Shitalkumar Shankarlal Prajapati, Ahmedabad V. Income Tax Officer,Ward-1(2)(4), Ahmedabad

ITA 1845/AHD/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 133 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9552 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 7 month(s) 23 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 12-02-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 01-02-2016
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 19-06-2015
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: P L KUREEL
• Keywords: Reasonable cause

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ ITA NO. 1845/AHD/2015 / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2010-11 SHITALKUMAR SHANKARLAL PRAJAPATI, PROP. OF M/S. NEW STAR FOUNDRY, A-804, VASANT VIHAR-1, NR. RAJENDRA LASKARI BUNGLOW, DAFNALA, SHAHIBAUG, AHMEDABAD 380 004 .. APPELLANT PAN : AFCPP 8417 A VS ITO, WARD -1(2)(4), AHMEDABAD .. RESPONDENT ASSESSEE(S) BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI P.L. KUREE L, SR. DR / DATE OF HEARING 01/02/2016 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 12/02/2016 / O R D E R THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-10 , AHMEDABAD DATED 13.03.2015 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010 -11. 2. HEARING OF THIS APPEAL WAS LAST FIXED ON 30.11.2 015 AND ON THAT DAY, IT WAS ADJOURNED TO 01.02.2016. WHEN THE CASE WAS CALLED FOR HEARING ON 01.02.2016, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AND NEITHER ANY ADJOURNMENT APPLICA TION WAS FILED. THIS SHOWS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERES TED IN PURSUING WITH HIS APPEAL. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF T HE DECISION OF HON'BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ES TATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480 (M .P.) AND (SMC) ITA NO. 1845/AHD/2015 SHITALKUMAR SHANKARLAL PRAJAPATI VS. ITO AY 2010-11 2 THE DECISION OF HON'BLE DELHI TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (PVT.) LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DELHI), I DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE . 2.1 THE ASSESSEE MAY, IF SO ADVISED, FILE AN APPLIC ATION BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL FOR RESTORATION OF HIS APPEAL AND HEA RING ON MERITS BY SHOWING REASONABLE CAUSE FOR NOT APPEARING BEFOR E THE TRIBUNAL ON THE DATE OF HEARING. THE BENCH, IF SO SATISFIED, MAY RECALL ITS ORDER AND RESTORE THE APPEAL TO ITS ORIG INAL NUMBER FOR HEARING ON MERITS. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED IN LIMINE . ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 12TH FEBRUARY, 201 6 AT AHMEDABAD. SD/- ( SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV ) JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 12/02/2016 BIJU T., PS / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. ! ' ' # / CONCERNED CIT 4. ' ' # ( ) / THE CIT(A) 5. &'( ! , ' ! , / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. (- . / GUARD FILE. / BY ORDER, TRUE COPY / ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) !', / ITAT, AHMEDABAD