IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES : H NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.C. GUPTA , VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, A CCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO: 2 070 /DEL/20 1 3 A Y : - 200 8 - 09 UNITED HEAD HUNTERS PVT.LTD. VS. ITO, WARD 18(1) 3522/3, NARANG COLONY NEW DELHI TRI NAGAR NEW DELHI PAN: AAACU 0380 L (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SH. J.P.CHANDREKAR, SR.D.R. O R D E R PER J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER DT. 14.01.2013 OF LD.CIT(A) - XXI , NEW DELHI FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 200 9 - 10 . 2. ON THE DATE OF HEARING I.E. ON 04.08.2015 , INSPITE OF SERV ICE OF NOTICE, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION WAS RECEIVED. WE FIND FROM THE RECORD THAT ON EARLIER OCCASIONS ALSO THE APPEAL HAD BEEN ADJOURNED FOR NON - PROSECTUION . HENCE WE PRESUME THAT THE ASSESSEE IS N OT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. 2 3. FOLLOWING THE DECISIONS IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA P.LTD. 38 ITD, 320 (DELHI), AND THE DECISION OF THE HON BLE BOMBAY HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF M/S CHEMIPOL VS. UOI AND OTHERS IN CENTRAL EXCISE A PPEAL NO. 62/2009 JUDGEMENT DT. 17 TH SEPTEMBER,2009, WE CONSIDER IT A FIT CASE FOR DISMISSING THE APPEALS IN LIMINE, AS NOT ADMITTED. WE MAY LIKE TO CLARIFY THAT SUBSEQUENTLY, IF THE ASSESSEE EXPLAINS THE REASONS FOR NON - APPEARANCE AND IF THE BENCH IS S O SATISFIED, THE MATTER MAY BE RECALLED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADJUDICATION OF THE APPEAL. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE STANDS DISMISSED FOR NON - PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 07 TH AUGUST, 2015 . SD/ - SD/ - ( G.C. GUPTA ) (J.SUDHAKAR REDDY) VICE PRESIDENT ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: THE 07 TH AUGUST, 2015 *MANGA 3 COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT; 2.RESPONDENT; 3.CIT; 4.CIT(A); 5.DR; 6.GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASST. REGISTRAR