IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S, JAIPUR JH HKKXPUN] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI BHAGCHAND, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA NO. 193/JP/2017 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2010-11. SHIV SINGH MEENA C/O SH. JAGDISH KCHAND GUPTA NAHAR ROAD, GANGAPUR CITY. CUKE VS. ITO WARD-2, SAWAI MADHOPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN NO. ACOPM 6709 Q VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS@ ASSESSEE BY : NONE JKTLO DH VKSJ LS@ REVENUE BY : SMT. POONAM RAI (DCIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 06.12.2017. ?KKS'K .KK DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 06/12/2017. VKNS'K@ ORDER PER SHRI BHAGCHAND ,AM. THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAIN ST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT (A), RAWATBHATA ROAD, KOTA DATED 07.12.2016 PERTAINING T O ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, NO ONE APPEARED ON BEHAL F OF THE ASSESSEE. THERE IS ALSO NO APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT. THEREFORE, TH IS CONDUCT OF ASSESSEE SHOWS THAT HE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING HIS APPEAL. IN THE SE CIRCUMSTANCES, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF DELHI BENCH OF ITAT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD., (1991) 38 ITD 320 AND ALSO ON THE JUDGMENT OF THE H ONBLE M.P. HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKHOJI RAO HOLKAR VS. CWT ( 1997) 223 ITR 480 (MP), THEREFORE, THE BENCH DISMISSES THE APPEAL OF THE AS SESSEE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED. 2 ITA NO. 193/JP/2017. SH. SHIV SINGH MEENA. ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 06.12.20 17. SD/- ( HKKXPUN ( BHAGCHAND) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JAIPUR DATED:- 06/12/2017. POOJA/ VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSF'KR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. THE APPELLANT- SH. SHIV SINGH MEENA, SAWAI MADH OPUR. 2. THE RESPONDENT THE ITO, WARD-2, SAWAI MADHOPUR . 3. THE CIT(A). 4. THE CIT, 5. THE DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 193/JP/2017) VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASSISTANT. REGISTRAR