Shri Subodh Walia, Delhi V. Pr. CIT, New Delhi

ITA 2085/DEL/2017

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2937 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 10 month(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 23-02-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: G
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 07-04-2017
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: PRAKASH DUBEY
• Section: 263

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH G, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER DR. B. R. R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) ITA NO. 2085/DEL/2017 : ASSTT. YEAR : 2012-13 SHRI SUBODH WALIA, BJ-92, EAST SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088 VS PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-12, NEW DELHI (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN NO. AAEPW8409K ASSESSEE BY : SH. LALIT MOHAN, ADV. REVENUE BY : SH. PRAKASH DUBEY, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING: 23.02.2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 23.02.2021 ORDER PER DR. B. R. R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. PR.CIT, DELHI-12, NEW DELHI DA TED 20.03.2017. 2. DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING, THE LD. COUNSEL FO R THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT HE HAS THE INSTRUCTION TO W ITHDRAW THIS APPEAL AND FURNISHED APPLICATION WHEREIN IT WAS STA TED AS UNDER: HONBLE SIR(S), 1. THE CAPTIONED APPEAL PREFERRED BY ASSESSEE IS FIXED FOR HEARING TOADY I.E. 23.02.2021. 2. THAT UNDER THE INSTRUCTION OF SHRI M.L. PULYANI, CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT OF THE APPELLANT, IT IS SUBMIT TED THAT ORDER OF FRESH ASSESSMENT IN PURSUANCE OF AN ITA NO. 2085/DEL/2017 SUBODH WALIA 2 ORDER DATED 20.03.2017 U/S 263 OF THE ACT HAS NOT BEEN PASSED BY THE LEARNED ASSESSING OFFICER. 3. THE ASSESSEE THEREFORE SEEKS TO WITHDRAW HIS CAPTIONED APPEAL, WHICH MY KINDLY BE ALLOWED AS SUCH. 4. THE ASSESSEE SHALL BY HIGHLY GRATEFUL FOR KIND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PRAYER MENTIONED HERE-IN-ABOVE. YOURS SINCERELY, SD/- (LALIT MOHAN) COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE 3. THE LD. DR DID NOT OBJECT IF THE APPEAL OF THE A SSESSEE IS TO BE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 4. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 23/02/2021. SD/- SD/- (BHAVNESH SAINI) (DR . B. R. R. KUMAR) JUDICIAL MEMBER AC COUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 23/02/2021 *SUBODH* COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR