Shri Maulik P.Vyas, Baroda V. The Income tax Officer,Ward-2(3), Baroda

ITA 2139/AHD/2011

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 94509 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 year(s) 1 month(s) 13 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 12-10-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 12-10-2015
• Assessment Year: 2005-2006
• Appeal Filed On: 30-08-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: NARENDRA SINGH
• Keywords: Reasonable cause

Judgement Text

, B IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE S/SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JM & MANISH BORAD, AM ./ ITA NO.2139/AHD/2011 / ASSTT. YEAR: 2005-06 SHRI MAULIK P. VYAS, 37-38, PARICHAY PARK, NR. J.P. POLICE STATION, OLD PADRA ROAD, BARODA. PAN :ADIPV 2526M VS INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3), BARODA. ! / (APPELLANT) '# ! / (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI NARENDRA SINGH, SR.DR / DATE OF HEARING : 12/10/2015 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 12/10/2015 $%/ O R D E R PER MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THIS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST ORDER OF THE CIT(A)-I II, BARODA, DATED 23.05.2011 FOR ASSTT.YEAR 2005-06. 2. ON REQUEST OF LD. AR ON 26.8.2015, THE HEARING O F THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED TO 12.10.2015. WHEN THE CASE WAS CALLED F OR HEARING NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AND NEITHER ANY ADJOURNMENT PETITION WAS FILED. THIS SHOWS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT SERIOUS IN PURSUING WITH THIS APPEAL, AND THEREFORE, BY FOLLOW ING THE DECISION OF THE ITAT IN CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 I TD 320 (DELHI), WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE . IT(SS)A NO122/AHD/2011 2 3. THE ASSESSEE MAY, IF SO ADVISED, FILE AN APPLICA TION BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL FOR RESTORATION OF ITS APPEAL AND HEARING ON MERITS BY SHOWING REASONABLE CAUSE FOR NOT APPEARING BEFORE THE TRIBU NAL ON THE DATE OF HEARING. THE BENCH, IF SO SATISFIED, MAY RECALL IT S ORDER AND RESTORE THE APPEAL TO ITS ORIGINAL NUMBER FOR HEARING ON MERITS . 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED IN LIMINE . ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 12/10/2015 AT AHME DABAD. SD/- SD/- (RAJPAL YADAV) JUDICIAL MEMBER (MANISH BORAD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 12/102015 $% & ''() *$)' / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. ! / CONCERNED CIT 4. ! ( ) / THE CIT(A), AHMEDABAD 5. $%& '' , , )*++ / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. &,- . / GUARD FILE. $% + / BY ORDER, ,/ - ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, AHMEDABAD 1. DATE OF DICTATION- 12/10/2015 2. DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER : 12/10/2015 3. DATE ON WHICH THE APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR.P. S./P.S. - 4. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER IS PLACED BEFORE THE D ICTATING MEMBER FOR PRONOUNCEMENT : 5. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE BENCH CLERK : 12/10/2015 6. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK . 7. THE DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE ASSISTANT RE GISTRAR FOR SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER.. 8. DATE OF DESPATCH OF THE ORDER