M/s. Lakhani Rubber Udyog Pvt. Ltd., Faridabad V. Addl. CIT, Faridabad

ITA 1795/DEL/2014

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 132 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7985 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 1 month(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 10-05-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Next Hearing Date: 10-05-2016
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 26-03-2014
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH D, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI J.S. REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NOS.1794 & 1795/DEL/2014 A.YRS. : 2008-09 & 2009-10 M/S LAKHANI RUBBER UDYOG PVT LTD., PLOT NO. 131, SECTOR-24, FARIDABAD (PANAAACL3111E) VS ADDL. CIT, RANGE-II, FARIDABAD (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE DEPARTMENT BY : SH. T. JAMES SINGSON, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING: 10.05.2016 DATE OF ORDER : 10-05-2016 ORDER PER H.S. SIDHU : JM THESE APPEALS ARE FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DIRECT ED AGAINST THE SEPARATE ORDERS BOTH DATED 16.1.2014 OF THE LD. C IT(A)-2, FARIDABAD RELEVANT TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09 & 2009-1 0. 2. IN THESE CASES THE NOTICE WERE SENT TO THE ASSESSE E FOR HEARING BY REGD. AD POST FOR TODAY I.E. 10.05.2016 AT THE ADDRESS MENTIONED IN FORM NO. 36 VIDE COLUMN NO. 10. 3. ON 10.05.2016, NEITHER THE ASSESSEE NOR ITS AUTHOR ISED REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDED THE HEARING AND ALSO NOT FILED ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT. IT IS THUS INFERRED T HAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTION OF ITS APPEALS. 4. HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES AND FOL LOWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL INC LUDING THAT OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. : 38 ITD 320 (DELHI) AND HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURTS DECISION IN ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJ IRAO HOLKAR VS. ITA NO. 1794&1795/DEL/2014 2 CWT; 223 ITR 480 (MP), WE TREAT THESE APPEALS AS UNAD MITTED AND DISMISS THE SAME. WE MAY LIKE TO CLARIFY THAT SUBSE QUENTLY IF THE ASSESSEE EXPLAINS THE REASONS FOR NON APPEARANCE AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED, THE MATTER MAY BE RECALLED FOR THE PUR POSE OF ADJUDICATION OF THE APPEAL. 5. IN THE RESULT, BOTH THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED IN LIMINE. 6. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 10-05-2016 . SD/- SD/- [J.S. REDDY] [H.S. SIDHU] ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER SRBHATNAGAR DATE: 10-05-2016 COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT - 2. RESPONDENT - 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT TRUE COPY BY ORDER, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, ITAT, DELHI BENCHES