Sh. Virender Kumar Pardesi, New Delhi V. ACIT, New Delhi

ITA 1862/DEL/2014

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 131 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6746 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 6 month(s) 30 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 27-10-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Next Hearing Date: 25-10-2016
• Assessment Year: 2004-2005
• Appeal Filed On: 28-03-2014
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: DR BALWAN CHAUHAN

Judgement Text

1 ITA NOS. 1862 & 18 63/DEL/2014 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: D NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R. S. SYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JU DICIAL MEMBER I.T.A .NO.-1862/DEL/20 14 (A. Y. 2004-05) I.T.A .NO.-1863/DEL/20 14 (A. Y. 2005-06) VIRENDER KUMAR PARDESI A-103, ASHOKA APPRT, SECTOR-9, ROHINI NEW DELHI AAHPP5601M (APPELLANT) VS ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE- 21, NEW DELHI (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY NONE RESPONDENT BY DR. BALWAN CHAUHAN, CIT DR ORDER PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM THIS APPEAL IS FILED AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 27/1/2 014 PASSED BY CIT(A) -XII, NEW DELHI. THIS MATTER WAS LISTED FOR HEARING ON VARIOUS DATES. ON 21/6/2016 THE MATTER WAS ADJOURN ED. TODAY, ONE MR. SHARAD AGARWAL, ADVOCATE APPEARED AND SOUGH T TIME. THE ASSESSEE WAS NOT PRESENT IN PERSON, ON LAST OCCASIO N AS WELL AS TODAY. SINCE, THE POWER OF ATTORNEY AND AUTHORITY TO APPEAR ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE IS NOT ON RECORD, WE CANNOT ENTERTAIN THE PLEA OF THE PERSON WHO HAS APPEARED SEEKING A SHORT ADJO URNMENT WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION BY THE ASSESSEE AS PER RULE 1 6 READ WITH RULE DATE OF HEARING 25.10.2016 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 27.10.2016 2 ITA NOS. 1862 & 18 63/DEL/2014 17 OF THE INCOME TAX (APPELLATE TRIBUNAL) RULES, 19 63. IT SEEMS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN THIS APPEAL. 2. HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF INCOME TAX APPELL ATE TRIBUNAL RULES AND FOLLOWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENC H OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING THAT OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. [38 ITD 320 (DELHI)] AND HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURTS DECISION IN CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT [223 ITR 48 0 (MP)], THIS APPEAL IS TREATED AS UN-ADMITTED AND DISMISSED. 3. IN RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE STANDS DIS MISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION. THE ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 27 TH OF OCTOBER, 2016. SD/- SD/- (R.S. SYAL) (SUC HITRA KAMBLE) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 27/10/2016 R. NAHEED * COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT R EGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI 3 ITA NOS. 1862 & 18 63/DEL/2014 DATE 1. DRAFT DICTATED ON 25.10.2016 PS 2. DRAFT PLACED BEFORE AUTHOR 25.10.2016 PS 3. DRAFT PROPOSED & PLACED BEFORE THE SECOND MEMBER .2016 JM/AM 4. DRAFT DISCUSSED/APPROVED BY SECOND MEMBER. JM/AM 5. APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR.PS/PS 2 7 .10.2016 PS/PS 6. KEPT FOR PRONOUNCEMENT ON PS 7. FILE SENT TO THE BENCH CLERK 2 7 .10.2016 PS 8. DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE AR 9. DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK. 10. DATE OF DISPATCH OF ORDER.