IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH C, NEW DELHI BEFORE : SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 1880 & 1881/DEL./2015 ASSESSMENT YEARS: 2007-08 AND 2010-11 GLOBUS INFOCOM LTD., C - 1/2, SAFDARJUNG DEVELOPMENT AREA, DELHI (PAN AABCG 3985 C). (APPELLANT) VS. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 1, MUZAFFARNAGAR. (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY NONE RESPONDENT BY SH. ARUN KUMAR YADAV, SR. DR ORDER PER L.P. SAHU, A.M.: THESE TWO APPEALS AT THE INSTANCE OF ASSESSEE ARIS E OUT OF THE ORDERS DATED 06.02.2015 AND 21.01.2015 OF LD. CIT(A) FOR T HE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2007- 08 AND 2010-11 RESPECTIVELY. NONE IS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE DESPITE T HE NOTICE SENT TO THE ASSESSEE AT THE GIVEN ADDRESS. THE NOTICE SO ISSUED IS DEEMED TO BE SERVED UPON THE ASSESSEE. HOWEVER, THERE IS NO REPRESENTAT ION ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR IS THERE ANY WRITTEN REQUEST FOR ADJOU RNMENT ON RECORD. IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROS ECUTING THE APPEALS. DATE OF HEARING 08.11.2017 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 08.11.2017 1880 & 1881/DEL./2015 2 THEREFORE, THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE DESERVE TO B E DISMISSED IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION IN VIEW OF THE ORDERS OF TRIBUN AL IN CIT VS. MULTI PLAN INDIA (P) LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL.) AND OF M.P. HIGH COURT IN ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP). 3. IN THE RESULT, BOTH THE APPEALS ARE DISMISSED, A S INDICATED ABOVE. ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 08.11.2017 . SD/- SD/- (H.S. SIDHU) (L.P. SAHU) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 08.11.2017 *AKS* COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: (1) THE APPELLANT (2) THE RESPONDENT (3) COMMISSIONER (4) CIT(A) (5) DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE (6) GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES, NEW DELHI