Winjit Technologies P Ltd, Nashik V. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle-1, Nashik

ITA 204/PUN/2021

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 106 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3838 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 23-06-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2018-2019
• Appeal Filed On: 26-05-2021
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Section: 2; 43B; 139; 139(1)

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH, ‘B’ PUNE BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.204/PUN/2021 नधा रण वष / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Winjit Technologies Pvt. Ltd., C1/1, A Road Nice, MIDC, Satpur, Nashik – 422 007 Maharashtra PAN : AAACW5333M Vs. ACIT, Circle-1, Nashik Appellant Respondent आदेश / ORDER PER R.S. SYAL, VP : This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 24-03-2021 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi u/s.250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’) in relation to the assessment year 2018-19. 2. The only issue raised in this appeal is against the confirmation of disallowance of Rs.28,21,112/- made by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s.36(1)(va) of the Act on account of late deposit of the Employees’ share of EPF and ESI etc. Assessee by Shri Pramod Shingte Revenue by Shri M.G. Jasnani Date of hearing 24-06-2022 Date of pronouncement 24-06-2022 ITA No.204/PUN/2021 Winjit Technologies Private Limited 2 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the AO made disallowance of Rs.28,21,112/- in the intimation u/s.143(1) of the Act on the ground that the assessee late deposited the employees’ share of EPF and ESI etc. The ld. CIT(A) affirmed the disallowance. 4. We have heard both the sides and gone through the relevant material on record. It is seen as an admitted position that the assessee did deduct employees’ share of EPF and ESI and paid the same after the due date under the respective legislations but before the time stipulated for filing return u/s 139(1) of the Act. In our opinion, this issue is no more res integra in view of several judgments allowing deduction u/s 36(1)(va) of employees’ share of contribution deposited after due date under the respective Acts but before the date prescribed u/s 139 of the Act. The Hon’ble Himachal Pradesh High Court in CIT vs. Nipso Polyfabriks Ltd. (2013) 350 ITR 327 (HP) has held that there exists no difference between employees or employer’s contribution and both are to be allowed as deduction if deposited before the due date. 5. At this juncture, it is relevant to mention that the Finance Act, 2021 has inserted Explanation 2 below section 36(1)(va) ITA No.204/PUN/2021 Winjit Technologies Private Limited 3 providing that the provisions of section 43B shall not apply for the purpose of determining the due date under this clause w.e.f. 01.04.2021. The effect of this amendment is that if the amount of employees’ contribution towards EPF, ESI, etc is delayed by an employer beyond the due date under the respective Acts, the disallowance will be called for notwithstanding the fact that it was deposited before the due date u/s 139 of the Act. The Memorandum explaining the provisions of the Finance Bill, 2021, provides that this amendment will take effect from 1 st April, 2021 and will, accordingly apply in relation to assessment year 2021- 2022 and subsequent assessment years. Since the assessment year under consideration is 2018-19, which is anterior to the amendment carried out with effect from A.Y. 2021-22, we hold that the position of law as set out by various Hon’ble High Courts including the one in CIT vs. Nipso Polyfabriks Ltd. (supra) squarely applies to the facts and circumstances of the instant case, thereby not warranting any disallowance since the amount in question was admittedly deposited before due date u/s 139(1) of the Act. The addition is therefore, directed to be deleted. ITA No.204/PUN/2021 Winjit Technologies Private Limited 4 6. In the result, the appeal is allowed. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 24 th June, 2022. Sd/- Sd/- ( S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI) (R.S.SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे Pune; िदनांक Dated : 24 th June, 2022 सतीश आदेश की ितिलिप अ ेिषत/Copy of the Order is forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ / The Appellant; 2. 3. थ / The Respondent NFAC, Delhi 4. 5. The CIT concerned DR, ITAT, ‘B’ Bench, Pune 6. गाड फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune ITA No.204/PUN/2021 Winjit Technologies Private Limited 5 Date 1. Draft dictated on 24-06-2022 Sr.PS 2. Draft placed before author 24-06-2022 Sr.PS 3. Draft proposed & placed before the second member JM 4. Draft discussed/approved by Second Member. JM 5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Sr.PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS 7. Date of uploading order Sr.PS 8. File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 10. Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11. Date of dispatch of Order. *