T HE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC - I BENCH, MUMBAI SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA ( A M) I.T.A. NO. 18 3 8 /MUM/ 201 9 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009 - 10 ) ITO - 27(1)(5) TOWER NO. 6, ROOM NO. 410, VASHI RAILWAY STATION COMPLEX, VASHI NAVI MUMBAI - 703. V S . M/S. GLUCK (INDIA ) MANUFACTURING COMPANY 113/114 SHIVSHAKTI INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, LBS MARG, GHATKOPAR WEST MUMBAI - 400 086. PAN : AAAFG0730H ( APPELLANT ) ( RESPONDENT ) ASSESSEE BY NONE DEPARTMENT BY SHRI KAILASH GAIKWAD DATE OF HEARING 1 3 . 10 . 20 20 DATE OF PRONO UNCEMENT 14. 10 . 20 20 O R D E R THIS IS AN APPEAL BY THE REVENUE WHEREIN THE REVENUE IS AG G RIEVED THAT LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) [IN SHORT LEARNED CIT(A)] HAS REDUCED THE ADDITION FOR BOGUS PURCHASE OF RS . 3,76,530/ - DONE @ 100% BY ASSESSING OFFICER BY SUSTAINING ONLY 12.5% . 2. THE ASSESSEE IN THIS CASE IS ENGAGED INTO BUSINESS OF MANUFACTURING OF PRESSURE GAUGES. THE ASSESSMENT WAS REOPENED UPON INFORMATION FROM SALES TAX DEPARTMENT THAT ASSESSEE HAS MADE RS. 3,76,530/ - PURCHASES FROM BOGUS DEALERS . T HE ASSESSING OFFICER MADE 100% ADDITION OF THE BOGUS PURCHASE . 3. UPON ASSESSEE'S APPEAL LEARNED CIT - A H AS NOTED THAT THE SALE HAS NOT BEEN DOUBTED. ACCORDINGLY PLACING RELIANCE UPON SEVERAL CASE LAWS AND UP ON THE FACTS OF THE CASE H E SUSTAINED 12.5 % DISALLOWANCE OUT OF THE BOGUS PURCHASES . 4. AGAINST ABOVE ORDER REVENUE IS IN APPEAL BEFORE THE ITAT. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE IN THE COURSE OF VIRTUAL HEARING. I FIND THAT IN THIS M/S. GLU CK (INDIA) MANUFACTURING COMPANY 2 CASE THE SALES HAVE NOT BEEN DOUBTED IT IS SETTLED LAW THAT WHEN SALES ARE NOT DOUBTED, HUNDRED PERCENT DISALLOWANCE FOR BOGUS PURCHASE CANNOT BE DONE. THE RATIONALE BEING NO SALES IS POSSIBLE WITHOUT ACTUAL PURCHASES. THIS PROPOSITION IS SUPPORTED FROM HONOURABLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT DECI SION IN THE CASE OF NIKUNJ E XIMP E NTERPRISES (IN WRIT PETITION NO 2860, ORDER DT . 18.6.2014). IN THIS CASE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT HAS UPHELD HUNDRED PERCENT ALLOWANCE FOR THE PURCHASES SAID TO BE BOGUS WHEN SALES ARE NOT DOUBTED. HOWEVER THE FACTS OF TH E PRESENT CASE INDICATE THAT ASSESSEE HAS MADE PURCHASE FROM THE GREY MARKET. MAKING PURCHASES THROUGH THE GREY MARKET GIVES THE ASSESSEE SAVINGS ON ACCOUNT OF NON - PAYMENT OF TAX AND OTHERS AT THE EXPENSE OF THE EXCHEQUER. IN SUCH SITUATION IN OUR CONSIDER ED OPINION ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE THE 12.5 % DISALLOWANCE OUT OF THE BOGUS PURCHASES DONE BY THE LEARNED CIT - A MEETS THE END OF JUSTICE. ACCORDINGLY I UPHOLD THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT - A. 5. THE DECISION OF N . K . P ROTEINS LTD. (250 ITR 22 ) RELIED BY THE REVENUE WAS A DISMISSAL OF SLP BY THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT AND HAS ALREADY BEEN EXPLAINED AND DISTINGUISHED BY HON'BLE BOMBAY HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF M. HAZI ADAM & CO. (ITA NO. 1004 OF 2006 DATED 11.2.2019). 6. IN THE RESULT THIS APPEA L FILED BY THE REVENUE STANDS DISMISSED . 7. BEFORE PARTING I MAY ADD THAT IF THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED A CROSS APPEAL OR CROSS OBJECTION AND THE SAME HAS REMAINED UNHEARD, EITHER PARTY MAY APPLY FOR RECALL OF THIS ORDER SO THAT THE APPEALS CAN BE HEARD TOGET HER . ORDER PRONOUNCED UNDER RULE 34(4) OF THE ITAT RULES ON 14.10.2020. SD/ - (SH A MIM YAHYA ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI ; DATED : 14 / 1 0 / 20 20 COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : M/S. GLU CK (INDIA) MANUFACTURING COMPANY 3 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER, //TRUE COPY// ( ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ) PS ITAT, MUMBAI