IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH `F : NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI U.B.S. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI T.S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.2003/DEL./2010 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2005-06) RAMAN VEER SINGH, VS. ITO, WARD 2(2), A-28, LOHIA NAGAR, GHAZIABAD. GHAZIABAD. (PAN/GIR NO.AIDPS6194G) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : MS. PRISILLA SINGCIT, SR.DR ORDER PER U.B.S. BEDI, J.M. THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE EMANATES FROM THE ORDER OF THE CIT (A), GHAZIABAD, DATED 22.12.2009, RELEVANT TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005- 06. 2. NONE ATTENDED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT WAS RECEIVED AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF THE APPEAL ON 7. 11.2012, DESPITE THE FACT THAT ON EARLIER SEVERAL OCCASIONS ALSO, THE HEARINGS WERE ADJOURNED FOR ONE REASON OR THE OTHER. THUS, IT IS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTION OF THE PRESENT APPEAL. 3. HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES, 1963 AND FOLLOWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. M ULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD., REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320 (DEL.) AND THE JUDGMENT OF HONBLE MADHYA P RADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, 223 I.T.R. 480 (MP), WE TREAT THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE AS UNADMITTED AND DISMISS THE SAME. I.T.A. NO.2003/DEL./2010 (A.Y. : 2005-06) 2 4. AS A RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE I S DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT SOON AFTER THE CONC LUSION OF THE HEARING ON 07.11.2012. SD/- SD/- (T.S. KAPOOR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (U.B.S. BEDI ) JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED : NOV. 07, 2012 SKB COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO:- 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A), GHAZIABAD. 5. CIT(ITAT) DEPUTY REGISTRAR, ITAT