Smt. Ritu Jain, New Delhi V. CIT-X, New Delhi

ITA 1896/DEL/2014

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 87002 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 11 month(s) 9 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 10-03-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Next Hearing Date: 10-03-2015
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 01-04-2014
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: VIKRAM SAHAY
• Section: 143(3); 263

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH F NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.S.SYAL , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI A.T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 1896 /DEL/ 2014 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2009 - 10 ) RITU JAIN, 4755, LAXMI BAZAR, CLOTH MARKET, NEW DELHI PAN:AAEPJ1792N VS. CIT - X , NEW DELHI (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) DEPARTMENT BY : VED JAIN & ASSOCIATES ASSESSEE BY : SH. VIKRAM SAHAY, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING 10.03.2015 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 10 . 03 .2015 O R D E R PER A. T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT - X , DELHI DATED 04.02.2014 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 200 9 - 10 ASSESSMENT YEAR . 2. AT THE OUTSET THE LD. AR BROUGHT TO OUR NOTICE THE ASSESSEE S LETTER DATED 10.03.2015 SEEKING PERMISSION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE INSTANT APPEAL. ACCORDING TO THE LD AR THE ASSESSEE HAD PREFERRED THE APPEAL AGAINST THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE CIT U/S 263 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (HEREIN AFTER THE ACT) FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009 - 10. SINCE THE CONSEQUENTIAL ORDER U/S 143(3) READ WITH SECTION 263 HAS BEEN PASSED BY THE AO , THE ASSESSEE SEEKS TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL PREFERRED BEFORE US. 3. THE LD. DR DOES NOT HAVE ANY OBJECTION FOR THE ASSESSEE WITHDRAWING THE INSTANT APPEAL. 4. WE HAVE HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES AND HAVE GONE THROUGH THE LETTER DATED 10 TH MARCH 2015 , WHEREIN THE ASSESSEE HAS SOUGHT WITHDRAWAL OF THE INSTANT APPEAL SINCE THE CONSEQUENTIAL ORDER PASSED BY THE AO PURSUANT TO THE REVISIONAL ORDER OF LD CIT U/S 263. SINCE THE ASSESSEE WANT TO WITHDRAW THE INSTANT APPEAL AND THE REVENUE DOES NOT HAVE A NY OBJECTION FOR THE SAME , WE DEEM IT FIT TO ALLOW THE ASSESSEE S PRAYER; AND THEREFORE THE APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 5. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED . ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 10 .03.2015 . - SD/ - - SD/ - ( R.S.SYAL ) (A. T. VARKEY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED : 10 .03.2015 A K KEOT COPY FORWARDED TO 1. APPLICANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR:ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI