Smt. Saroj Gupta, Delhi V. ITO, New Delhi

ITA 1807/DEL/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 126 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3569 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 9 month(s) 25 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 01-02-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC 1
• Next Hearing Date: 03-10-2016
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 06-04-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: KAUSHLENDRA TIWARI

Judgement Text

1 ITA.NO.1807/DEL./2016 SMT. SAROJ GUPTA, DELHI. IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES SMC : DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA.NO.1807/DEL./2016 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010 SMT. SAROJ GUPTA, W/O. LATE BIMAT KUMAR GUPTA, R/O.F-104-10, LAXMI NAGAR, DELHI. PANAAEPG1897M VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-45(1) {NOW 69(1)} NEW DELHI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) FOR ASSESSEE : -NONE- FOR REVENUE : SHRI KAUSHLENDRA TIWARI, SR. D.R. DATE OF HEARING : 23.01.2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 01.02.2018 ORDER THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE HAS BEEN DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-21, NEW DELHI, DATED 21 ST JANUARY, 2016, FOR THE A.Y. 2009-2010. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE DESPITE NOTIFYING THE DATE OF HEARING THROUGH REGISTERED PO ST. EVEN ON EARLIER OCCASION, APPEAL WAS ADJOURNED AT THE REQUE ST OF THE ASSESSEE. IT, THEREFORE, APPEARS THAT ASSESSEE IS N O MORE INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE AND HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES AND FOLLOWIN G VARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING THAT OF 2 ITA.NO.1807/DEL./2016 SMT. SAROJ GUPTA, DELHI. MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL.); HONBLE MA DHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF ESTATE O F LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP), AND ALSO THE DECISION OF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF CI T VS. B. BHATTACHARGEE & ANOTHER (118 ITR 461 AT PAGE 477-47 8) WHEREIN THEIR LORDSHIPS HELD THAT THE APPEAL DOES N OT MEAN, MERE FILING OF THE MEMO OF APPEAL BUT EFFECTIVELY P URSUING THE SAME, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS UN -ADMITTED. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMIS SED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT. SD/- (BHAVNESH SAINI) JUDICIAL MEMBER DELHI, DATED 01 ST FEBRUARY, 2018 VBP/- COPY TO 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) CONCERNED 4. CIT CONCERNED 5. D.R. ITAT SMC BENCH, DELHI 6. GUARD FILE. //BY ORDER// ASST. REGISTRAR : ITAT DELHI BENCHES : DELHI.