IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JAIPUR BENCH A JAIPUR (BEFORE SHRI R.K. GUPTA AND SHRI N.K. S AINI) ITA NO. 183 & 184/JP/2012 ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2007-08 & 2008-09 PAN: AAATK 8676 J KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI VS. THE ITO HINDAUN CITY WARD- 3, SAWAI MADHOPUR (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : MISS. ROSHANTA MEENA DATE OF HEARING: 28-08-2012 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 28- 08-2012 ORDER PER N.K. SAINI, AM:- THESE APPEALS HAVE BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAI NST TWO DIFFERENT ORDERS OF THE LD. CIT(A), KOTA DATED 25-01-2012 FOR THE ASSES SMENT YEARS 2007-08 AND 2008-09. 2. IN SPITE OF NOTING THE NEXT DATE OF HEARING OF T HE CASE FOR 28-08-2012 BY THE LD. AR OF THE ASSESSEE, THE CASE WAS NOT REPRESENTED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE WHEN IT WAS CALLED FOR HEARING. FROM THIS, IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PURSUE ITS CASE. SO IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, FOLLOWING THE DECISI ON OF DELHI BENCH OF ITAT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD., [1991] 38 ITD 320 AND ALSO ON THE JUDGEMENT OF THE HON'BLE M.P. HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF L ATE TUKHOJI RAO HOLKAR VS. CWT [1997] 223 ITR 480, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS N OT ADMITTED AND IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE AS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 28-08-2012. SD/- SD/- ( R.K. GUPTA) (N.K. SAINI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JAIPUR MISHRA COPY TO: 1.M/S. KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI, HINDAUN CITY 2. THE I.T.O. WARD- 3, SAWAI MADHOPUR 3.THE LD. CIT (A) BY ORDER 4.THE CIT 5.THE D/R 6.THE GUARD FILE (ITA NOS.183 & 184/JP/2012) AR: ITAT: JAIPUR