Manak Devi Barmecha, CHENNAI V. ACIT, CHENNAI

ITA 2140/CHNY/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2017] 128 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4954 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 8 month(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 03-04-2017
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 06-06-2017
• Assessment Year: 2003-2004
• Appeal Filed On: 18-07-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: B SAHADEVAN IRS

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A (SMC) BENCH : CHENNAI . , [BEFORE SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT M EMBER ] ./I.T.A. NO. 2140/MDS/2016 / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2003-2004 MANAK DEVI BARMECHA, C/O. OSTWAL & ASSOCIATES, C.AS 43, STROTTEN MUTHIA MUDALI STREET, 1 ST FLOOR, SOWCARPET, CHENNAI 600 079. [PAN AFSPM 6787R] VS. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE XI, CHENNAI ( !' / APPELLANT) ( #$!' /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : NONE /RESPONDENT BY : SHRI. B. SAHADEVAN, IRS, JCIT. /DATE OF HEARING : 03-04-2017 !' /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 03-04-2017 % / O R D E R WHEN THE APPEAL WAS CALLED UP FOR HEARING, NONE A PPEARED ON BEHALF OF ASSESSEE. DESPITE ISSUE OF NOTICE TO THE ADDRESS GIVEN IN FORM NO.36, NO AUTHORIZED PERSON HAS APPEARED ON BE HALF OF THE ASSESSEE. IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, I AM OF THE OPINIO N THAT THE ASSESSEE ITA NO. 2140/MDS/2016 :- 2 -: IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE CASE. FOLLOWI NG THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF CIT V. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. (38 ITD 320) (DEL), I DISMISS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE, FOR NO N- PROSECUTION. 2. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMI SSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 2017, AT CHENNAI. SD/- ( . ) (ABRAHAM P. GEORGE) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER #$ / CHENNAI %& / DATED:3RD APRIL, 2017 KV &' ()*) / COPY TO: 1 . / APPELLANT 3. +,- / CIT(A) 5. )./ 0 / DR 2. / RESPONDENT 4. + / CIT 6. /12 / GF