IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH A: NEW DELHI BEFORE, SHRI G. S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBE I.T.A NO.2128/DEL/2017 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13) MRS. ANU MAHAJAN, B-61, NEW RAJINDER NAGAR, NEW DELHI-110 060. PAN-AKPPM 7994N VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-50(3), NEW DELHI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY SH. DHARENDRA KUMAR, CA. RESPONDENT BY SH. PRAKASH DUBEY, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING 13.01.2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 13.01 2021 ORDER PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JM: THIS APPEAL IS PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST OR DER DATED 06.02.2017 PASSED BY THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-17, NEW DELHI {CIT(A)} FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13. 2.0 THE LD. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (AR) SUB MITS THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE RELATING T O THE TAX ARREARS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION UNDER T HE DIRECT TAX 2 ITA NO.2128/DEL/2017 MRS. ANU MAHAJAN VS . ITO VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020. IT HAS BEEN STATED THAT THE NECESSARY DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 4 OF THE DIRE CT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AN D SUBSEQUENTLY, FORM-III HAS ALSO BEEN RECEIVED BY THE ASSESSEE. 3.0 CONSIDERING THE AFORESAID SITUATION, THE CAPTIONED APPEAL IS CONSIGNED TO THE RECORDS AND TREATED AS DISMISSED. 4.0 IN VIEW OF THE AFORESAID, THE APPEAL IS CONSI GNED TO THE RECORDS AND, FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES, IS TREATED AS DISMIS SED. ABOVE DECISION WAS ANNOUNCED ON CONCLUSION OF VIRTU AL HEARING ON 13 TH JANUARY, 2021. SD/- S D/- (G.S.PANNU) (SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED:13/01/2021 PK/PS COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI