Shivam Water Treaters Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad V. The Dy. CIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad

ITA 1817/AHD/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 107 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4177 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 10 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 05-10-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 05-12-2019
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: S S SHUKLA
• Assessee Lawyers: CHHAJED
• Keywords: Condonation of delay; TDS; Set aside

Judgement Text

- , - IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD BENCH A BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE-PRESIDENT AND SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.1816 AND 1817/AHD/2019 / ASSTT.YEAR : 2013-14 AND 2014-15 SHIVAM WATER TREATERS P.LTD. SHIVAM HOUSE-3 KAHAN KRUPA DR.JIVRAJ MEHTA HOSPITAL ROAD VASANA AHMEDABAD 380 007. PAN : AAFCS 5613 R VS. DCIT, CIR.4(1)(1) AHMEDABAD. ( APPLICANT ) ( RESPONENT ) ASSESSEE BY : SHRI M.S. CHHAJED, AR REVENUE BY : SHRI S.S. SHUKLA, SR.DR / DATE OF HEARING : 29/09/2021 ! / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 5 /10/2021 / O R D E R PER RAJPAL YADAV, VICE-PRESIDENT PRESENT TWO APPEALS ARE DIRECTED AT THE INSTANCE OF THE ASSESSEE AGAINST SEPARATE ORDERS OF THE LD.CIT(A)-8 DATED 4. 10.2019 PASSED FOR THE ASSTT.YEARS 2013-14 AND 2014-15. 2. THESE APPEALS WERE LISTED BEFORE ON 29.9.2021. ON 29.9.2021 WE HAVE PASSED THE FOLLOWING ORDERS: INTERIM ORDER ITA NOS. 1816 & 1817/AHD/2019 THE PRESENT TWO APPEALS ARE DIRECTED AT THE INSTANC E OF THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE SEPARATE ORDERS OF LEARNED CIT(A) DATED 04.10.2 019 PASSED FOR ASSESSMENT ITA NO.1816 AND 1817/AHD/2019 2 YEARS 2013-14 AND 2014-15. IT EMERGES OUT FROM THE RECORD THAT THE LEARNED CIT(A) HAS DISMISSED BOTH THE APPEALS ON PRELIMINAR Y ISSUES VIZ. :- A. THAT THE ASSESSEE FAILED TO DEMONSTRATE THAT IT HAS PAID TAXES ON THE RETURNED INCOME. ACCORDING TO THE LEARNED CIT(A), AS PER SECTION 249(4), IF ASSESSEE FAILED TO PAY THE TAXES ON THE RETURNED INCOME, THEN ITS APPEAL CANNOT BE ENTERTAINED ON MERIT; B. THE APPEALS ARE TIME BARRED; C. FORM NO.35 HAS NOT BEEN DULY SIGNED AND VERIFIED. 2. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED T HAT THE TAXES HAVE BEEN PAID ALONG WITH RETURN IN FORM OF TDS DEDUCTED AT SOURCE OF ITS INCOME. AS FAR AS THE DELAY IS CONCERNED, IT IS TO BE TAKEN UP AFTER THE FIRST HURDLE IS REMOVED. 3. WE HAVE CONCLUDED THE HEARING WITH THE ASSISTANC E OF BOTH THE REPRESENTATIVES; BUT, IN ORDER TO SATISFY OURSELVES PRIMA FACIE AS TO WHETHER THE ASSESSEE HAS PAID THE TAXES OR NOT SO THAT WE CAN R EMIT THE ISSUE FOR VERIFICATION AND ADJUDICATION TO THE LEARNED FIRST APPELLATE AUT HORITY. HOWEVER, WE DEEM IT APPROPRIATE THAT THE AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY OF FORM N O.36 ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE SHOULD FILE AN AFFIDAVIT DEPOSING THEREIN THAT THE TAXES HAVE BEEN PAID AND THE MANNER IN WHICH THE TAXES HAVE BEEN PAID SO THAT TH IS FACT CAN BE VERIFIED BY THE LEARNED FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ENTERTAINING THE APPEALS. THEREFORE, WE FURTHER PROVIDE 10 DAYS TIME TO THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE TO FILE THE AFFIDAVIT IN BOTH THE ASSESSMENT YEARS. IN CASE T HE ASSESSEE FAILED TO SUBMIT SUCH AFFIDAVIT, THEN WE WILL DECIDE THE APPEALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. 4. WITH THE ABOVE OBSERVATIONS, THESE APPEALS ARE T REATED AS HEARD AND THE ORDERS RESERVED. COPY OF THIS ORDER-SHEET MAY BE S UPPLIED TO BOTH THE PARTIES. SD/- SD/- (PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA) (RAJPAL YADAV) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT 3. IN COMPLIANCE TO THE ABOVE ORDER, THE LD.COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FILED AN AFFIDAVIT OF SHRI GAURAV DAVE, WHICH READS AS UNDER: AFFIDAVIT I SHRI GAURAV DAVE, DIRECTOR OF SHIVAM WATER TREATE RS PRIVATE LIMITED (HEREIN AFTER REFERRED AS 'ASSESSEE COMPANY'), AGED ADULT, RESIDING AT A/G/1, PARSHWA PADMAVATI APARTMENT, OPP. MADHUVAN AVENUE, VASNA, AHMEDABAD-380007, GUJARAT, INDIA DO HEREBY SOLEMNLY AFFIRM AND STATE AS UNDER: :: ITA NO.1816 AND 1817/AHD/2019 3 A.Y. 2013-14 ASSESSEE COMPANY HAS FILED RETURN OF INCOME FOR AY 2013-14 SHOWING TOTAL INCOME OF RS.10,33,450/-. TAX PAYABLE ON TOTAL INCO ME WAS RS.3,10,035/-, EDUCATION CESS OF RS.6,201 AND SECONDARY AND HIGHER EDUCATION CESS OF RS.3,100/-TOTAL TAX LIABILITY WAS RS.3,19,336/-.ASS ESSEE COMPANY HAS DISCHARGED ITS TAX LIABILITY AS UNDER: PARTICULARS AMOUNT TDS 1,27,441 SELF ASSESSMENT TAX 2,16,920 TOTAL 3,44,361 AY 2014-15 ASSESSEE COMPANY HAS FILED RETURN OF INCOME FOR AY 2014-15 SHOWING TOTAL INCOME OF RS.10,75,170/-. TAX PAYABLE ON TOTAL INCO ME WAS RS.3,22,551/-, EDUCATION CESS OF RS.6,451 AND SECONDARY AND HIGHER EDUCATION CESS OF RS.3,226/-.TOTAL TAX LIABILITY WAS RS.3,32,2287-.AS SESSEE COMPANY HAS DISCHARGED ITS TAX LIABILITY AS UNDER: PARTICULARS AMOUNT TDS 2,01,664 SELF ASSESSMENT TAX 1,50,200 TOTAL 3,51,864 ASSESSEE COMPANY HAS PAID TAX AS PER RETURN OF INCO ME ALONG WITH RETURN OF INCOME, HENCE SECTION 249(4} OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 WOULD NOT APPLY. I SOLEMNLY VERIFY THAT FACTS STATED ABOVE ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF AND THAT NOTHING MATERIAL HAS BEEN CONCE ALED BY ME. DATE : 30.09.2021 PLACE : AHMEDABAD. SD/- ITA NO.1816 AND 1817/AHD/2019 4 4. WITHOUT GOING INTO FURTHER DETAILS, WE WOULD OBS ERVE THAT SUB- SECTION (4) OF SECTION 249 CONTEMPLATES AS UNDER: 249. (1) EVERY APPEAL UNDER THIS CHAPTER SHALL BE IN THE PRESCRIBED FORM49 AND SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE PRESCRIBED MANN ER AND SHALL, IN CASE OF AN APPEAL MADE TO THE COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) ON OR AFT ER THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 1998, IRRESPECTIVE OF THE DATE OF INITIATI ON OF THE ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS RELATING THERETO BE ACCOMPANIED BY A FE E OF, .......... ......... ........... (4) NO APPEAL UNDER THIS CHAPTER SHALL BE ADMITTED UNLESS AT THE TIME OF FILING OF THE APPEAL, (A) WHERE A RETURN HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE, THE ASSESSEE HAS PAID THE TAX DUE ON THE INCOME RETURNED BY HIM; OR (B) WHERE NO RETURN HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE , THE ASSESSEE HAS PAID AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE AMOUNT OF ADVANCE TAX WHICH WAS PAYABLE BY HIM: PROVIDED THAT, IN A CASE FALLING UNDER CLAUSE (B) A ND ON AN APPLICATION MADE BY THE APPELLANT IN THIS BEHALF, THE COMMISSIONER ( APPEALS) MAY, FOR ANY GOOD AND SUFFICIENT REASON TO BE RECORDED IN WRITING, EX EMPT HIM FROM THE OPERATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THAT CLAUSE. .......... ......... ........... 5. A PERUSAL OF OUR ABOVE INTERIM ORDER DATED 29.9. 2021 WOULD REVEAL THAT APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE HAVE BEEN DISMISSED BY THE LD.CIT(A) ON THE GROUND THAT CONDITIONS ENUMERATED IN SECTION 249(4) HAVE NOT BEEN FULFILLED. IN OTHER WORDS, THE ASSESSEE FAILED TO PAY TAXES ON THE RETURNED INCOME. HOWEVER, STAND OF THE ASSESSEE IS THAT IT HAS PAID TAXES, AND THEREFORE, WE HAVE DIRECTED THE ASSESSEE TO FILE AN AFFIDAVIT TO THAT EFFECT. THE DIRECTOR OF THE ASSESSEE-COMPANY HAS FILED THE AFFIDAVIT WHICH WE HAVE TAKEN COGNIZANCE. IN VIEW OF THE STAND OF THE ASSESSEE THAT IT HAS ALREADY PAID TAXES, AND THEREFORE, ITS APPEAL SHOUL D HAVE BEEN HEARD ON MERIT. WE DEEM IT APPROPRIATE TO SET ASIDE THE IM PUGNED ORDERS, AND RELEGATE THIS ISSUE TO THE FILE OF THE CIT(A). THE LD.CIT(A) WOULD VERIFY THE CLAIM MADE IN THE AFFIDAVIT AND IF SATISFIED TH AT CONDITIONS ITA NO.1816 AND 1817/AHD/2019 5 CONTEMPLATED IN SECTION 249(4) ARE FULFILLED, THEN THE ASSESSEE BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO REMOVE ALL OTHER IRREGULARITIES, IF ANY, I.E. SUBMISSION OF A SIGNED FORM NO.35, APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY ETC. BE PROVIDED. THE LD.CIT(A) AFTER SATISFYING HIMSELF A BOUT FULFILLMENT OF ALL REQUIREMENTS, DECIDE THE APPEAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. 6. WITH THE ABOVE OBSERVATION, BOTH APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE ALLOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSE. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 5 TH OCTOBER, 2021 AT AHMEDABAD. S D / - ( PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER S D / - (RAJPAL YADAV) VICE-PRESIDENT AHMEDABAD; DATED 5/10/2021