Shri Manish Videh, Ahmedabad V. The Income tax Officer,Ward-8(4), Ahmedabad

ITA 1907/AHD/2010

• Counselvise Citation: [2014] 120 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6973 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 year(s) 6 month(s) 8 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 12-12-2014
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Next Hearing Date: 10-11-2014
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 03-06-2010
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ROOP CHAND SR DR

Judgement Text

, , , , D, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT AHMEDABAD, D BENCH . .. . . .. . , !' !' !' !', , , , #$ %&'( #$ %&'( #$ %&'( #$ %&'(, , , , )* + ) ' )* + ) ' )* + ) ' )* + ) ' BEFORE S/SHRI G.C. GUPTA, VICE-PRESIDENT AND ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) ITA NO.1907/AHD/2010 [ASSTT.YEAR : 2006-2007] SHRI MANISH VIDEH B/21, GOYAL TERRACE JUDGES BUNGALOW ROAD, BODAKDEV AHMEDABAD. PAN : ABUPV 5455 D /VS. ITO, WARD-8(4) AHMEDABAD. ( (( ( -. -. -. -. / APPELLANT) ( (( ( /0-. /0-. /0-. /0-. / RESPONDENT) 1& 2 3 ) / ASSESSEE BY : NONE + 2 3 ) / REVENUE BY : SHRI ROOPCHAND, SR.DR 5 2 &(* / DATE OF HEARING : 10 TH NOVEMBER, 2014 678 2 &(* / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 12/12/2014 )9 / O R D E R PER G.C. GUPTA, VICE-PRESIDENT: THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSTT.YEAR : 2006-2007 IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A). 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF O F THE ASSESSEE- APPELLANT. THE ASSESSEE HAS SOUGHT ADJOURNMENT ON MANY OCCASIONS AND THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED SEVERAL TIMES AT THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE. ON 12.11.2012 THE CASE WAS ADJOURNMENT AT THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE TO ITA NO.1907/AHD/2010 -2- 28.1.2013. ON THIS DATE ALSO, THE ASSESSEE HAS APPL IED FOR ADJOURNMENT AND THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED TO 28.3.2013 AS LAST CHANCE TO THE ASSESSEE. THEREAFTER ALSO THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS ADJOU RNMENT ON MANY OCCASIONS. IN THESE FACTS, THE BENCH REJECTED THE APPLICATION OF THE ASSESSEE FOR ADJOURNMENT OF THE CASE, AS NO VALID R EASONS FOR SEEKING ADJOURNMENT HAS BEEN GIVEN BY THE ASSESSEE. IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, IT IS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PUR SING ITS APPEAL. THEREFORE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUN AL IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. 38 ITD 320, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF T HE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON THE DATE MENTIONE D HEREINABOVE. SD/- SD/- ( %&'( %&'( %&'( %&'( / ANIL CHATURVEDI) )* + )* + )* + )* + /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( . .. . . .. . /G.C. GUPTA) !' !' !' !' /VICE-PRESIDENT C OPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1) : APPELLANT 2) : RESPONDENT 3) : CIT(A) 4) : CIT CONCERNED 5) : DR, ITAT. BY ORDER DR/AR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD