IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH, BANGALORE BEFORE S HRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 2 125 / BANG/20 1 7 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 20 11 - 12 ) KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, LA KAMANHALLI, P.B.ROAD, DHARWARD . PAN:BLRS22764A VS. APPELLANT INCOME - TAX OFFICER, TDS, WARD 1, HUBLI. RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI D.V.PRADEEP, ACIT(DR ) DATE OF HEARING : 29 / 01 /201 8 DATE OF PRONOUNCE MENT : 31 /0 1 /201 8 O R D E R PER I NTURI RAMA RAO, AM : THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) , HUBLI, DATED 03/07/2017 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 20 10 - 11 . 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING NONE WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AND EVEN THERE WAS NO REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT. THEREFORE, W E ARE OF THE OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING ITS CASE. THEREFORE, W E DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE FOR NON - PROSECUTION, FOLLOWING THE DECISION ITA NO . 2 12 5 /BANG/201 7 PAGE 2 OF 2 OF THE HON BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR V. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480 AS WELL AS THE ORDER OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE ITAT IN CIT V. MULTIPLAN INDIA P. LTD., (1991) 38 ITD 320. 03. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 31 ST JANUARY,2018 S D/ - SD/ - ( SUNIL KUMAR YADAV ) (INTURI RAMA RAO) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER PLACE : BANGALORE D A T E D : 31/ 01/2018 SRINIVASULU, SPS COPY TO : 1 APPELLANT 2 RESPONDENT 3 CIT(A) 4 CIT 5 DR, ITAT, BANGALORE. 6 GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR INCOME - TA X APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE