ITA NO.2138/MUM/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2007 - 08 PAGE 1 OF 3 INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI D BENCH, MUMBAI [CORAM: PRAMOD KUMAR (VICE PRESIDENT) AND C.N PRASAD (JUDICIAL MEMBER)] ITA NO.2138/MUM/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2007 - 08 M/S. MITHALA SHELTER & POWER LTD., .. APPELLANT 1 ST FLOOR, SHANTI NIWAS, NEW GOLDEN NEST PHASE XIII, 100 FEET ROAD, OPP. HANUMAN MANDIR, BHAYANDER(E), THANE 401105 [PAN: AAECA4425E] VS. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE (3) THANE. .RESPONDENT APPEARANCES: VIMAL PUNNIYA FOR THE APPELLANT BHARAT ANDHLE FOR THE RESPONDENT DATE OF CONCLUDING THE HEARING: : DECEMBER 31 ST , 2020 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : JANUARY 04 TH , 2021 O R D E R PER PRAMOD KUMAR, VP: 1. BY WAY OF THIS APPEAL, THE ASSESSEE APPELLANT HAS CHALLENGED CORRECTNESS OF THE EX - PARTE ORDER DATED 14 TH JUNE 2018 , PASSED BY THE LD. CIT(A) IN THE MATTER OF RECTIFICATION OF MISTAKE U/S. 154 R .W.S 143(3) AND 153A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007 - 08 . ITA NO.2138/MUM/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2007 - 08 PAGE 2 OF 3 2. WHEN THIS APPEAL CAME UP FOR HEARING IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF APPEALS, IS PASSED EX - PARTE I.E ., WITHOUT HEARING THE ASSESSEE APPELLANT. THE HE FURTHER, ASSURED US THAT HE WILL FULLY COOPERATE IN EXPEDITIO US DISPOSAL OF THE APPEAL BY THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE WAS, THEREFORE, ASKED AS TO WHY HE DID NOT APPEARED BEFORE THE LEARNED CIT(A). IN REPLY TO THIS QUESTION, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT ON THE SAME DATE OF HEARING HE HAD A PPEARED BEFORE THE LEARNED CIT(A) IN OTHER MATTERS AND ITS SEEMS THAT THERE WERE SOME CONFUSION ABOUT THE HEARING OF THIS APPEAL. HE WAS VERY MUCH PRESENT BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER APPEALS THOUGH THE MATTER WAS NOT TAKEN UP FOR SOME REASON. THE LEARNED COUNS EL SUBMITS THAT IN THE EVENT OF THE MATTER BEING REMITTED BACK TO THE FILE OF THE LEARNED CIT(A), HE WILL THE CONTEND BY THE SAME AND MAKE HIS SUBMISSIONS BEFORE THE LEARNED CIT(A). HE FURTHER, ASSURED US THAT HE WILL FULLY COOPERATE IN EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSA L OF THE APPEAL BY THE LEARNED CIT(A). 3. THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE, SUBMITS THAT HE HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE MATTER BEING REMITTED TO THE FILE OF THE LEARNED CIT(A). 4 . IN VIEW OF THESE DISCUSSIONS, AS ALSO BEARING IN MIND ENTIRETY OF THE CASE, WE DEEM IT FIT AND PROPER TO REMIT THE MATTER TO THE FILE OF THE LEARNED CIT(A), FOR ADJUDICATION DENOVO AFTER GIVING YET ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY OF HEARING TO THE ASSESSEE APPELLANT. W E ALSO DEEM IT FIT TO DIRECT THE LEARNED COUNSEL TO APPROACH THE OFFI CE OF THE LEARNED CIT(A), ALONG WITH A COPY OF THIS ORDER , WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RECEIVING THIS ORDER , AND ASCERTAIN THE DATE OF HEARING AS A RESULT OF THE MATTER BEING RESTORED TO THE FILE OF THE LEARNED CIT(A). ORDER ED , ACCORDINGLY. 5 . IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL IS ALLOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPO SE IN THE TERMS INDICATE ABOVE. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT TODAY ON THE 04 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021 SD/ - SD/ - C.N PRASAD PRAMOD KUMAR (JUDICIAL MEMBER) (VICE PRESIDENT) MUMBAI, DATED THE 04 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021 N.V, SR. PS COPIES TO: (1) THE APPLICANT (2) THE RESPONDENT (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) DR (6) GUARD FILE ITA NO.2138/MUM/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2007 - 08 PAGE 3 OF 3 BY ORDER TRUE COPY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI