MANGATRAI JEWELS, HYDERABAD V. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax ,Circle-6(1), Hyderabad

ITA 20/Hyd/2022

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 105 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7386 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 month(s) 9 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 07-03-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB-A
• Assessment Year: 2019-2020
• Appeal Filed On: 26-01-2022
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: T. SUNIL GOUTAM
• Section: 43B; 143(1)

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad (Through Video Conferencing) Before Shri S.S. Godara, Judicial Member AND Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Accountant Member O R D E R Per S. S. Godara, J.M. This assessee’s appeal for A.Y 2019-20 arises from the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi’s order dated 26.11.2021 in case No.ITBA/ NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1037251020(1) involving proceedings under section 143(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, “the Act”). 2. Coming to the sole substantive issue of ESI/PF disallowance of Rs.4,12,506/- made in both the lower proceedings, the assessee’s and Revenue’s plea(s) before us are that the same had been paid before the due date of filing Sec.139(1) return and after the due date prescribed in the corresponding statutes; respectively. We notice in ITA No.20/Hyd/2022 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Mangatrai Jewels, Hyderabad. PAN : AAXFM2687A. Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 6(1), Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: None Revenue by : Shri T. Sunil Goutam Date of hearing: 08.03.2022 Date of pronouncement: 08.03.2022 ITA No.20/Hyd/2022 2 this factual backdrop that the legislature has not only incorporated necessary amendment in Sections 36(1)(va) as well as u/s. 43B vide Finance Act, 2021 to this effect but also the CBDT has issued Memorandum of Explanation that the same applies w.e.f. 01-04-2021. It is further not an issue that the foregoing legislative amendments have proposed employers’ contribution / disallowance u/s.43B as against employee’s contribution u/s.36(va) of the Act; respectively. However, keeping in mind the fact that the same has been clarified to be applicable with prospective effect from 01-04-2021, we hold that the impugned disallowance is not sustainable in view of all these latest developments. The impugned ESI/PF disallowance is deleted therefore. 3. This assessee’s appeal is allowed in above terms. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 08 th March, 2022. Sd/- Sd/- (LAXMI PRASAD SAHU) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (S.S. GODARA) JUDICIAL MEMBER Hyderabad, dated 08 th March, 2022. TYNM/sps ITA No.20/Hyd/2022 3 Copy to: S.No Addresses 1 Mangatrai Jewels, 8-2-293/82/499/1/GF-1 KRISH-E 36, Road No.36, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 6(1), Hyderabad. 3 Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi 4 DR, ITAT Hyderabad Benches 5 Guard File By Order