M.Muthukumar, CHENNAI V. ITO, CHENNAI

ITA 197/CHNY/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2017] 130 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8150 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 11 month(s) 7 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 11-01-2017
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 09-01-2017
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 03-02-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SUPRIYA PAL IRS

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B (SMC) BENCH : CHENNAI . , BEFORE SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./I.T.A. NO. 197/MDS/2016. / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2010-2011 SHRI. M. MUTHUKUMAR, NO.20/28, PERIYAR SALAI, TEYNAMPET, CHENNAI 600 018. VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NON CORPORATE WARD 3(4) CHENNAI 600 034. [PAN AOXPM 3160Q] ( / APPELLANT) ( /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : NONE /RESPONDENT BY : SHRI. SUPRIYA PAL, IRS, JCIT. ! /DATE OF HEARING : 09-01-2017 '# ! /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 09-01-2017 / O R D E R I FOUND THAT THE APPEAL WAS EARLIER POSTED FOR HEA RING ON 13.10.2016 AND AT THE REQUEST OF THE LD. AUTHORISE D REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ASSESSEE, THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED TO 09.01.2 017 I.E. TO-DAY. WHEN THIS APPEAL WAS CALLED UP FOR HEARING, NONE AP PEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY ADJOURNMENT REQUEST WAS REC EIVED. IN THE ITA NO. 197/MDS/2016. :- 2 -: CIRCUMSTANCES, I AM OF THE OPINION THAT THE ASSESS EE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE CASE. FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF CIT V. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. (38 ITD 320) (DEL), I DISMISS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE, FOR NO N-PROSECUTION. 2. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE STANDS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON MONDAY, THE 9 TH JANUARY, 2017, AT CHENNAI. SD/- ( . ) (ABRAHAM P. GEORGE) $ %& / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER $% / CHENNAI & / DATED:9TH JANUARY, 2017. KV ' )* +* / COPY TO: 1 . / APPELLANT 3. , () / CIT(A) 5. */0 1 / DR 2. / RESPONDENT 4. , / CIT 6. 02 3 / GF