Appeal Details
Counselvise Citation
[2019] 116 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1747 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
Assessee PAN
Bench
Appeal Number
CRN Number
Duration Of Justice
4 year(s) 1 month(s) 15 day(s)
Appellant
Respondent
Appeal Type
Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date
29-05-2019
Appeal Filed By
Assessee
Order Result
Partly Allowed
Bench Allotted
K
Assessment Year
2010-2011
Appeal Filed On
13-04-2015
Judgement Text
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL K , BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI C.N. PRASAD, JM & SHRI M.BALAGANESH, AM ITA NO. 2 1 62 / MUM/20 1 5 ( ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2010 - 11 ) M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED 247 PARK, HINCON HOUSE B WING, 8 TH FLOOR, LBS MARG, VIKHROLI (W) MUMBAI 400 083 MAHARASHTRA VS. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 14(1)(1), MUMBAI PAN/GIR NO. AACCA9694B ( APPELLANT ) .. ( RESPONDENT ) ASSESSEE BY SHRI M.P. LOHIA REVENUE BY SHRI CHAITANYA ANJARIA DATE OF HEARING 26 / 04 /201 9 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 29 / 05 /201 9 / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M) : THIS APPEAL IN ITA NO. 2162/MUM/2018 FOR A.Y. 2010 - 11 A RISES OUT OF THE ORDER BY THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PANEL - IV, MUMBAI IN OBJECTI ON NO.153 DATED 19/12/2014 (LD. DRP IN SHORT) AGAINST THE ORDER OF ASSESSMENT PASSED U/S.143(3) R.W.S. 144C(13) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS ACT) DATED 30/01/2015 BY THE LD. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 14(1)(2), MUMBAI (HERE INAFTER REFERRED TO AS LD. AO). ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 2 2. THE GROUND NOS. 1 & 2 RAISED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE GENERAL IN NATURE AND DO NOT REQUIRE ANY SPECIFIC ADJUDICATION. 2.1. DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING, THE LD. AR STATED THAT GROUNDS NO.3 TO 5 RAISED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE NOT PRESSED BY HIM . THE SAME IS RECKONED AS A STATEMENT MADE FROM THE BAR AND HENCE THE SAME ARE DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED. 2.2. GROUND NO.6 RAISED BY THE ASSESSEE IS WITH REGARD TO THE ACTION OF THE LD. DRP UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF LD. TPO BY CONSIDERING CERTA IN ADDITIONAL COMPARABLES WHICH ARE FUNCTIONALLY DIFFERENT WITH THAT OF THE ASSESSEE FOR THE PURPOSE OF BENCHMARKING THE INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSESSEE FURTHER ELABORATED GROUND NO.6 BY SPECIFICALLY MENTIONING THE NAME OF COMPARAB LES BY WAY OF SEPARATE GROUNDS IN GROUND NOS.20 TO 23 AS UNDER: - GROUND NO.20: - IN RESPECT OF COMPARABLE TSR DARASHAH LTD., GROUND NO.21: - IN RESPECT OF COMPARABLE APITCO LTD., GROUND NO.22: - IN RESPECT OF COMPARABLE GLOBAL PROCUREMENT CONSULTANT LTD. , GROUND NO.23: - IN RESPECT OF COMPARABLE HCCA BUSINESS SERVICES PVT. LTD., 3. THE BRIEF FACTS OF THIS ISSUE ARE THAT THE ASSESSEE COMPANY IS ENGAGED IN PROVIDING LOCAL LOGISTICS OF FREIGHT FORWARDING SERVICES IN INDIA WHICH INCLUDES CARGO CONSULTATION SERVICES, INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT FORWARDING SERVICES, WAREHOUSING MANAGEMENT SERVICES AND OTHER LOCAL LOGISTIC SUPPORT SERVICES. THE ASSESSEE IS A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF APL LOGISTICS LTD. SINGAPORE (APLL, SINGAPORE IN SHORT) WHICH IS PART OF THE NEPTU NE ORIENT LINES GROUP (NOL GROUP). THE FREIGHT TRAFFIC ESPECIALLY COMPRISES OUT BOUND OR EXPORT SHIPMENTS (VIZ ORIGINATING IN INDIA AND DESTINED FOR A LOCATION OUTSIDE INDIA) AND INBOUND OR IMPORT SHIPMENTS (VIZ ORIGINATING OUTSIDE INDIA AND DESTINED FOR INDIA). DURING ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 3 THE YEAR ENDING 31/03/2010, THE ASSESSEE HAS ENTERED INTO FOLLOWING INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS AS ITS ASSOCIATED ENTERPRISES (AES IN SHORT). SR.NO. NATURE OF INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTION VALUE OF TRA N SACTION (RS.) METHOD USED 1 PAYMENT OF BAL ANCE TRANSPORTATION FEES (NETWORK FEES) TO APLL SINGAPORE 115,681,483 TNMM 2 FREIGHT CHARGES IN RESPECT OF INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT FORWARDING SHI PMENTS PAID BY THE ASSESSEE IN I NDIA ON BEHALF OF APLL SINGAPORE 185,182,967 REFER NOTE 1 BELOW 3 CHARGES IN RE SPECT OF INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT FORWARDING SHIPMENTS COLLECTED BY THE ASSESSEE FROM THE SHIPPERS (EXPORTER)/ CONSIGNEES OF AES 281,630,514 REFER NOTE 2 BELOW 4 CHARGES IN RESPECT OF INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT FORWARDING SHIPMENTS COLLECTED BY AES FROM CONSIGNEE S (IMPORTER) / SHIPPERS (EXPORTER) OUTSIDE INDIA ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE 143,479,830 REFER NOTE 3 BELOW 5 RECEIVED FROM APLL SINGAPORE AND API CPL ..SINGAPORE AGAINST SALE OF INVESTMENT 761,888,994 VALUATION REPORT 6 PAYMENT FOR BUSINESS ADMINISTRATI ON SERVICES TO APLL SINGAPORE 4,760,500 TNMM TOTAL 1,492,624,288 1 ) THESE RECOVERIES DO NOT INCLUDE PROVISION OF SERVICES AND THE ACTUAL COST INCURRED IS RECEIVABLE FROM THE AE. BASED THEREON, THE AMOUNT RECEIVED/RECEIVABLE IS AT ARM'S LENGTH. 2 ) THESE AMOU NTS ARE COLLECTED BY THE ASSESSEE ON BEHALF OF THE AES. BASED THEREON, THE AMOUNT PAID I PAYABLE IS AT ARM'S LENGTH. 3 ) THESE AMOUNTS ARE COLLECTED BY THE AES ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. BASED THEREON, THE AMOUNT RECEIVED/RECEIVABLE IS AT ARM'S LENGTH. ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 4 3.1. THE ASSESSEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCAL LOGISTICS AND FREIGHT FORWARDING SUPPORT SERVICES IN INDIA (SUCH AS ORIGINATION SERVICES FOR SHIPMENTS ORIGINATED IN INDIA TO DELIVER OUTSIDE INDIA AND DESTINED SERVICES FOR SHIPMENTS ORIGINATED OUTSIDE INDIA TO DELIVE R IN INDIA). SIMILARLY OTHER ASSOCIATED ENTERPRISES OF THE ASSESSEE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT AND OVERSEAS SUPPORT SERVICES IN THEIR COUNTRIES (SUCH AS DESTINED SERVICES FOR SHIPMENT ORIGINATED FROM INDIA TO DELIVER OUTSIDE INDIA AND ORIGIN ATION SERVICES FOR SHIPMENT ORIGINATED OUTSIDE INDIA TO DELIVER IN INDIA). IN RELATION TO ABOVE, THE ASSESSEE HAD ENTERED INTO INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT SERVICES AGREEMENT AND CONSULTATION SERVICES AGREEMENT DATED 01/01/2009 WITH APLL SINGAPORE. IN THE TRANSFE R PRICING DOCUMENTATION, THE ASSESSEE HAS ADOPTED T RANSACTIONAL N ET M ARGIN M ETHOD (TNMM) AS THE M OST A PPROPRIATE M ETHOD (MAM) TO BENCHMARK ITS INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS. THE NET COST PLUS (NCP) WAS SELECTED AS THE P ROFIT L EVEL I NDICATOR (PLI) . IN THE TP S TUDY REPORT , IT IS MENTIONED THAT ASSESSEE OPTS AS A LOW RISK LOGISTICS AND FREIGHT FORWARDING SUPPORT SERVICES PROVIDER BEING INSULATED FROM ALL KINDS OF BUSINESS AND OPERATIONAL RISKS AND ENTREPRENEURIAL THIRD PARTY SERVICE PROVIDER. ON THE OTHER HAND , MARKETS ITS SERVICES THEREBY INCURRING SUBSTANTIAL EXPENSES ON ACCOUNT OF SUCH MARKETING AND SALES PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES. THE WEIGHTED AVERAGE NCP EARNED BY COMPARABLE INDEPENDENT COMPAN IES IN LOGISTICS AND FREIGHT FORWARDING SUPPORT SERVICES WORKED OUT T O ARITHMETICAL MEAN OF 3.43%. THE ASSESSEE EARNED NCP OF 5% FROM ITS LOGISTICS AND FREIGHT FORWARDING SUPPORT SERVICES. SINCE, THE ASSESSEES MARGIN WAS HIGHER THAN THE COMPARABLES MARGIN, THE ASSESSEE CONCLUDED THAT THE TRANSACTIONS UNDERTAKEN BY IT WERE AT ARMS LENGTH. THE ASSESSEE ALSO MENTIONED IN THE TP STUDY REPORT THAT SINCE NCP EARNED BY THE ASSESSEE WERE ABOVE THE ARITHMETICAL MEAN OF THE NCP OF COMPARABLES, THE ASSESSEE DID NOT MAKE ANY RISK ADJUSTMENTS BUT HOWEVER RESERVED ITS RIGHT TO CLAIM THE SAME AS AND WHEN NECESSARY . THE ASSESSEE DURING THE COURSE OF ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 5 PROCEEDINGS FROM THE LD. TPO PROVIDED THE UPDATED NCP MARGIN OF THE COMPARABLES BASED ON SINGLE YEAR DATA WHEREIN THE AVERAGE MARGIN WAS ARRIVED AT 2.84%. THIS WAS SUBMITTED TO THE LD. TPO VIDE LETTER DATED 06/09/2013. 3.2. THE LD. TPO ON GOING THROUGH THE FINANCIALS OF THE ASSESSEE OBSERVED THAT ASSESSEE HAS SHOWN FOLLOWING AMOUNTS AS PASS THROUGH COSTS AND THESE COSTS HAVE NOT BEEN TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT WHILE DETERMINING THE MARK - UP. THE ASSESSEE WAS ASKED TO EXPLAIN WHY THESE TRANSACTIONS HAVE BEEN SHOWN AS PASS THROUGH COSTS AND NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING THE MARK - UP ON COST: - SR. NO. NATURE OF INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTION VALUE OF TRANSACTION (RS.) 2 FREIGHT C HARGES IN RESPECT OF INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT FORWARDING SHIPMENTS PAID BY THE ASSESSEE IN INDIA ON BEHALF OF APLL SINGAPORE 185,182,967 3 CHARGES IN RESPECT OF INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT FORWARDING SHIPMENTS COLLECTED BY THE ASSESSEE FROM THE SHIPPERS {EXPORT ER}/ CONSIGNEES (IMPORTER) IN INDIA ON BEHALF OF AES 281,630,514 4 CHARGES IN RESPECT OF INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT FORWARDING SHIPMENTS COLLECTED BY AES FROM CONSIGNEES (IMPORTER) / SHIPPERS (EXPORTER) OUTSIDE INDIA ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE 143,479,830 3.3. THE ASSESSEE EXPLAINED BEFORE THE LD. TPO THAT IN THE AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO WITH AE, PASS THROUGH COST HAS BEEN DEFINED AS UNDER: - 'PASS THROUGH COST' MEANS PAYMENTS MADE FOR THE ACCOUNT OF OTHER PARTIES, EXAMPLE OF PASS THROUGH COSTS ARE TERMINAL HANDLE COSTS (THC), INSURANCE COSTS, IMPORT DUTIES, FREIGHT (IN/OUT) AND ANY COSTS THAT WOULD BE CLASSIFIED UNDER GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES (GAAP) AS CONTRA - REVENUE AND COST OF GOODS SOLD.' 3.4. THE ASSESSEE EXPLAINED BEFORE THE LD. TP O AS UNDER: - ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 6 THE ASSESSEE IS PAID FOR TRANSPORTING THE GOODS FROM THE CUSTOMER'S LOCATION TO THE WAREHOUSE AND FROM WAREHOUSE TO THE PORT THE ASSESSEE IS PAID FOR THE JOB AS PER THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT, WHICH IS COST PLUS 5 %. THE SHIPS ARE OWNED BY AE AND 3 RD PARTIES. THE SHIPPING LINE DELIVERS THE GOODS AT THE DESTINATION PORT . THE ASSESSEE COLLECTS THE SHIPPING FREIGHT ON BEHALF OF THE AE FROM THE EXPORTER CUSTOMER WHICH IS TREATED AS PASS THROUGH THE COST AS PER AGREEMENT. AN AMOUNT OF RS. 281,63 0,514 ARE CHARGES IN RESPECT OF INTERNATIONAL . FREIGHT FORWARDING SHIPMENTS COLLECTED BY THE ASSESSEE FROM THE SHIPPERS / CONSIGNEES IN INDIA ON BEHALF OF AES. OUT OF THESE RS. 281 , 630 , 514 DEPENDING UPON THE CUSTOMER CONTRACT, APLL INDIA WOULD EI THER PAY THE FREIGHT CHARGES TO THE SHIPPING TINES IN INDIA OR WOULD REMIT IT TO THE AE ON WHOSE BEHALF IT HAS COLLECTED THE FREIGHT CHARGES. DURING THE YEAR , A SSESSEE HAS PAID RS. 185,182,967/ - TO SHIPPING LINES IN INDIA. SOMETIMES THE EXPORTER ASKS TH E ASSESSEE THAT THE SHIPPING FREIGHT WOULD BE PAID TO THE CONSIGNEE SO THE AE COLLECTS SHIPPING ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE FOR PAYMENT TO SHIPPING LINES. SUCH AMOUNT IS RS. 143,479,830 . THE DELIVERY OF THE GOODS FROM DESTINATION PORT TO THE CUSTOMER'S LO CATION IS PERFORMED BY THE AES AND IS NEITHER COLLECTED BY THE ASSESSEE NOR IS REFLECTED IN ASSESSEE'S ACCOUNT. ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 7 3.5. FURTHER, V IDE SUBMISSION DATED 6 SEPTEMBER 2013, IT WAS SUBMITTED THA T ASSESSEE HAD COLLECTED CERTAIN FREIGHT AND OTHER CHARGES IN RESPECT OF INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT FORWARDING SHIPMENT FROM THE SHIPPERS / CONSIGNEES IN INDIA ON BEHALF OF ITS AES. SIMILARLY, AE'S HAD COLLECTED CERTAIN FREIGHT AND OTHER CHARGES IN RESPECT OF INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT FORWARDING SHIPMENTS FROM THE SHIPPERS / CONSIGN EES IN THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNTRIES ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. FURTHER, THE ASSESSEE HAD PAID CERTAIN FREIGHT CHARGES IN RESPECT OF INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT FORWARDING SHIPMENTS IN INDIA ON BEHALF OF APLL SINGAPORE, THESE TRANSACTIONS ARE UNDERTAKEN PURELY FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONVENIENCE. 3.6. THERE IS NEITHER AN ELEMENT OF ANY PROVISION OF SERVICES NOR AN INTENTION OF PROVIDING ANY DIRECT OR PROXIMATE BENEFIT T O EITHER OF THE PARTIES. ANY BENEFIT ARISING TO THE ASSESSEE OR ITS AES IS PURELY INCIDENTAL AND THE C OST OF SUCH BENEFIT, IF ANY, WOULD NOT BE SIGNIFICANT. IN VIEW OF THE SAME AND HAVING REGARD TO THE FACT THAT THE TRANSACTIONS WERE UNDERTAKEN ON A COST TO COST BASIS, THESE INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN THE NATURE OF ADMINISTRATIVE CONVENIENCES SHOULD NOT REQUIRE A SEPARATE ANALYSIS AND IS CONSIDERED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ARM'S LENGTH STANDARD. 3.7. IN THE TRANSFER PRICING STUDY OF ASSESSEE SUBMITTED VIDE LET TER DATED 22 AUGUST 2013, I T WAS SUBMITTED THAT APLL INDIA'S IS COMPENSATED ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 8 FOR LOCAL LOGISTI CS AND FREIGHT FORWARDING SUPPORT SERVICES WITH MARK - UP OF FIVE PERCENT ON THE COSTS INCURRED IN DELIVERING THE SERVICES . THE REVENUE IN EXCESS OF COSTS PLUS AN ARM'S LENGTH MA RK - UP OF FIVE PERCENT, IF ANY, IS REMITTED TO APLL SINGAPORE AS A NETWORK FEE F O R ITS ROLE AS THE PRINCIPAL AN D ENTREPRENEURIAL RISK TAKER AND ITS LEADERSHIP RELATING TO THE STRATEGIC PLANNING AN D MANAGEMENT OF THE GLOBAL LOGISTICS BUSINESS AND PROVISION OF CERTAIN CENTRALIZ ED SERVICES IN THE STRUCTURE. FURTHER, IT WAS SUBMITTED THAT THE NETWORK FEE IS NOT A PAYMENT MADE BY APLL INDIA FOR USE OF ANY PATENT, TRADEMARK, OR OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OWNED BY APLL SINGAPORE. RATHER, THE NETWORK FEE IS INTENDED TO ENSURE THAT APLL INDIA DELIVERING GLOBAL LOGISTICS SERVICES ON BEHALF OF AP LL SINGAPORE IS REMUNERATED ON COST + 5 % , WHILST AT THE SAME TIME ENSURING THAT ANY AMOUNT THAT MAY BE REALIZED BY APLL INDIA IN EXCESS OF SUCH AN ARM'S - LENGTH RETURN (IF RELEVANT) ACCRUE TO APLL SINGAPORE, AS THE PRINCIPAL AND ENTREPRENEURIAL RISK TAKER IN THE STRUCTURE. 3.8. DURING THE YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION, THE ASSESSEE PAID NETWORK FEE AMOUNTING TO RS, 115,681,4 83 TO APLL SINGAPORE WHICH IS CALCULATED IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER . PARTICULAR S AMOUNT (RS.) TOTAL REVENUE (FROM JFS AND CONSOLIDATION BUSI NESS) WITHOUT PASS THROUGH COST A 57,07,88,484 OPERATING COSTS (I.E. BASE COST AS DEFINED IN THE IPS AND CONSOLIDATION SERVICE AGREEMENT) B 43,34,35,239 .ADD: MARK - UP OF 5% C 2,16,71.762 ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 9 D=B+C 45,51,07,001 NETWORK FEE A - D 11,56,81,483 PARTICULARS FY 2009 - 10 OPERATING INCOME (A) 455,107,001 OPERATING EXPENSES (B) 433,435,239 ADJUSTED NET PROFIT (A - B = C) 21,671,762 ADJUSTED NCP (C/B) 5% 3.9. THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED BEFORE THE LD. TPO FURTHER AS UNDER: - THE ASSESSES HA S BENCH MARKED THE TRANSACTION BY TNMM ASSESSEE IS THE TESTED PARTY. PLI IS OPERATION PROFIT/COST . THE ASSESSEE SEARCHED FOR COMPARABLES ON PROWESS AND CAPITALINE IN THE TRANSFER PRICING STUDY, WHO ARE ENGAGED IN SHIPPING SERVICES, CARGO HANDLING, LOGI STIC, ROAD FREIGHT AND TRANSPORT SERVICES AND SELECTED 12 COMPARABLES ON THE BASIS OF THEIR BUSINESS ACTIVITIES, TURNOVER / REVENUE AND PROFITABILITY EARNED BY THEM. 3.10. THE ASSESSEE SELECTED 12 COMPARABLES AND ARRIVED AT THE UPDATED ARITHMETICAL MEAN MARGIN OF 2.84% AS AVERAGE OF 12 COMPARABLES. THE ASSESSEE EARNED MARGIN OF 5% AND SINCE THE SAME WAS HIGHER THAN 2.84% AS AVERAGE OF 12 COMPARABLES, THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT ITS PRICING IS AT ARMS LENGTH. ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 10 3.11. THE LD. TPO OBSERVED IN HIS ORDER THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS COLLECTED TOTAL REVENUE OF RS.57.07 CRORES, OUT OF WHICH THE OPERATING COST OF THE ASSESSEE IS RS.43.34 CRORES. THE REMAINING PROFIT WHICH IS TO BE SHARED BETWEEN THE ASSESSEE AND THE AE I S RS. 13.73 CORES, OUT OF WHICH RS.2.18 CRORES IS R ETAINED BY THE ASSESSEE, WHICH C OMES T O 15.73%. AN AMOUNT OF RS. 11.56 CRORES IS RETAINED BY THE AE WHICH IS 84.17% OF THE TOTAL REVENUE AS SHOWN BELOW : - PARTICULARS AMOUNT (RS.) TOTAL REVENUE (FROM IFS AND CONSOLIDATION BUSINESS) WITHOUT PASS THROUGH COST A 57,07,88,484 OPERATING COSTS (I.E. BASE COST AS DEFINED IN THE IPS AND CONSOLIDATION SERVICE AGREEMENT) B 43,34,35,239 ADD: MARK - UP OF 5% C 2.16,71.762 D=B+ C 45,51,07,001 NETWORK FEE A~D 11,56,81,483 3.12. THE LD. TPO ANALYSE D THE VARIOUS FUNCTIONS PERFORMED BY APLL SINGA P ORE (AE AND THE ASSESSEE TOGETHER WITH VARIOUS SERVICES RENDERED THEREON AND FURTHER ASSETS EMPLOYED AND THE RISKS ASSUMED BY BOTH THE PARTIES. THE LD. TPO OBSERVED THAT FROM THE ANALYSIS GIVEN IN THE TP STUD Y REPORT , IT IS SEEN THAT ASSESSEE IS NOT SIMPLY DOING TRANSPORTATION JOB BU T PERFORMING VARIOUS OTHER FUNCTIONS LIKE MARKET AND BUSINESS SUPPORT, ADMINISTRATIVE, FINANCE, HUMAN RESOURCE, VENDOR MANAGEMENT, CUSTOMER ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 11 RELATIONSHIP ON BEHALF OF THE AE. ABOVE ALL , THE ASSESSEE IS INSTRUMENTAL IN ASSISTING THE AE FOR BUSINESS AMOUNTING TO RS.28 CRORES AND 14 CRORES WHICH IS A PASS THROUGH COST FOR THE ASSESSEE. THE LD. TPO ADDED 5 MORE COMPARABLES WITH THE COMPARABLES CHOSEN BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE PURPOSE OF BE NCHMARKING ITS INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASSESSEE: - I. APTICO LTD., II. GLOBAL PROCUREMENT CONSULTANTS LTD., III. IDC (INDIA) LTD., (CYBER MEDIA RESEARCH LTD.) IV. TSR DARASHAW LTD., V. HCCA BUSINESS SERVICES PVT. LTD., 3.13. THE TPO ARRIVED AT TH E FINAL MARGIN OF ALL COMPARABLES AT 14.66% AND ACCORDINGLY MADE AN ADJUSTMENT OF RS.4,18,69,844/ - TO ARMS LENGTH PRICE AS UNDER: - PARTICULARS AS PER ASSESSEE AMOUNT (RS,) AS PER TPO AMOUNT (RS,) TOTAL REVENUE (FROM IPS AND CONSOLIDATION BUSINESS) WITHOUT PASS THROUGH COST A 57,07,88,484 57,07,83,484 OPERATING COSTS (I.E. BASE COST AS DEFINED IN THE IPS AND CONSOLIDATION SERVICE AGREEMENT) B 43,34,35,239 43,34,35,239 | ADD: MARK - UP OF 5% (14.66%) C 2,16,71,762 6 , 35 , 41,606 PROFIT RETAI NED BY THE ASSESSES 21 , 67 , 17 , 621 ADJUSTMENT 4 , 18 , 69 , 844 FEE PAID TO THE AE D=B+C 45.51,07,001 49,69,76.845 NETWORK FEE PAYABLE TO THE AE A - D 11,56,81,483 7,38,11,639 ADJUSTMENT 4,18,69,844 ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 12 3.14. THE LD. DRP GRANTED P ARTIAL RELIEF TO THE ASSESSEE WITH REGARD TO INCLUSION / EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN COMPARABLES. THE LD. AO/TPO ARRIVED AT THE REVISED ADJUSTMENT FIGURE TO ALP AT RS.3,39,81,323/ - . 4. AGGRIEVED, THE ASSESSEE IS IN APPEAL BEFORE US. 5. WE HAVE HEARD RIVAL SUBMISS IONS. WE FIND THAT ASSESSEE HAD CHALLENGED THE FOLLOWING FOUR COMPARABLES OUT OF 5 COMPARABLES CHOSE N BY THE LD. TPO : - I. TSR DARASHAW LTD., II. APTICO LTD., III. GLOBAL PROCUREMENT CONSULTANTS LTD., V. HCCA BUSINESS SERVICES PVT. LTD., LET US NOW EXAMINE EACH AND EVERY COMPARABLE AS UNDER: - 5.1. TSR DARASHAW LTD. THE ASSESSEE SEEKS TO EXCLUD E THIS COMPARABLE. THE LD. TPO FROM THE ANNUAL REPORT OF THIS COMPARABLE COMPANY OBSERVED THAT THE SAID COMPANY IS INVOLVED IN THE PROVISION OF BUSINESS PROCESS OUTSO URCING SERVICES LIKE PAYROLL AND EMPLOYEES TRUST FUND ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT, RECORD MANAGEMENT; REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER AGENTS FOR EQUITY AND PREFERENCE SHARES, DEBENTURE INSTRUMENTS AND BONDS, COMMERCIAL PAPER AND PRIVATE PLACEMENTS, TRANSFER PROCE SSING, CUSTOMER/QUERY HANDLING AND CORRESPONDE NCE, SPLIT/CONSOLIDATION/RENEWAL OF CERTIFICATES, PROCESSING AND DISTRIBUTION OF INTEREST/DIVIDEND WARRANTS; DEPOSITORY RELATED SERVICES LIKE ELECTRONIC CONNECTIVITY WITH NSDL/CDSL AND TRANSMISSION OF INFORMATI ON TO CLIENT COMPANIES THROUGH PREFERABLE ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 13 ELECTRONIC MEDIA, DEMATERIALIZAIION/REMATERIALIZATION, INTER - DEPOSITORY TRANSFERS; REGISTRAR TO FI XED DEPOSIT SCHE MES LIKE ACCEPTANCE AND PROCESSING OF APPLICATIONS, RENEWALS & REPAYMENTS, PROCESS ING & DISTRIBUTION OF INTEREST PAYMENTS THROUGH ECS OR PHYSICAL WARRANTS, ETC ,. 5. 1. 1 . WE FIND THAT THE MAIN CONTENTION OF THE LD. TPO TO INCLUDE THIS COMPARABLE IS THAT ASSESSEE IS ALSO RENDERING SUPPORT SERVICES IN ADDITION TO LOGISTICS SERVICES. IN THIS REGARD , ON PERU SAL OF THE ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SAID COMPARABLE, WE FIND FROM THE SEGMENTAL DATA PROVIDED THEREON, THE SAID COMPARABLE IS ENGAGED IN DERIVING REVENUE FROM THE FOLLOWING THREE MAIN STREAM ACTIVITIES : - ( I ) REGISTRAR AND SHARE TRANSFER AGENT ACTIVITY - RS.1194.83 LAKHS ( II ) REVENUE FROM RECORD MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY RS.144.18 LAKHS ( III ) REVENUE FROM PAYROLL AND TRUST FUND ACTIVITY - RS.672.28 LAKHS ========== TOTAL RS.2007.61 LAKHS ========== 5. 1. 2 . THE LD. AR PLEADED BEFORE US THAT MORE THAN 59.51% OF THE REV ENUE WAS DERIVED BY THE SAID COMPARABLE ONLY FROM THE REGISTRAR AND SHARE TRANSFER AGENT ACTIVITY AND NO BUSINESS SUPPORT SERVICES WERE RENDERED THEREON. HE ALSO PLACED ON RECORD THE ORDER OF THE LD. DRP DATED 12/09/2017 IN ASSESSEES OWN CASE PASSED FOR T HE A.Y.2013 - 14 WHEREIN THE LD. DRP HAD HELD THAT REGISTRAR AND SHARE TRANSFER AGENT ACTIVITIES CANNOT BE CONSTRUED AS BUSINESS SUPPORT SERVICES IN ASSESSEES OWN CASE. HE ALSO DREW OUR ATTENTION ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 14 TO PARA 7.9.4 OF THE SAID ORDER OF LD. DRP DATED 12/09/2017 P ASSED FOR THE A.Y.2013 - 14 WHICH IS ENCLOSED IN PAGE 470 OF THE PAPER BOOK WHEREIN IT HAS BEEN HELD BY THE LD. DRP THAT BACK OFFICE SUPPORT SERVICES SUCH AS HR MANAGEMENT, PAYROLL MANAGEMENT ETC., ARE IN THE NATURE OF ITES SERVICES AND THAT ITES SERVICES CO ULD NOT BE COMPARED WITH LOGISTIC SUPPORT SERVICES. THE LD. AR ALSO PLACED ON RECORD THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LD. DRP IN ASSESSEES OWN CASE ON 15/05/2018 FOR A.Y.2014 - 15 WHEREIN , IN THE CONTEXT OF INCLUSION OF COMPARABLE I.E., TATA CONSULTANCY ENGINEERING LTD., (TCE IN SHORT) BY THE LD. TPO , THE LD. DRP HELD THAT THE SAID COMPARABLE IS FOUND TO BE OPERATING IN THE AREA OF ENGINEERING CONSULTANCY AND NOT IN THE AREA OF SUPPORT SERVICES AND THEREFORE, THE SAME CANNOT BE SELECTED AS AN APPROPRIATE COMPARABLE TO THE ASSESSEE . 5. 1. 3 . THE LD. AR ALSO DREW OUR ATTENTION THE VERY SAME ORDER OF LD. DRP DATED 15/05/2018 WHEREIN , IN THE CONTEXT OF INCLUSION OF ONE OF THE COMPARABLES I.E., HOLTEC CONSULTING PVT. LTD., (HOLTEC IN SHORT) BY THE LD. TPO , T HE LD. DRP HELD THAT THE SAID COMPANY IS FOUND TO BE OPERATI NG IN THE AREA OF ENGINEERING CONSULTING AND NOT IN THE AREA OF SUPPORT SERVICES AND THEREFORE, THE SAME CANNOT BE SELECTED AS AN APPROPRIATE COMPARABLE TO THE ASSESSEE COMPANY. 5. 1. 4 . THE LD. DR RELIED ON THE D RP OBSERVATIONS FOR THE YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION WITH REGARD TO THIS COMPARABLE AND DID NOT ADVANCE ANY FURTHER ARGUMENT. THERE IS NO DISPUTE ABO UT THE FUNCTIONS PERFORMED BY THE ASSESSEE AND THE FUNCTIONS PERFORMED BY ITS AE. WE FIND THAT THE CO - ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 15 ORDINATE BENCH OF DELHI TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF TREND MICRO INDIA PVT. LTD., VS D D IT IN ITA NO.1585/DEL/2015 DATED 20/11/2015 FOR A.Y.2010 - 11 HAD HELD IN THE CONTEXT OF EXCLUSION OF TSR DARASHAW LTD., FROM THE LIST OF COMPARABLES AS UNDER: - TSR DARASHAW LIMITED. 9 .1. THE ASSESSEE OBJECTED TO THE INCLUSION OF THIS COMPANY BY ARGUING THAT THE BUSINESS SEGMENTS OF THIS COMPANY ARE, REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER AGENT ACTIVITY; RECORDS MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY; AND PAYROLL AND TRUST FUND ACTIVITY. NOT CONVINCED WITH THE ASSESSEE'S SUBMISSIONS, THE TPO TREATED IT AS COMPARABLE ON ENTITY LEVEL, AGAINST WHICH THE ASSESSEE IS BEFORE US. 9.2. HAVING HEARD THE RIVAL SUBMISSIONS AND PERUSED THE RELEVANT MATERIAL ON RECORD, WE FIND THAT THIS COMPANY IS A BROKING AND INVESTMENT BANKING HOUS E WITH ITS THREE SEGMENTS, NAMELY, REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER AGENT ACTIVITY (R&T); RECORDS MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY (RECORDS); AND PAYROLL AND TRUST FUND ACTIVITY (PAYROLL). UNDER THE REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER AGENT ACTIVITY, THIS COMPANY UNDERTAKES REGISTRAR AND TRA NSFER AGENT ACTIVITY FUNCTIONS FOR EQUITY AND PREFERENCE SHARES, DEBENTURE INSTRUMENTS AND BONDS, COMMERCIAL PAPER AND PRIVATE PLACEMENTS. IT ALSO UNDERTAKES TRANSFER PROCESSING, CUSTOMER/QUERY HANDLING AND CORRESPONDENCE, SPLIT/CONSOLIDATION/RENEWAL OF CE RTIFICATES, PROCESSING AND DISTRIBUTION OF INTEREST/DIVIDEND WARRANTS, PAYMENTS BY PHYSICAL WARRANTS/THROUGH ECS/DIRECT CREDIT. UNDER RECORDS MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY, THIS COMPANY UNDERTAKES STORAGE, RETENTION & RETRIEVAL OF PHYSICAL AND/OR ELECTRONIC RECORDS. UNDER PAYROLL AND TRUST FUND ACTIVITY, THIS COMPANY HANDLES THE ACTIVITIES NORMALLY HANDLED BY 'PAYROLL AND RETIREMENT FUNDS' SECTION IN ANY ORGANIZATION, INCLUDING INTERFACE WITH REGULATORY AUTHORITIES. WHEN WE COMPARE ALL THE THREE BROADER ACTIVITIES UN DERTAKEN BY THIS COMPANY, NAMELY, R&T, RECORDS AND PAYROLL, WITH THE OVERALL PRE AND POST SALE SERVICES RENDERED BY THE ASSESSEE TO ITS AE, ON A COST PLUS BASIS, WE FIND THAT THERE IS A HUGE FUNCTIONAL DISPARITY BETWEEN THE TWO. THAT APART, THE CONSIDERATI ON OF THIS COMPANY ON AN ENTITY LEVEL BY THE TPO HAS RENDERED THE ENTIRE EXERCISE OF COMPARISON MEANINGLESS. FINDING STRIKING DISSIMILARITIES BETWEEN THIS COMPANY AND THE ASSESSEE, WE ORDER TO EXCLUDE THIS COMPANY FROM THE FINAL SET OF COMPARABLES. 5. 1. 5 . WE ALSO FIND THAT AGAINST THIS DECISION, THE REVENUE HAD PREFERRED AN APPEAL TO HONBLE DELHI HIGH COURT WHICH WAS DISMISSED ON THE GROUND ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 16 THAT NO SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW ARISES THEREON REQUIRING EXAMINATION BY THE COURT VIDE ORDER DATED 26/07/2016 I N ITA NO.447/2016. 5. 1. 6 . WE FIND THAT THIS COMPARABLE OF M/S. TSR DARASHAW LIMITED HAD BEEN SOUGHT TO BE EXCLUDED FROM THE FINAL LIST OF COMPARABLES BY THE CO - ORDINATE BENCH DECISION OF DELHI TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF M/S.GECAS SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD., VS. ITO IN C.O. NO.217/DEL/2015 DATED 18/10/2018 FOR A.Y.2010 - 11 WHEREIN THE FACTS ARE AS UNDER: - 2.DURING THE YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION, THE ASSESSEE COMPANY WAS ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF PROVIDING MARKETING SUPPORT SERVICES TO ITS GROUP AFFILIATES AND PARTI CULARLY GECAS SERVICES LIMITED, IRELAND. THE ASSESSEE HAD UNDERTAKEN FOLLOWING INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS WITH ITS ASSOCIATED ENTERPRISES (AE) S.NO. INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS VALUE IN TRANSACTIONS 1 MARKET SUPPORT AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES RENDERED RS .4,57,43,014/ - THE DECISION RENDERED BY THE DELHI TRIBUNAL THEREON IS AS UNDER: - III. TSR DARASHAW LIMITED 13. THE ASSESSEE OBJECTED TO THE INCLUSION OF THIS COMPANY BY ARGUING THAT THE BUSINESS SEGMENTS OF THIS COMPANY ARE, REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER AGENT ACTIVITY; RECORDS MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY; AND PAYROLL AND TRUST FUND ACTIVITY. NOT CONVINCED WITH THE ASSESSEE'S SUBMISSIONS, THE TPO TREATED IT AS COMPARABLE ON ENTITY LEVEL, AGAINST WHICH THE ASSESSEE IS BEFORE US. 14. HAVING HEARD THE RIVAL SUBMISS IONS AND PERUSED THE RELEVANT MATERIAL ON RECORD, WE FIND T H AT THIS COMPANY IS A BROKING AND INVESTMENT BANKING HOUSE WITH ITS THREE SEGMENTS, NAMELY, REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER AGENT ACTIVITY (R&T); RECORDS MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY (RECORDS); AND PAYROLL AND TRUST FUND ACTIVITY (PAYROLL). UNDER THE REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER AGENT ACTIVITY, THIS COMPANY UNDERTAKES REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER AGENT ACTIVITY FUNCTIONS FOR EQUITY AND PREFERENCE SHARES, DEBENTURE INSTRUMENTS AND BONDS, COMMERCIAL PAPER AND PRIVATE PLACEMENTS. I T ALSO UNDERTAKES TRANSFER PROCESSING, CUSTOMER/QUERY HANDLING AND CORRESPONDENCE, SPLIT/CONSOLIDATION/RENEWAL OF CERTIFICATES, PROCESSING AND DISTRIBUTION OF ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 17 INTEREST/DIVIDEND WARRANTS, PAYMENTS BY PHYSICAL WARRANTS/THROUGH ECS/DIRECT CREDIT. UNDER RECORD S MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY, THIS COMPANY UNDERTAKES STORAGE, RETENTION & RETRIEVAL OF PHYSICAL AND/OR ELECTRONIC RECORDS. UNDER PAYROLL AND TRUST FUND ACTIVITY, THIS COMPANY HANDLES THE ACTIVITIES NORMALLY HANDLED BY 'PAYROLL AND RETIREMENT FUNDS' SECTION IN AN Y ORGANIZATION, INCLUDING INTERFACE WITH REGULATORY AUTHORITIES. WHEN WE COMPARE ALL THE THREE BROADER ACTIVITIES UNDERTAKEN BY THIS COMPANY, NAMELY, S.&T, RECORDS AND PAYROLL, WITH THE MARKET SERVICES RENDERED BY THE ASSESSEE TO ITS AE, ON A COST PLUS BAS IS, WE FIND THAT THERE IS A HUGE FUNCTIONAL DISPARITY BETWEEN THE TWO. THAT APART, THE CONSIDERATION OF THIS COMPANY ON AN ENTITY LEVEL BY THE TPO HAS RENDERED THE ENTIRE EXERCISE OF COMPARISON MEANINGLESS. FINDING STRIKING DISSIMILARITIES BETWEEN THIS CO MPANY AND THE ASSESSEE, WE ORDER TO EXCLUDE THIS COMPANY FROM THE FINAL SET OF COMPARABLES. SIMILAR VIEW HAS BEEN TAKEN BY THE TRIBUNAL IN ITS ORDER FOR THE IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING YEAR IN ASSESSEE'S OWN CASE. 5.1. 7 . WE HOLD THAT IN THE LIGHT OF FUNCTIONS PERFORMED BY THE ASSESSEE AND THE FUNCTIONS PERFORMED BY THE AE WHICH REMAIN UNDISPUTED BEFORE US AND IN THE LIGHT OF THE FUNCTIONS PERFORMED BY TSR DARASHAW LIMITED (I.E., COMPARABLE CHOSEN BY THE LD. TPO) AND FURTHER IN THE LIGHT OF THE AFORESAID JUDICIA L PRECEDENTS, WE HOLD THAT THE COMPARABLE TSR DARASHAW LIMITED CANNOT BE TREATED AS A GOOD COMPARABLE WITH THE ASSESSEE IN VIEW OF THE FUNCTIONAL DISSIMILARITIES. THE LD. TPO ACCORDINGLY IS DIRECTED TO EXCLUDE THE SAME FROM THE LIST OF FINAL COMPARABLES. 5.2. APITCO LIMITED THE ASSESSEE SOUGHT FOR EXCLUSION OF THIS COMPARABLE FROM THE LIST OF FINAL COMPARABLES CHOSEN BY THE LD. TPO. THE LD. TPO OBSERVED THAT AS PER THE INFORMATION DOWNLOADED FROM THE WEBSITE OF THE SAID COMPARABLE, THE SAID COMPANY I S IN VOLVED IN THE PROVISION OF CONSULTING SERVICES, ESPECIALLY ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 18 TO SMES IN PROJECT IDENTIFICATION, PROJECT COUNSELLING, PRE - FEASIBILITY REPORTS, DETAILED PROJECT FEASIBILITY STUDIED, INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING, MARKET ASSESSMENT, EXPANSION, DIVERSIFICATION AND TUR NAROUND STRATEGIES ENERGY AUDITS, WASTE MINIMI Z ATION, ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT, VALUATION OF FIXED ASSETS, SKI LL DEVELOPMENT ETC, WHICH IS AKIN TO SERVICES PROVIDED BY ASSESSEE. 5. 2.1 . WE FIND THAT THE LD. TPO ON PERUSAL OF BREAK - UP OF REVENUE EARNED BY THE SAID COMPARABLE OBSERVED THAT THE MAJORITY OF THE REVENUE IS FROM CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT OF RS.494.86 LAKHS AND P ROJECT RELATED SERVICES OF RS.365.66 LAKHS, WHICH ARE IN THE NATURE OF BUSINESS SUPPORT SERVICES. ACCORDINGLY, THE LD. TPO CONCLUDED THAT T HESE SERVICES ARE PROVIDED BY THE ASSESSEE ALSO AND HENCE IS A GOOD COMPARABLE. WE FIND THAT THE PRIMARY ARGUMENT OF THE LD. AR BEFORE US WAS THAT THIS COMPANY IS A GOVERNMENT COMPANY AND HENCE, CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AS A COMPARABLE. 5.2.2. PER CONTRA, THE LD. DR PLACED RELIANCE ON THE DECISION OF THE CO - ORDINATE BENCH OF DELHI TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF BG EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INDIA LTD., IN ITA NO.1170/DEL/2015 DATED 24/04/2017 WHEREIN IT WAS HELD THAT GOVERNMENT COMPANY IS ALSO A GOOD COMPARABLE. 5.2.3. WE FIND THAT THE LD. AR PLACED ON RECORD THE MASTER DATA DOWNLOADED FROM THE MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS WEBSITE WITH REGARD TO THIS COMPARABLE WHEREIN IT HAS BEEN CATEGORICALLY STATED THAT THIS COMPANY IS A STATE GOVERNMENT COMPANY. NOW THE SHORT QUESTI ON THAT ARISES FOR OUR CONSIDERATION IS WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT COMPANY COULD BE ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 19 CONSIDERED AS A COMPARABLE WITH THAT OF THE ASSESSEE , WHICH IS A PRIVATE CONCERN . WE FIND THAT THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN ADDRESSED BY THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CAS E OF CIT VS. THYSSENKRUPP INDUSTRIES INDIA (P) LTD., REPORTED IN 68 TAXMANN.COM 248 (BOMBAY) WHEREIN M/S. ENGINEERS INDIA LTD., WHICH IS ALSO A GOVERNMENT COMPANY WAS SOUGHT TO BE EXCLUDED FROM THE LIST OF COMPARABLES BY OBSERVING AS UNDER: - 4. RE QUESTI ON (B) :- (A) THE GRIEVANCE OF THE RESPONDENT ASSESSEE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL WAS THAT M/S. ENGINEERS INDIA LTD. HAS BEEN ERRONEOUSLY INTRODUCED AS A COMPARABLE BY THE TPO FOR DETERMINING THE ALP OF THE RESPONDENT ASSESSEE'S INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS. THE IM PUGNED ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL RECORDS THE FACT THAT THE ENGINEERING INDIA LTD. IS A GOVERNMENT COMPANY AND ITS ANNUAL REPORT INDICATES THAT A SUBSTANTIAL PART OF ITS REVENUE IN EXECUTION OF TURNKEY PROJECTS AROSE OUT OF EXECUTING PROJECTS OF PUBLIC SECTOR U NDERTAKINGS. IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL HOLDS THAT THE ENGINEERS INDIA LTD. COULD NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE COMPARABLE FOR THE REASON THAT CONTRACTS BETWEEN PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS ARE NOT DRIVEN BY PROFIT MOTIVE ALONE BUT OT HER CONSIDERATION ALSO WEIGH IN SUCH AS DISCHARGE OF SOCIAL OBLIGATIONS ETC. THUS, IT IS NOT COMPARABLE. MOREOVER, FROM THE ANNUAL REPORT, IT IS CLEAR THAT THE REVENUE EARNED IN EXECUTING TURNKEY PROJECT FOR OTHER PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS WAS MUCH MORE T HAN THE FILTER OF 25%, WHICH HAS BEEN APPLIED BY THE TPO IN HIS ORDER UNDER SECTION 92CA(3) OF THE ACT, WHILE TAKING TRF LTD. AS A COMPARABLE ON THE GROUND THAT ITS RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION WAS NOT IN EXCESS OF 25% OF ITS TOTAL TURNOVER. THUS, APPLYING CO NSISTENT FILTER OF 25% OR LESS OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION ALONE TO BE CONSIDERED COMPARABLE, ENGINEERS INDIA LTD. COULD NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE COMPARABLE. (B) WE FIND THAT THE VIEW TAKEN BY THE TRIBUNAL IN THE IMPUGNED ORDER IS A REASONABLE AND POSSIB LE VIEW. NOTHING HAS BEEN SHOWN WHICH WOULD JUSTIFY OUR INTERFERENCE IN THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL EXCLUDING ENGINEERS INDIA LTD. FROM THE LIST OF COMPARABLES. (C) IN THE ABOVE VIEW, QUESTION ( B ) AS FRAMED ALSO DOES NOT GIVE RISE TO ANY SUBSTANTIA L QUESTION OF LAW. THUS, NOT ENTERTAINED . ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 20 5.2.4. WE ALSO FIND THAT THE HONBLE DELHI HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF PCIT VS. INTERNATIONAL SOS SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD., IN ITA NO.454 OF 2016 DATED 30/05/2017 IN THE CONTEXT OF EXCLUSION OF COMPARABLES APITCO L IMITED AND GLOBAL PROCUREMENT CONSULTANT LTD., AMONG OTHERS HAD PLACED RELIANCE ON THE AFORESAID DECISION OF HONBLE BOMBAY HIGH COURT AND HAD HELD THAT GOVERNMENT OWNED COMPANIES CANNOT BE CONSTRUED AS A COMPARABLE. 5.2.5. RESPECTFULLY FOLLOWING THE AFOR ESAID DECISION OF HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT AND HONBLE DELHI HIGH COURT SUPRA, WE HOLD THAT COMPARABLE APITCO LIMITED SHOULD BE EXCLUDED FROM THE LIST OF COMPARABLES. 5.3. GLOBAL PROCUREMENT CONSULTANT LTD., THE LD. DR PLACED RELIANCE ON THE DECI SION OF CO - ORDINATE BENCH OF DELHI TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR INDIA PVT. LTD., VS. DCIT IN ITA NO.1263/DEL/2015 DATED 18/12/2017 FOR A.Y.2010 - 11 WHEREIN GLOBAL PROCUREMENT CONSULTANT LTD., WAS STATED TO BE A GOOD COMPARABLE IN THE SET OF FACTS AVAILABLE BEFORE THE DELHI TRIBUNAL. THE LD. DR ALSO ARGUED THAT THIS IS NOT A GOVERNMENT COMPANY AS ARGUED BY THE LD AR, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT SHARES OF THIS COMPANY WERE PARTIALLY HELD BY E XIM BANK . WE FIND THAT THE CO - ORDINATE BENCH OF THE DELHI TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF PHILIP M O RRIS SERVICES INDIA S.A. VS. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX IN 95 TAXMANN.COM 156 HAD SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDED GLOBAL PROCUREMENT CONSULTANT LTD., FROM THE LIST OF COMPARABLES AS IT IS A GOVERNMENT ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 21 COMPANY. THEY HAD ALSO GIVEN A CATEGORICAL FINDING THAT THE SAID COMPARABLE COMPANY IS A COMPANY ESTABLISHED BY THE GOVERNMENT TO SERVE THE PURPOSE OF PROVISIONAL PROCUREMENT AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES NEEDS AND ALSO TO PROVIDE COMBINED MANAGEMENT SERVICES REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNMEN T DEPARTMENT S OR THEIR PROJECT EXECUTION AGENCIES TO CARRY OUT THE PROCUREMENT IN A TIME BOUND AND EFFICIENT MANNER WITHIN THE FRAME WORK OF GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES OF INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS. HENCE, THE DECISION RENDERED BY US FOR APTICO LIMITED WOULD APPLY WITH EQUAL FORCE FOR GLOBAL PROCUREMENT CONSULTANT LTD., ALSO ON THE VERY SAME FOOTING I.E., THE SAID COMPARABLE BEING A GOVERNMENT COMPANY . H ENCE WE DIRECT THE LD. TPO TO EXCLUDE THE SAME FROM THE LIST OF COMPARABLES. 5.4. HCCA BUSINE SS SERVICES PVT. LTD., WITH REGARD TO EXCLUSION SOUGHT BY THE ASSESSEE IN RESPECT OF COMPARABLE HCCA BUSINESS SERVICES PVT. LTD., WE FIND THAT THE LD. DRP IN ITS ORDER FOR A.Y.2013 - 14 IN ASSESSEES OWN CASE HAD EXCLUDED THIS FROM THE LIST OF COMPARABLES. T HE LD. DR RELIED ON THE OBSERVATIONS OF THE LD. DRP WITH REGARD TO THIS COMPARABLE. HENCE, FOLLOWING THE DIRECTIONS OF DRP IN ASSESSEES OWN CASE IN THE A.Y.2013 - 14, WE DIRECT THE LD. AO TO REMOVE THIS COMPARABLE FROM THE LIST OF COMPARABLES. 5.5. THE LD. TPO IS DIRECTED TO RE - COMPUTE THE ALP OF THE ASSESSEE AFTER EXCLUDING THE AFORESAID FOUR COMPARABLES AND ARRIVE AT THE REVISED MARGIN OF THE COMPARABLES AND DECIDE AS TO WHETHER ALP ADJUSTMENT, IF ANY, ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 22 NEED TO BE MADE THEREAFTER, IN THE CASE OF THE ASSESSE E. ACCORDINGLY, GROUND NO.6, 20,21,22 & 23 ARE ALLOWED. 6. GROUND NO.7 TO 9 RAISED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE ONLY WITH REGARD TO THE ADOPTION OF CORRECT MARGINS OF THE AFORESAID COMPARABLES WHICH WE DIRECT THE LD. TPO TO VERIFY WHILE RECOMPUTING REVISED ALP IN THE LIGHT OF THE AFORESAID DIRECTIONS GIVEN BY US. 7. GROUND NO.10 RAISED BY THE ASSESSEE IS ONLY ACADEMIC AND DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY SPECIFIC ADJUDICATION. 8. GROUND NO. 11 & 12 WERE STATED TO BE NOT PRESSED BY THE LD. AR BEFORE US . THE SAME IS RECKONED AS A STATEMENT MADE FROM THE BAR. ACCORDINGLY, THE SAME ARE DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED. 9. GROUND NO.13 RAISED BY THE ASSESSEE IS WITH REGARD TO SHORT CREDIT OF TAX DEDUCTED AT SOURCE, WHICH IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO BE VERIFIED BY THE LD. AO AND GRANT THE SAME AS PER LAW IF ASSESSEE IS FOUND TO BE ELIGIBLE THEREON. 10. GROUND NO.1 4 IS WITH REGARD TO CHARGEABILITY OF INTEREST U/S.234A OF THE ACT. THE LD. AR STATED THAT DUE DATE OF FILING RETURN OF INCOME FOR THE A.Y.2010 - 11 WAS EXTENDED BY CBDT TO 15 TH OCTOBER 2010 FOR WHICH HE PLACED ON RECORD THE ORDER PASSED BY THE CBDT ON 27/09/2010. THE RETURN OF INCOME WAS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ON 15/10/2010 I.E., ON THE DUE DATE. HENCE, NO INTEREST U/S.234A OF THE ACT COULD BE LEVIED ON THE ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 23 ASSESSEE. ACCORDINGLY, THE GROUND N O.14 RAISED BY THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED. 11. GROUND NOS. 15 & 16 RAISED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE WITH REGARD TO CHARGEABILITY OF INTEREST U/S.234B OF THE ACT WHICH ARE CONSEQUENTIAL IN NATURE AND DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY SPECIFIC ADJUDICATION. 12. GROUND NO.17 & 18 RAISED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE WITH REGARD TO CHARGEABILITY OF INTEREST U/S.234 D OF THE ACT WHICH ARE CONSEQUENTIAL IN NATURE . THE LD. AO IS ALSO DIRECTED TO VERIFY WHETHER AT ALL ANY REFUND WAS ACTUALLY GRANTED TO THE ASSESSEE BEFORE DECIDING THE CHARGEABILI TY OF INTEREST U/S.234D OF THE ACT. 13. GROUND NO.19 RAISED BY THE ASSESSEE IS WITH REGARD TO INITIATION OF PENALTY PROCEEDINGS U/S.271(1)(C) OF THE ACT, THE ADJUDICATION OF WHICH WOULD BE PREMATURE AT THIS STAGE. 14. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS PARTLY ALLOWED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS 29 / 05 /201 9 SD/ - ( C.N. PRASAD ) SD/ - ( M.BALAGANESH ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI; DATED 29 / 05 /201 9 KARUNA SR . PS COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : BY ORDER, 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT(A), MUMBAI. 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. GUARD FILE. //TRUE COPY// ITA NO.2162/MUM/2 01 5 M/S. APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 24 ( ASSTT. REGISTRAR) ITAT, MUMBAI
Other Referred Cases
-
Laws Referred To
-
1:1 Consultation with family dentist -Your Smile Deserves the Best Care!
₹250
Consultation on Entity Formation
₹0
Tax Holiday Secrets for Startups
₹0
Startup Dissolution Resolution
₹0
No Objection Letter for Use of Property – Partnership Firm
₹0
Finance Bill, 2026: Key GST Reforms that will Reshape Compliance and Cash Flows
Team Counselvise - February 03, 2026
Why Meesho got ₹1,500 Crore Tax Demand ?
Team Counselvise - March 09, 2026
SEBI Resets Mutual Fund Rules: A Structural Shift for Investors
Team Counselvise - March 13, 2026