, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI B.P. JAIN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ ITA.NO.2136/AHD/2013 / ASSTT. YEAR: 2005-2006 M/S.PRIYADARSHINI FASHIONS P.LTD. C/O. SUNIL KEDIA 210-B, 21 ST CENTURY BUINESS CENTRE NR. UDHAN DARWAJA RING ROAD, SURAT 395 002. PAN : AABCP 4190 J VS ITO, WARD-1(4) SURAT. ! / (APPELLANT) '# ! / (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : PRAJNA PARAMITA, SR.DR / DATE OF HEARING : 19/02/2016 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 19/02/2016 $%/ O R D E R THE ASSESSEE IS IN APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AGAIN ST THE ORDER OF THE LD.CIT(A)-I, SURAT DATED 21.6.2013 PASSED FOR THE A SSTT.YEAR 2005-2006. 2 . AT THE TIME OF HEARING, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF O F THE ASSESSEE. THE CASE HAS BEEN FIRSTLY LISTED FOR HEARING ON 4 TH JULY, 2014. THEREAFTER, THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED FROM TIME TO TIME. ON 1.12.2015, AT THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE, THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED TO 5.1.2016. ON 2 9.1.2016 AS PER THE ORDER- SHEET CERTAIN DIRECTIONS HAVE BEEN GIVEN TO THE LD .AR FOR COLLECTING REASONS RECORDED FOR THE REOPENING OF THE ASSESSMENT FROM T HE AO, SURAT. ON ITA NO.2136/AHD/2013 2 19.2.2016 ALSO NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSES SEE AT THE TIME OF HEARING NOR FILED ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT OF THE CA SE OR INTIMATED ANY REASON FOR NON-ATTENDANCE. THIS SHOWS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT SERIOUS IN PURSUING WITH THIS APPEAL, AND THEREFORE, BY FOLLOWING THE D ECISION OF THE ITAT DELHI BENCH IN CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DELHI), I DISMISS THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE . 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 19 TH FEBRUARY, 2016 AT AHMEDABAD. SD/- ( B.P. JAIN ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER