, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH, CHENNAI . , . . , ! BEFORE SHRI A.MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI S.S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ I.T.A. NO.1806/MDS/2013 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009 -2010 ) SHRI. V.V. SRINIVASAN, 9A NEW COLONY MAIN RAOD, ALWATHIRUMAGAR, CHENNAI 600 087. [PAN: AAMPS 6935J ] ( '# /APPELLANT) VS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, BUSINESS WARD V (2), CHENNAI. ( $%'# /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : NONE / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI. A.V. SREEKANTH, IRS, JCIT. /DATE OF HEARING : 26.02.2015 ! /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 4.03.2015 & / O R D E R PER S.S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER THIS ASSESSEES APPEA L FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009- 2010; EMANATES FROM ORDER DATED 15.11.2012 PASSED B Y THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(A)-VIII, CHENNAI, IN IT A NO.147/11-12 (A)-VIII, IN PROCEEDINGS U/S. 143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 [IN SHORT THE ACT] I.T.A.NO.1806/MDS/2013. :- 2 -: 2. CASE CALLED TWICE. NONE HAS COME PRESENT AT THE ASSESSEES BEHEST. RPAD NOTICE ISSUED TO THE ASSESSEE HAS BEE N RECEIVED BACK UNSERVED. HENCE, IT IS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. 3. THEREFORE, HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT R ULES AND FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TR IBUNAL IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. (38 ITD 320) AND THE JUDGMEN T OF THE HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJ IRAO HOLKAR (223 ITR 480), THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED F OR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED . ORDER PRONOUNCED ON WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH OF MARCH, 20 15, AT CHENNAI. SD/- SD/- ( . ) (A.MOHAN ALANKAMONY) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( . . ) (S.S. GODARA) / JUDICIAL MEMBER '# /CHENNAI. $% /DATED:04.03.2015. KV %& '( )( /COPY TO: 1. * APPELLANT 2. / RESPONDENT 3. + ( )/CIT(A) 4. + /CIT 5. (,- . /DR 6. -/ 0 /GF. I.T.A.NO.1806/MDS/2013. :- 3 -: