VINEET KRISHNAKUMAR GOYAL, PUNE V. Dy CIT Central Circle 2(1), PUNE

ITA 1899/PUN/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 106 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4981 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 7 month(s) 18 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 20-07-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2015-2016
• Appeal Filed On: 02-12-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “बी” Ɋायपीठ पुणेमŐ। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI S.S.GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं. / ITA No.1899/PUN/2019 िनधाᭅरणवषᭅ / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Vineet Krishnakumar Goyal, A-102, ICC Trade Tower, Senapati Bapat Road, Pune – 411016. PAN: AEMPG 4196 B Vs The Dy.CIT, Central Circle-2(1), Pune. Appellant/ Revenue Respondent /Assessee Assessee by None. Revenue by Shri N.G.Jasnani – DR Date of hearing 19/07/2022 Date of pronouncement 21/07/2022 आदेश/ ORDER PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM: This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the order of ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-12, Pune for the A.Y. 2015-16 dated 24.09.2019, emanating out of order under section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The appeal came up hearing on 19 th July, 2022. At the time of hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, perusal of the record shows that the vide application dated 05.03.2021 the appellant assessee has submitted that the assessee has already been issued FORM-5 and settled dispute with Income Tax Department by availing the benefits of Vivad se Visvas Scheme -2020 (VSV-20) ITA No.1899/PUN/2019 for A.Y. 2015-16 Vineet Krishnakumar Goyal Vs. DCIT, Cen. Cir-2(1), Pune [A] 2 from designated authority vide Acknowledgment No.346113670290421 dated 29.04.2021. The assessee requested to withdraw this appeal. 3. On the other hand the learned Departmental Representative (DR) submits that he has no objection, if the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. We have considered the contents of the withdrawal application filed by the assessee and the submissions of the Ld.DR for the Revenue. Considering the facts that the assessee has already filed application before the prescribed authority and settled the tax liability with the income–tax department under VSV-20 and have received FORM-5 vide Acknowledgement No.346113670290421 dated 29.04.2021 from designated authority. Hence, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn 5. In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee stands dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. Order pronounced in the open Court on 21 st July, 2022. Sd/- Sd/- (S.S.GODARA) (DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; ᳰदनांक / Dated : 21 st July, 2022/ SGR* ITA No.1899/PUN/2019 for A.Y. 2015-16 Vineet Krishnakumar Goyal Vs. DCIT, Cen. Cir-2(1), Pune [A] 3 आदेशकᳱᮧितिलिपअᮕेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथᱮ / The Appellant. 2. ᮧ᭜यथᱮ / The Respondent. 3. The CIT(A), concerned. 4. The Pr. CIT, concerned. 5. िवभागीयᮧितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “बी” बᱶच, पुणे / DR, ITAT, “B” Bench, Pune. 6. गाडᭅफ़ाइल / Guard File. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, // TRUE COPY // Senior Private Secretary आयकरअपीलीयअिधकरण, पुणे/ITAT, Pune.