Shri Kamlesh J. Laskari, Gandhinagar V. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Mehsana

ITA 189/AHD/2014

• Counselvise Citation: [2017] 130 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9422 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 11 month(s) 26 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 16-01-2017
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 16-01-2017
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 20-01-2014
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: P S CHAUDHARY
• Keywords: Reasonable cause

Judgement Text

, B IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI S.S.GODARA, JM & SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM ./ ITA NO.189/AHD/2014 / ASSTT. YEAR: 2009-10 SHRI KAMLESH J LASKARI, C/O KAMRON LAB LTD.,, 737, RAKANPUR, SOLA SANTEJ ROAD, TAL KALOL, DIST. GHANDHINGAR PAN :AAHPL3241D VS INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, MEHSANA ! / (APPELLANT) '# ! / (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI P.S. CHAUDHARY, SR.DR / DATE OF HEARING : 16 /01/2017 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 16 /01/2017 $%/ O R D E R PER MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THIS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST ORDER OF THE CIT(A), GANDHINAGAR, AHMEDABAD DATED 01/11/2013 FOR ASSTT.YEAR 2009-10. 2. ON THE LAST DATE OF HEARING 16.11.2016 THE CASE WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 16.01.2017. WHEN THE CASE WAS CALLED FOR HEARING NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AND NEITHER ANY ADJOURNMENT PETITION WAS FILED. THIS SHOWS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT SERIOUS IN PURSUING WITH THIS APPEAL, AND THEREFORE, BY FOLLOW ING THE DECISION OF ITAT, DELHI BENCH, IN CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DELHI), WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE . 3. THE ASSESSEE MAY, IF SO ADVISED, FILE AN APPLICA TION BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL FOR RESTORATION OF ITS APPEAL AND HEARING ON MERITS BY SHOWING ITA NO.189/AHD/2014 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2009-10 2 REASONABLE CAUSE FOR NOT APPEARING BEFORE THE TRIBU NAL ON THE DATE OF HEARING, WITHIN LIMITATION PROVIDED IN THE INCOME-TAX ACT. THE BENCH, IF SO SATISFIED, MAY RECALL ITS ORDER AND RESTORE THE APP EAL TO ITS ORIGINAL NUMBER FOR HEARING ON MERITS. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED IN LIMINE . ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 16/01/2017 AT A HMEDABAD. SD/- (S.S.GODARA) TRUE COPY JUDICIAL MEMBER SD (MANISH BOARD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 16/01/2017 $% & ''() *$)' / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. ! / CONCERNED CIT 4. ! ( ) / THE CIT(A), AHMEDABAD 5. $%& '' , , )*++ / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. &,- . / GUARD FILE. $% + / BY ORDER, ,/ - ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, AHMEDABAD