M/s. Rasikbhai Raghavbhai Medpara, Ahmedabad V. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 9(1), Ahmedabad

ITA 1975/AHD/2013

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 132 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0749 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 1 month(s) 7 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 26-08-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 22-08-2016
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 19-07-2013
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: RAJESH MEENA
• Keywords: Reasonable cause

Judgement Text

, SMC IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI PROMOD KUMAR, AM & SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JM ./ ITA NO.1975/AHD/2013 / ASSTT. YEAR: 2008-09 M/S RASIKBHAI MEDPARIA, N/9 PAYAL FLATS, JUDGES BUNGLOWS ROAD, SATELLITE,AHMEDABAD. PAN :AGXPM 9094R VS ITO, WARD 9(1), AHMEDABAD. ! / (APPELLANT) '# ! / (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI RAJESH MEENA, SR.DR / DATE OF HEARING : 22/8/2016 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 26/08/2016 $%/ O R D E R PER MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER: THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST ORD ER OF THE CIT(A)-XV, AHMEDABAD, DATED 12/3/2013 FOR ASSTT.YEA R 2008-09. 2. ON THE LAST DATE OF HEARING 22.6.2016 THE CASE W AS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 22.8.2016. WHEN THE CASE WAS CALLED FOR HEARING NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AND NEITHER ANY ADJOURNMENT PETITION WAS FILED. THIS SHOWS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT SERIOUS IN PURSUING WITH THIS APPEAL, AND THEREFORE, BY FOLLOW ING THE DECISION OF ITAT, DELHI BENCH, IN CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DELHI), WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE . ITA NO1975/AHD/2013 2 3. THE ASSESSEE MAY, IF SO ADVISED, FILE AN APPLICA TION BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL FOR RESTORATION OF ITS APPEAL AND HEARING ON MERITS BY SHOWING REASONABLE CAUSE FOR NOT APPEARING BEFORE THE TRIBU NAL ON THE DATE OF HEARING, WITHIN LIMITATION PROVIDED IN THE INCOME-TAX ACT. THE BENCH, IF SO SATISFIED, MAY RECALL ITS ORDER AND RESTORE THE APP EAL TO ITS ORIGINAL NUMBER FOR HEARING ON MERITS. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED IN LIMINE . ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 26/8/2016 AT AH MEDABAD. SD/- (PRAMOD KUMAR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SD/- (MAHAVIR PRASAD) JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 26/08/2016 $% & ''() *$)' / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. ! / CONCERNED CIT 4. ! ( ) / THE CIT(A), AHMEDABAD 5. $%& '' , , )*++ / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. &,- . / GUARD FILE. $% + / BY ORDER, ,/ - ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, AHMEDABAD 1. DATE OF DICTATION- 22/8/2016 2. DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER 23/8/2016: 3. DATE ON WHICH THE APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR.P. S./P.S. - 4. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER IS PLACED BEFORE THE D ICTATING MEMBER FOR PRONOUNCEMENT : 5. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE BENCH CLERK. 26/ 8/16 6. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK . 7. THE DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE ASSISTANT RE GISTRAR FOR SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER.. 8. DATE OF DESPATCH OF THE ORDER