, , , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH : KOLKATA [ () )) ) , , . .. . ! ! ! !. .. . , ,, , '# ] ]] ] [BEFORE HONBLE SRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM & HONBLE S RI C. D. RAO, AM] % / I.T.A NO. 1868/KOL/2010 &' ()/ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2007-08 M/S.BEHERA BROTHERS -VS.- A .C.I.T., CIRCLE-28, KOLKATA [PAN : AACFB 7769 B] KOLKATA [ +, /APPELLANT ] [ -.+,/ RESPONDENT ] +, / FOR THE APPELLANT : NONE -.+, / FOR THE RESPONDENT : SHRI K.R.MONDAL '/ /ORDER . .. . ! ! ! !. .. . , ,, , '# PER C. D. RAO, A. M. THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THIS APPEAL FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08 AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A)-XIV, KOLKATA DATED 27.07.2010. 2. THIS APPEAL CAME FOR HEARING ON 29.11.2010 FOR T HE FIRST TIME AND SUBSEQUENTLY ON 23.02.2011, 24.05.2011, 29.08.2011 AND FINALLY ON 0 1.09.2011. NO ONE WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. NO ADJOURNMENT PETITION WAS MOVED. IT MEANS THAT ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PROSECUTE THE APPEAL. 3. CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN MIND THE DE CISION IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL AS ASSESSEE NOT INTERESTED. 2 4. HOWEVER, THE ASSESSEE SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO APP ROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR RECALLING THIS ORDER, IF PREVENTED BY SUFFICIENT CAUSE FOR NON-APP EARANCE ON THE DATE OF HEARING. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION. '/ #0' 1 0& 2 3 !# ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 01.09. 2011. SD/- SD/- [ , ] [ . .. . ! ! ! !. .. . , ,, , '# ] [ MAHAVIR SINGH ] [ C. D. RAO ] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (!#) DATED : 01.09. 2011. [RG &45 6 /.PS] '/ 7 -8 9'8(/ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. +, /APPELLANT : M/S.BEHERA BROTHERS, 7/3, MUNSHIGANJ ROAD, KIDDERPORE, KOLKATA-700023. 2 -.+, / A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-28, KOLKATA 3. /&/ THE CIT, 4. /& ()/ THE CIT(A)-XIV, KOLKATA. 5. ?2 -&/ DR, KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA [.8 -/ TRUE COPY ] '/&0/ BY ORDER , 5 /ASSTT REGISTRAR