VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES (SMC), JAIPUR JH ,-MH- TSU U;KF;D LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI A.D. JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 184/JP/2016 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2007-08 KAUSHALYA DEVI KHANDELWAL, 1571, SINGH JI KI GALI, CHAURA RASTA, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. I.T.O., WARD 1(2), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ L A-@ PAN/GIR NO.: ADCPK 0666 R VIHYKFKHZ @ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ @ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY : NONE (DATE WAS NOTED) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SHRI R.A. VERMA (ADDL.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 08/09/2016 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 08/09/2016 VKNS'K @ ORDER PER: A.D. JAIN, J.M. THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-I, JAIPUR DATED 23/12/2015 FOR THE ASSESSME NT YEAR 2007-08. 2. IN SPITE OF NOTING THE DATE OF NEXT HEARING, NON E APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE WHEN IT WAS CALLED FOR HEARING. FROM THIS, IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PURSUE HIS CASE. SO IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF DELHI BENCH OF ITAT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. ITA NO. 184/JP/2016 KAUSHALYA DEVI KHANDELWAL VS. ITO 2 MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD., AND ALSO ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP), THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS NOT ADMI TTED AND IS DISMISSED AS LIMINE AS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 08/09/ 2016. SD/- , - MH TSU (A.D. JAIN) U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ @ JAIPUR FNUKAD @ DATED:- 08 TH SEPTEMBER, 2016 *RANJAN VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- KAUSHALYA DEVI KHANDELWAL, JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE ITO, WARD 1(2), JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 184/JP/2016) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR