3 .2018 PS 2. DRAFT PLACED BEFORE AUTHOR 15 .0 3 .2018 PS 3. DRAFT PROPOSED & PLACED BEFORE THE SECOND MEMBER JM/AM 4. DRAFT DISCUSSED/APPROVED BY SECOND MEMBER. JM/AM 5. APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR.PS/PS PS/PS 6. KEPT FOR PRONOUNCEMENT ON 15 .0 3 .2018 PS 7. FILE SENT TO THE BENCH CLERK 15 .0 3 .2018 PS 8. DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE AR 9. DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK. 10. DATE OF DISPATCH OF ORDER.