, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B (SMC) BENCH : CHENNAI . , [BEFORE SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT M EMBER ] ./I.T.A. NO.2163/MDS/2017 / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2014-2015 SMT. INDRA DEVI CHHALLANI, OLD NO.15, NEW NO.1, ARUNACHALAM STREET, SOWCARPET, CHENNAI 600 079. [PAN AADPC 7420R] VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NON CORPORATE WARD 4(2) CHENNAI 600 006. ( !' / APPELLANT) ( #$!' /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : NONE /RESPONDENT BY : SHRI. B. SAGADEVAN, IRS,JCIT. /DATE OF HEARING : 02-01-2018 !' /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 04-01-2018 % / O R D E R WHEN THE APPEAL WAS CALLED UP FOR HEARING, NOBODY REPRESENTING THE ASSESSEE APPEARED NOR HAS ANY ADJ OURNMENT REQUEST BEEN RECEIVED. HENCE, IT IS INFERRED THAT THE ASSE SSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF CIT V. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. (38 ITD 320) ITA NO.2163 /MDS/2017 :- 2 -: (DEL), I DISMISS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE, FOR NO N-PROSECUTION. 2. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMI SSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF J ANUARY, 2018, AT CHENNAI. SD/- ( . ) (ABRAHAM P. GEORGE) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER #$ / CHENNAI %& / DATED: 4TH JANUARY, 2018 KV &' ()*) / COPY TO: 1 . / APPELLANT 3. +,- / CIT(A) 5. )./ 0 / DR 2. / RESPONDENT 4. + / CIT 6. /12 / GF