PATAN SOLAR PVT. LTD., MUMBAI V. DCIT - 10(3)(2), MUMBAI

ITA 2164/MUM/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 111 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5413 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 10 month(s) 12 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 19-02-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Partly Allowed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 06-04-2018
• Result in Favour of: Partly Allowed
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: KUMAR PADMA
• Assessee Lawyers: K GOPAL SHRI TANMAY PHADKE
• Keywords: Depreciation
• Section: 22

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C , BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI M.BALAGANESH , A M & SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JM ITA NO. 2164 /MUM/201 9 ( ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2013 - 14 ) M/S. PATAN SOLAR PVT. LTD., 602, WESTERN EDGE - I, WESTERN EXPRESS HIGHWAY BORIVALI (E), MU MBAI 400 066 VS. DCIT - 10(3)(2) ROOM NO.509, 5 TH FLOOR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN M.K. ROAD, MUMBAI - 400020 PAN/GIR NO. AAFCP6744A (APPELLANT ) .. (RESPONDENT ) ASSESSEE BY SHRI K GOPAL / SHRI TANMAY PHADKE REVENUE BY SHRI KUMAR PADMAPANI BORA DATE OF HEARI NG 30 / 01 /2020 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 19 / 02 /2020 / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M) : THIS APPEAL IN ITA NO. 2164/MUM/2018 FOR A.Y. 2013 - 14 ARISES OUT OF THE ORDER BY THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) - 51, MUMBAI IN APPEAL NO. CIT(A) - 17/IT - 19/E - FILE/17 - 18 DATED 12/02/2018 (LD. CIT(A) IN SHORT) AGAINST THE ORDER OF ASSESSMENT PASSED U/S.143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS ACT) DATED 10/03/2016 BY THE LD. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 10(3)(2), MUMBAI (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS LD. AO). 2. THE FIRST ISSUE TO BE DECIDED IN THIS APPEAL IS AS TO WHETHER THE INTEREST INCOME OF RS.2,30,04,499/ - RECEIVED BY THE ASSESSEE ON LOANS ITA NO .2164/MUM/2018 M/S. PATAN SOLAR P. LTD. 2 GRANTED BY IT SHOULD BE ASSESSED AS INCOME UNDER THE HEAD INCOME FROM OTHER SOURCES OR INCOME UNDER THE HEAD PROFITS AND GAINS OF BUSINESS OR PROFESSION. THE INTERCONNECTED ISSUE INVOLVED THEREIN IS THAT WHETHER THE ASSESSEE IS ENTITLED FOR DEDUCTION OF INTEREST EXPENDITURE OF RS.2,26,07,021/ - AGAINST THE SAID INTEREST INCOME I RRESPECTIVE OF THE HEAD OF INCOME IN WHICH IT IS TAXED. 3. WE HAVE HEARD THE RIVAL SUBMISSIONS AND PERUSED THE MATERIALS AVAILABLE ON RECORD. WE FIND THAT THE ASSESSEE COMPANY WAS INCORPORATED WITH THE OBJECTIVE OF BUSINESS RELATED TO RENEWABLE ENERGY SOU RCES. THE RETURN OF INCOME WAS FILED ON 15/09/2013 FOR THE A.Y.2013 - 14 DECLARING LOSS OF RS.40,45,449/ - . IN THE COURSE OF SCRUTINY ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS, THE LD. AO NOTED THAT THOUGH THE COMPANYS MAIN BUSINESS WAS DEALING IN RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE, FOR SETTING UP OF SOLAR PLANT, HOWEVER, SUITABLE LAND COULD NOT BE ACQUIRED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE SAME. HENCE, THE LD. AO CONCLUDED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAD NOT COMMENCED ITS BUSINESS ACTIVITY FOR WHICH IT WAS INCORPORATED. THE ASSESSEE COMPANY HAD ALREADY RAIS ED CERTAIN FUNDS BY WAY OF BORROWINGS. THOSE BORROWINGS WERE UTILISED FOR ADVANCING TO CERTAIN PARTIES ON WHICH INTEREST INCOME WAS EARNED BY THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSESSEE ALSO PAID INTEREST ON THE BORROWINGS MADE BY IT. THE ASSESSEE OFFERED THE INTEREST INCO ME ON LOANS GIVEN BY IT AS INCOME FROM OTHER BUSINESS AND SET OFF THE INTEREST EXPENDITURE ON BORROWINGS WITH THE SAME. THE LD. AO BY PLACING RELIANCE ON THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF TUTICORIN ALKALI LTD. VS. CIT REPORTED IN 22 7 ITR 172, TREATED THE INTEREST INCOME UNDER THE HEAD INCOME FROM OTHER SOURCES AND CORRESPONDINGLY DECLINED TO GIVE DEDUCTION AND THE INTEREST EXPENDITURE PAID ON BORROWINGS. THIS ACTION OF THE LD. AO WAS UPHELD BY THE LD. CIT(A). ITA NO .2164/MUM/2018 M/S. PATAN SOLAR P. LTD. 3 3.1. FROM THE PERUSAL OF THE BALANCE SHEET OF THE ASSESSEE AS ON 31/03/2013, WE FIND THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS SHORT TERM BORROWINGS OF RS.28,36,42,157/ - . THE ASSESSEE ALSO HAD ADVANCED LOANS AND INTERCORPORATE DEPOSITS TO CERTAIN PARTIES AND ALSO HAD PLACED DEPOSITS WITH CERTAIN P ARTIES TO THE TUNE OF RS.25,34,16,575/ - . HENCE, NEXUS O F BORROWED FUNDS BEING USED FOR MAKING SHORT TERM LOANS AND INTERCORPORATE DEPOSIT S IS PROVED FROM THE BARE PERUSAL OF THE BALANCE SHEET. IT IS NOT IN DISPUTE THAT THE BORROWED FUNDS ON WHICH INTEREST WAS PAID BY THE ASSESSEE HAD BEEN UTILISED FOR DEPOSITS MADE TO CERTAIN PARTIES AND WITH THE BANKS ON WHICH INTEREST INCOME WAS EARNED BY THE ASSESSEE. HENCE, ONE TO ONE NEXUS OF INTEREST BEARING FUNDS BEING UTILISED FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING INVESTMENT IN DEPOSITS WITH BANKS IS PROVED BY THE ASSESSEE IN THE INSTANT CASE. AT THE SAME TIME , WE FIND THAT THE ASSESSEE HAD NOT COMMENCED ITS BUSINESS OF SET TING UP OF SOLAR PLANT. HENCE, THE INTEREST INCOME, IF ANY , DERIVED ON DEPOSITS SHOULD BE BROUGHT TO TAX ON LY UNDER THE HEAD INCOME FROM OTHER SOURCES . SINCE, THE NEXUS OF BORROWED FUNDS BEING UTILISED FOR MAKING INVESTMENT I N DEPOSITS HAD BEEN PROVED BY THE ASSESSEE BEYOND DOUBT, THE ASSESSEE IS INDEED ENTITLED FOR DEDUCT ION OF INTEREST PAYMENT U/S.57(III ) O F THE ACT AGAINST THE INTEREST INCOME. THE LD. AO IS DIRECTED ACCORDINGLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE GROUND NOS. 1 - 3 RAISED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DISPOSED OFF IN THE AFORESAID MANNER. 4. THE GROUND NO.4 RAISED BY THE ASSESSEE IS WITH CHALLENGING THE ACTION OF THE LD . CIT(A) IN CONFIRMING THE DISALLOWANCE OF SALARY AND WAGES OF RS.10,23,417/ - AND DEPRECIATION O N FACTORY PREMISES AND MOTOR CAR OF RS.10,36,015/ - . 4.1. WE HAVE HEARD RIVAL SUBMISSIONS. WE HAVE ALREADY HELD THAT ASSESSEE HAD NOT COMMENCED ITS BUSINESS ACT IVITY OF SETTING UP OF SOLAR ITA NO .2164/MUM/2018 M/S. PATAN SOLAR P. LTD. 4 PLANT AND HENCE, IT IS NOT ENTITLED FOR DEDUCTION OF EXPENSES TOWARDS SALARY AND WAGES OF RS.10,23,417/ - UNDER THE HEAD BUSINESS. THE SAME WOULD NOT BE ALLOWABLE AS DEDUCTION UNDER THE HEAD INCOME FROM OTHER SOURCES AS INCURR ENCE OF ITS EXPENDITURE COULD NOT BE TERMED AS EXPENDITURE INCURRED FOR THE PURPOSE OF EARNING INTEREST INCOME BY THE ASSESSEE WHICH IS TAXED UNDER THE HEAD INCOME FROM OTHER SOURCES. HENCE, WE HOLD THAT THE LD. CIT(A) HAD RIGHTLY DISALLOWED THE SALARIES A ND WAGES. 4.2. WITH REGARD TO DISALLOWANCE AND DEPRECIATION IS CONCERNED IN THE SUM OF RS.10,36,015/ - , WE FIND THAT THE DEPRECIATION IN ANY CASE IS ALLOWABLE AS DEDUCTION U/S.57(II) OF THE ACT. WE HAVE ALREADY HELD THAT THE INTEREST INCOME IS TAXED UNDER THE HEAD INCOME FROM OTHER SOURCES U/S.56 OF THE ACT, THE ASSESSEE IS ENTITLED FOR DEPRECIATION U/S.57(II) OF THE ACT. THE LD. AO IS DIRECTED ACCORDINGLY. 5. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS PARTLY ALLOWED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS 19 / 02 /2020 SD/ - ( RAVISH SOOD ) SD/ - (M.BALAGANESH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI ; DATED 19 / 02 / 2020 KARUNA , SR.PS ITA NO .2164/MUM/2018 M/S. PATAN SOLAR P. LTD. 5 COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : BY ORDER, ( ASSTT. REGISTRAR) ITAT, MUMBAI 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT(A), MUMBAI. 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. GUARD FILE. //TRUE COPY//