CA (INDIA) TECHNOLOGIES P.LTD, MUMBAI V. ITO RG 14(1)(2), MUMBAI

ITA 2046/MUM/2017

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 106 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1911 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 5 year(s) 3 month(s) 7 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 28-06-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: K
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 21-03-2017
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Section: 6; 143(3); 5(2)

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "K" BENCH, MUMBAI SHRI B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 2046/MUM/2017 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2012-13) CA (India) Technologies Private Limited, Ground Floor, Vibgyor Tower, Plot C-62, G-Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400051 [PAN: AAACC4971D] Income-Tax Officer, Mumbai, Range 14(1)(2), Mumbai .................. Vs .................. Appellant Respondent Appearances For the Appellant/ Assessee For the Respondent/Department : : Shri Yogesh Malpani Dr. Yogesh Kamat Date of conclusion of hearing Date of pronouncement of order : : 27.06.2022 29.06.2022 O R D E R Per Rahul Chaudhary, Judicial Member: 1. The present appeal is directed against assessment order dated, 24.01.2017 passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’] for the Assessment Year 2012-13, as per directions issued by Dispute Resolution Panel-1, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ‘the DRP’) under Section 144C(5) of the Act. ITA No. 2046/Mum/2017 Assessment Year: 2012-13 2 2. Ld. Authorised Representative for the Appellant appearing before us submitted that the Appellant has opted for settlement under the provisions of Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the DTVSV Act’). In this regard, the Ld. Authorised Representative for the Appellant placed on record order of full and final settlement of tax arrears under Section 5(2) read with Section 6 of the DTVSV Act in Form 5 [Acknowledgement No. 347467521140322]. In view of the aforesaid, the Ld. Authorised Representative for the Appellant requested for the withdrawal of the present appeal. The learned Departmental Representative did not have any objections to the aforesaid request. 3. In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced on 29.06.2022. Sd/- Sd/- ( B.R. Baskaran) Accountant Member (Rahul Chaudhary) Judicial Member म ुंबई Mumbai; दिन ुंक Dated : 29.06.2022 Alindra, PS आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपील र्थी / The Appellant 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 3. आयकर आय क्त(अपील) / The CIT(A)- 4. आयकर आय क्त / CIT 5. दिभ गीय प्रदिदनदि, आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण, म ुंबई / DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. ग र्ड फ ईल / Guard file. ITA No. 2046/Mum/2017 Assessment Year: 2012-13 3 आिेश न स र/ BY ORDER, सत्य दपि प्रदि //True Copy// उप/सह यक पुंजीक र /(Dy./Asstt. Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण, म ुंबई / ITAT, Mumbai