IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘SMC’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.1928/Del/2018 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Sh. Rohit Kumar Gupta, Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate, Chamber No. 206-207, Ansal “Satyam” RDC Raj Nagar, Ghaziabad Vs. ITO, Ward-2(2), Ghaziabad PAN :ABKPG6371K (Appellant) (Respondent) ORDER This is an appeal by the assessee against order dated 16.10.2017 of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Ghaziabad, pertaining to assessment year 2014-15. 2. I have heard Sh. Akhilesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the assessee and Sh. Om Prakash, learned Departmental Representative. 3. Learned counsel for the assessee, on instructions, sought withdrawal of the appeal as the assessee has opted for settling the Appellant by Sh. Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate Sh. Vipin Garg, Advocate Respondent by Sh. Om Prakash, Sr. DR Date of hearing 20.07.2022 Date of pronouncement 20.07.2022 2 ITA No.1928/Del/2018 AY: 2014-15 dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Copies of Forms 1, 2, and 3 have been placed on record. 4. Learned Departmental Representative did not object to the assessee’s request for withdrawal of the appeal. 5. Having considered rival submissions, I permit the assessee to withdraw the present appeal. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event of non-acceptance of assessee’s declaration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, liberty is granted to the assessee to seek recall of this order and revival of the appeal. 6. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 20 th July, 2022 Sd/- (SAKTIJIT DEY) JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 20 th July, 2022. RK/- Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi