Raj Television Network Limited, CHENNAI V. DIT, CHENNAI

ITA 1884/CHNY/2010

• Counselvise Citation: [2011] 135 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1258 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 month(s) 1 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 11-01-2011
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 09-11-2010
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOMETAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL: A- BENCH:CHENN AI (BEFORE SHRI U.B.S. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ABRAHAM P.GEORGE. ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.1884/ MDS/10 ASST. YEAR 2009-10 M/S RAJ TELEVISION NETWORK LTD, NO.32 POES RD, 2 ND ST., TEYNAMPET, CHENNAI 600018 TAN CHER02242C VS THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME- TAX,(CIB), CHENNAI (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY: RESPONDENT BY: NONE SRI SHAJI P.JACOB ORDER PER ABRAHAM P.GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER W HEN THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE WAS CALLED FOR HEARI NG NO BODY ENTERED APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. WE FIND THAT THE NOTICE FOR HEARING WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE BY REGISTERED POST AND ACKNOWL EDGEMENT FOR HAVING RECEIVED THE NOTICE ON 13-11-2010 IS ON RECORD. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, WE ARE OF THE CONSIDERED OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE SEEMS TO BE NO T INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE CASE. HENCE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BE NCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN INDIA P. LTD., REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320 WE DISMISS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR NON-PROSECUTION . ITA NO 1884/MDS/10 2 APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS THEREFORE DISMISSED. ORDER WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 11-01- 2011. SD/- SD/- ( U.B.S.BEDI) (ABRAHAM P. GEORGE) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER CHENNAI: 12 TH JANUARY, 2011. NBR CC: ASSESSEE/ ASSESSING OFFICER/ CIT(A)/ CIT/ D .R/ GUARD FILE.