The Kabbur Cr. Souhard Sahakari Ltd., Belgaum V. Income Tax Officer Ward-1, Belgaum

ITA 217/PAN/2013

• Counselvise Citation: [2014] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 75984 (ITAT-PANAJI)
• Duration Of Justice: 7 month(s) 26 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 21-03-2014
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Next Hearing Date: 19-03-2014
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 26-07-2013
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SONAL L SONKAVDE LD
• Assessee Lawyers: S D KALBURGI
• Keywords: Opportunity of being heard

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI BEFORE SHRI P.K. BANSAL, HONBLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI D.T. GARASIA, HONBLE JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO . 217 /PNJ/2013 : (ASST. YEAR : 2010 - 11) THE KABBUR CREDIT SOUHARD SAHAKRI LTD, C/O SUNIL D KALBURGI, ADVOCATE, S2 SHRI SIDDHI APT, GONDHALI GALLI, BELGAUM - 590002. PAN : AABAT0857G (APPELLANT) VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1 , NIPANI , DIST. BELGAUM . (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : SHRI PRAMOD VAIDYA, ADV. & SHRI S.D. KALBURGI, C.A. REVENUE BY : SMT. SONAL L. SONKAVDE, LD. DR DATE OF HEARING : 1 9 /03/2014 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 21 /03/2014 O R D E R PER P.K. BANSAL THIS APPEAL HA S BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIT(A), BELGAUM DT D . 26 . 3 .2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010 - 11 BY TAKING THE FOLLOWING EFFECTIVE GROUNDS OF APPEAL : - 1. ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES AND IN LAW T HE LEARNED CIT(A PPEALS ) ERRED IN CONFIRMING THE ADDITION OF RS. 11,69,310/ - ON ACCOUNT OF DISALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P[2][A][I] OF INCOME TAX ACT. 2. THE LEARNED CIT(A PPEALS ) ERRED IN HOLDING THAT THE ASSESSEE IS ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF BANKING AND THEREFORE IS A PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE BANK WITH THE MEANING OF SECTION 5[CCI] OF THE BANKING REGULATION ACT 1949 . 2 ITA NO.217/PNJ/2013 (ASST. YEAR: 2010 - 11) 3. THE AUTHORITIES FAILED TO APPRECIATE THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT GOVERNED BY RBI ACT OR THE BANKING REGULATION ACT 1949, WHERE AS IT IS GOVERNED BY THE KARNATAKA SOUHARD SAHAKARI ACT 1997 AND CORRESPONDING BYE LAWS. 4. THE LEARNED CIT(A PPEALS ) ERRED IN HOLDING THAT THE ASSESSEE ALSO ACCEPTS THE DEPOSITS FROM GENERAL PUBLIC WHEN THE FACTS REVEAL THAT DEPOSITS ARE ACCEPTED ONLY FROM MEMBERS FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEETING FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS OF MEMBERS AND TO PROVIDE CREDIT FACILITIES TO THE MEMBERS AS PER THE BYE LAWS. 5. THE LEARNED CIT(A PPEALS ) ERRED IN NOT GRANTING DEDUCTION U/S 80P [2][A][I] OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, WHICH IS SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED TO A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY CARRYING ON THE BUSINESS PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS . 6. THE LEARNED CIT(A PPEALS) OUT TO HAVE APPRECIATED THAT THE INSERTION OF CLAUSE [VIIA] IN SECTION 2[24] OF THE ACT DOES NOT ALTER THE POSITION AS FAR AS DEDUCTION U/S 80P[2][A][I] OF THE ACT TO CO - OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY WHIC H IS ENGAGED IN PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS. 7. THE LEARNED CIT[APPEALS] ERRED IN DENYING THE DEDUCTION U/S 80P[2][A][I] OF THE ACT TO A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY BY APPLYING THE AMENDMENT BY INSERTION OF SECTION 80P [4] WHICH IS APPLICABLE TO CO - OPERATIVE BANKS. 8. WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE CLAIM OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P[2][A][I], THE INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY IS ALSO EXEMPT ON THE GROUND OF MUTUALITY. 9. THE REASONS ASSIGNED FOR MAKING THE DISALLOWANCE ARE WRONG, INSUFFICIENT AND CONTRARY TO LAW AND FACTS OF THE CASE. 2. THE ISSUE INVOLVED IN TH IS APPEAL IS ON THE BASIS OF THE FACTS FOR THE A.Y.20 10 - 1 1 . THE BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE FOR THE A.Y.20 10 - 1 1 IS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS A SOUHARDA SAHAKARI REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1997 . THE ASSESSEE FILED RETURN DECLARING GROSS TOTAL INCOME OF RS. 1 1,4 4 , 314 / - AND CLAIMED DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) AND THEREFORE NET TAXABLE INCOME WAS SHOWN TO BE NIL. THE AO DID NOT ALLOW THE DEDUCTION TO THE A SSESSEE U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) AND THE INCOME WAS ASSESSED AT RS. 1 1 , 69 , 310 / - . THE AO WHILE DENYING THE DEDUCTION TO THE ASSESSEE U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) TOOK THE VIEW THAT THE ASSESSEE IS A PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE BANK AND 3 ITA NO.217/PNJ/2013 (ASST. YEAR: 2010 - 11) THEREFORE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 80P(4) ARE APPLICA BLE IN THE CASE OF THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSESSEE WENT IN APPEAL BEFORE THE CIT(A). CIT(A) DISMISSED THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE. 2.1 THE LD. AR BEFORE US VEHEMENTLY CONTENDED THAT THE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 80P(4) ARE NOT APPLICABLE IN THE CASE OF THE ASSESSEE . THE ASSESSEE IS NOT A CO - OPERATIVE BANK. THE ASSESSEE IS A SOUHARDA SAHAKARI REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1997. THE PRIMARY OBJECT OF THE ASSESSEE IS TO IMPROVE THE FINANCIAL CAPACITY, SAVINGS OF THE MEM BERS OF THE SOCIETY AND TO ENCOURAGE FOR MUTUAL HELP AND TO PROMOTE ECONOMY, SELF - HELP AND CO - OPERATIVE FEELINGS AMONG SAHAKARI MEMBERS AND DEPOSITORS. FOR THIS, OUR ATTENTION WAS DRAWN TOWARDS THE BYE - LAWS OF THE ASSESSEE FROM (1) TO (15). THE ASSESSEE I S A CREDIT SOCIETY. THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE ARE LIMITED TO ITS MEMBERS. THE ASSESSEE DID NOT DISPUTE THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE ACCEPTS THE DEPOSIT OTHER THAN MEMBERS. THE PAID UP CAPITAL OF THE ASSESSEE, NO DOUBT, IS MORE THAN RS. 1 LACS. IT WAS CONTENDED THAT THE ISSUE IS DULY COVERED IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE BY THE DECISION OF THE HON'BLE GUJARAT HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. JAFARI MOMIN VIKAS CO - OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. IN TAX APPEAL NOS. 442 OF 2013, 443 OF 2013 AND 863 OF 2013. ATTENTI ON WAS ALSO DRAWN TOWARDS THE DECISION OF THE HON'BLE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF VYAVASAYA SEVA SAHAKARA SANGHA VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. FOR THE PROPOSITION OF LAW BY REFERRING TO PARA 12 THAT MERELY BECAUSE THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY IS REQUIR ED TO ADVANCE LOAN TO ITS MEMBERS, IT DOES NOT CEASE TO BE A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY GOVERNED BY THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT NOR CAN THEY BE TREATED AS BANKING COMPANIES. THE ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT BY THE SOCIETY CANNOT BE REGARDED TO BE BANKING ACTIVITIE S AS CONTEMPLATED UNDER THE BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949. RELIANCE WAS ALSO PLACED ON THE DECISION OF THE BANGALORE BENCH OF THIS TRIBUNAL IN ITA NO. 72/BANG/2013 IN THE CASE OF ITO VS. DIVYAJYOTHI CREDIT CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. FOR THE A.Y 2009 - 10 IN W HICH 4 ITA NO.217/PNJ/2013 (ASST. YEAR: 2010 - 11) IT WAS HELD THAT THE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 80P(4) ARE APPLICABLE ONLY TO CREDIT CO - OPERATIVE BANKS AND NOT TO CREDIT CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY. RELIANCE WAS ALSO PLACED ON THE DECISION OF THE PANAJI BENCH IN THE CASE OF DCIT VS. JAYALAKSHMI MAHILA VIVIDODESH AGALA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LTD. IN ITA NO. 1 TO 3/PNJ/2012 DT. 30.3.2012. RELIANCE WAS ALSO PLACED IN ACIT VS PALHAWAS PRIMARY AGRICULTURE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, 23 TAXMAN.COM 318 (DELHI), ITO VS JANKALYAN NAGRI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA LTD, 24 TAXMAN.COM 127 (PUNE). RELIANCE WAS ALSO PLACED ON THE DECISION OF PANAJI BENCH IN ITA NO. 229 & 230/PNJ/2013 IN THE CASE OF TARANI MAHILA CO - OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY, VS ITO. 2.2 THE LD. DR, ON THE OTHER HAND VEHEMENTLY CONTENDED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS A CO - OPERATIVE BANK. IN VIEW OF THE DEFINITION OF THE CO - OPERATIVE BANK GIVEN UNDER EXPLANATION TO SEC. 80P(4) THE ASSESSEE IS ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF BANKING. SEC. 80P(4) PUTS AN EMBARGO W.E.F. 1.4.2007 THAT IF A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY IS CARRYING ON BANKING BUSINESS, THE ASSESSEE WILL NOT BE ENTITLED FOR THE EXEMPTION. RELIANCE WAS PLACED ON THE DECISION OF HYDERABAD BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF THE CITIZEN CO - OPERATIVE SO CIETY VS. ADDL. CIT IN ITA NOS. 1003/HYD/2011 & 1004/HYD/2011 DT. 2.7.2012. 3 WE HAVE HEARD THE RIVAL SUBMISSIONS AND CAREFULLY CONSIDERED THE SAME ALONGWITH THE ORDER OF THE TAX AUTHORITIES BELOW AS WELL AS THE DECISIONS AND THE ENTIRE MATERIAL AND CASE LAWS REFERRED TO BEFORE US. THE QUESTION BEFORE US IS WHETHER THE ASSESSEE IS ENTITLED FOR DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) AND WHETHER THE ASSESSEE IS HIT BY THE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 80P(4) WHICH WAS INTRODUCED IN THE STATUTE BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2006 W.E.F. 1.4 .2007. THE RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF BOTH THE SECTIONS ARE RE - PRODUCED FOR OUR READY REFERENCE AS UNDER : - 5 ITA NO.217/PNJ/2013 (ASST. YEAR: 2010 - 11) 80P. (1) WHERE, IN THE CASE OF AN ASSESSEE BEING A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY, THE GROSS TOTAL INCOME INCLUDES ANY INCOME REFERRED TO IN SUB - SECTION (2), T HERE SHALL BE DEDUCTED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION, THE SUMS SPECIFIED IN SUB - SECTION (2), IN COMPUTING THE TOTAL INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE. (2) THE SUMS REFERRED TO IN SUB - SECTION (1) SHALL BE THE FOLLOWING, NAMELY : (A) IN THE CASE OF A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY ENGAGED IN (I) CARRYING ON THE BUSINESS OF BANKING OR PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS, OR THE WHOLE OF THE AMOUNT OF PROFITS AND GAINS OF BUSINESS ATTRIBUTABLE TO ANY ONE OR MORE OF SUCH ACTIV ITIES. 80P(4) THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY IN RELATION TO ANY CO - OPERATIVE BANK OTHER THAN A PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY OR A PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK. EXPLANATION. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS S UB - SECTION, (A) 'CO - OPERATIVE BANK' AND 'PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY' SHALL HAVE THE MEANINGS RESPECTIVELY ASSIGNED TO THEM IN PART V OF THE BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949 (10 OF 1949); (B) 'PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK' MEANS A SOCIETY HAVING ITS AREA OF OPERATION CONFINED TO A TALUK A AND THE PRINCIPAL OBJECT OF WHICH IS TO PROVIDE FOR LONG - TERM CREDIT FOR AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. 3.1 FROM THE PLAIN READING OF SEC. 80P(2)(A)(I ) IT IS APPARENT THAT IF THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY IS ENGAGED IN CARRYING OF BUSINESS OF BANKING OR PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS, THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY IS ENTITLED FOR DEDUCTION ON WHOLE OF THE INCOME RELATING TO ANY ONE OR MORE OF SUCH BUS INESS. FROM THE READING OF SEC. 80P(4) IT IS APPARENT THAT THIS SECTION DENIES DEDUCTION TO A CO - OPERATIVE BANK OTHER THAN A PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY OR PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK. THE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 80P(4 ) WAS INTRODUCED IN THE STATUTE BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2006 W.E.F. 1.4.2007. THE EXPLANATION TO THE SECTION DEFINES THE CO - OPERATIVE BANK AND PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY TO HAVE THE SAME MEANING AS ASSIGNED TO THEM IN PART - V OF THE BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949. IT IS NOT THE CASE OF EITHER OF THE PARTIES THAT THE ASSESSEE IS A PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT 6 ITA NO.217/PNJ/2013 (ASST. YEAR: 2010 - 11) BANK. IT IS ALSO NOT THE CLAIM OF THE ASSESSEE THAT ASSESSEE IS A PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY. IF WE READ BOTH THE SECTIONS, SEC. 80P(2)(A)(I) AND SEC. 80P(4) TOGETHER, WE FIND THAT THE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 80P(4) MANDATES THAT THE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 80P WILL NOT APPLY TO ANY CO - OPERATIVE BANK OTHER THAN A PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY OR PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK BUT AS PER THE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 80P(2)(A)(I), A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY ENGAGED IN CARRYING ON THE BUSINESS OF BANKING OR PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS IS ENTITLED FOR DEDUCTION. AFTER THE INSERTION OF S EC. 80P(4), THE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 80P(2)(A)(I) WERE NOT AMENDED, RATHER THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY ENGAGED IN CARRYING ON BUSINESS OF BANKING FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS CONTINUED TO BE ENTITLED FOR DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I). THIS PRE - SUPPOSES THAT EVERY CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY ENGAGED IN CARRYING ON BUSINESS OF BANKING CANNOT BE REGARDED TO BE A CO - OPERATIVE BANK. THE EMBARGO PUT U/S 80P(4) ARE APPLICABLE ONLY TO A CO - OPERATIVE BANK. IN OUR OPINION, IT CANNOT BE SAID THAT A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY CANNOT CARRY ON BUSINESS OF BANKING FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS EVEN IF IT IS NOT A CO - OPERATIVE BANK. IF WE READ THE PROVISIONS IN THE MANNER THAT EVERY CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY ENGAGED IN CARRYING ON BUSINESS OF BANKING EVEN FOR ITS MEMBERS IS REGARDED TO BE A CO - OPERATIV E BANK, THEN, THE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 80P(2)(A)(I) WILL BECOME REDUNDANT. THEREFORE, IN OUR OPINION, BEFORE DECIDING THE ISSUE WHETHER THE ASSESSEE IS ENTITLED FOR DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I), IT IS ESSENTIAL TO DECIDE WHETHER THE ASSESSEE IS A CO - OPERATIVE BANK OTHER THAN A PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY OR A PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK. IN CASE IT IS FOUND THAT THE ASSESSEE IS A CO - OPERATIVE BANK, THE ASSESSEE WILL NOT BE ENTITLED FOR DEDUCTION AS STIPULATED U/S 80P(2 )(A)(I) BUT IN CASE THE ASSESSEE IS NOT A CO - OPERATIVE BANK OTHER THAN A PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY OR A PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK, THE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 80P(2)(A)(I) WILL BE APPLICABLE TO THE ASSESSEE PROVIDED THE ASSESSEE IS ENGAGED IN CARRYING ON BUSINESS OF BANKING OR PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS. THIS SEC TION NOWHERE 7 ITA NO.217/PNJ/2013 (ASST. YEAR: 2010 - 11) STATES CO - OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY EXCEPT MENTIONED UNDER PROVISO 2 TO SECTION 80P WHICH IS RELEVANT FOR SUB - CLAUSE 6 OR 7. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SECTION 80P(2)(A)(I). 4. IN OUR OPINION, SEC. 80P(2)(A)(I) PROVIDES TWO TYPES OF ACTIVITIES IN WHICH THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY MUST BE ENGAGED TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SUB - CLAUSE (I). THESE TWO ACTIVITIES ARE NOT ALTERNA TE S ONES BECAUSE THE SECTION ALLOWS DEDUCTION TO THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY ON THE WHOLE OF PROFITS AND GAINS OF BUSINESS ATTRIBUTABLE TO ANY ONE OR MORE OF SUCH ACTIVITIES. THIS PRE - SUPPOSES THAT ELIGIBLE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY CAN CARRY ON EITHER ONE OF THE SE TWO BUSINESSES OR CAN CARRY BOTH THESE BUSINESSES FOR THE MEMBERS. IF THE ASSESSEE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY CARRIES ON ONE OR BOTH OF THE ACTIVITIES, IT WILL BE ELIGIBLE FOR DEDUCTION. THESE TWO ACTIVITIES ARE (A) CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY ENGAGED IN CARRYING O N BUSINESS OF BANKING FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS OR (B) CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY ENGAGED IN PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS. BOTH THE ACTIVITIES MUST BE CARRIED ON BY THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY FOR ITS MEMBERS. IF A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY IS ENGAGED IN CARRYING ON THESE ACTIVITIES/FACILITIES FOR THE PERSONS OTHER THAN ITS MEMBERS, THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY, IN OUR OPINION, WILL NOT BE ELIGIBLE FOR DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) ON THE INCOME WHICH IT DERIVES FROM CARRYING ON THE ACTIVITIES NOT RELATING TO IT S MEMBERS. THEREFORE, WHERE A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY IS ENGAGED IN CARRYING ON BUSINESS OF BANKING FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS AND TO THE PUBLIC OR PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS OR TO THE PUBLIC, THE INCOME WHICH RELATES TO THE BUSINESS OF BANKIN G FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS OR PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS WILL ONLY BE ELIGIBLE FOR DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I). THERE IS NO PROHIBITION U/S 80P NOT TO ALLOW DEDUCTION TO SUCH CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES IN RESPECT OF BUSINESS RELATING TO ITS ME MBERS. 8 ITA NO.217/PNJ/2013 (ASST. YEAR: 2010 - 11) 4.1 . NOW, THE QUESTION BEFORE US IS WHETHER THE ASSESSEE IS A CO - OPERATIVE BANK OR NOT. CO - OPERATIVE BANK IS DEFINED IN PART V OF THE BANKING REGULATIONS ACT, 1949 AS UNDER : - CO - OPERATIVE BANK MEANS A STATE CO - OPERATIVE BANK, A CENTRAL CO - OPERATIVE BANK AND A PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE BANK: 5. FROM THE DEFINITION OF CO - OPERATIVE BANK IT IS APPARENT THAT CO - OPERATIVE BANK MEANS STATE CO - OPERATIVE BANK, A CENTRAL CO - OPERATIVE BANK AND A PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE BANK. IT IS NOT THE CASE OF THE REVENUE THAT THE ASSESSEE IS A STATE CO - OPERATIVE BANK OR CENTRAL CO - OPERATIVE BANK. WE HAVE THEREFORE TO FIND WHETHER THE ASSESSEE IS A PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE BANK. 6. THE PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE BANK IS DEFINED UNDER SECTION 5 CLAUSE (CCV) OF BANKING REGUL ATION ACT 1949 AS UNDER: - (CCV) PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE BANK MEANS A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY, OTHER THAN A PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY - (1) THE PRIMARY OBJECT OR PRINCIPAL BUSINESS OF WHICH IS TRANSACTION OF BANKING BUSINESS: (2) THE PAID - UP SHARE C APITAL AND RESERVES OF WHICH ARE NOT LESS THAN ONE LAKH OF RUPEES: AND (3) THE BYE - LAWS OF WHICH DO NOT PERMIT ADMISSION OF ANY OTHER CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY AS A MEMBER: PROVIDED THAT THIS SUB - CLAUSE SHALL NOT APPLY TO THE ADMISSION OF A CO - OPERATIVE BANK AS A MEMBER BY REASON OF SUCH CO - OPERATIVE BANK SUBSCRIBING TO THE SHARE CAPITAL OF SUCH CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY OUT OF FUNDS PROVIDED BY THE STATE GOVERNMENT FOR THE PURPOSE 7. FROM THE AFORESAID DEFINITION, IT IS APPARENT THAT IF THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY COMPLIED WITH ALL THE THREE CONDITIONS; FIRSTLY THAT THE PRIMARY OBJECT OR PRINCIPLE BUSINESS TRANSACTED BY IT IS A BANKING BUSINESS, SECONDLY, THE PAID UP SHARE CAPITAL AND RES ERVE OF WHICH ARE 1 LAKH OR MORE AND THIRDLY, BY LAWS OF THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY DO NOT PERMIT ADMISSION OF ANY OTHER CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY AS A MEMBER, IT WILL BE REGARDED TO BE PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE BANK. IF CO - 9 ITA NO.217/PNJ/2013 (ASST. YEAR: 2010 - 11) OPERATIVE SOCIETY DOES NOT FULFIL ANY OF TH E CONDITIONS, IT CANNOT BE REGARDED TO BE A PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE BANK. THEREFORE, IN THE CASE OF THE ASSESSEE WE HAVE TO EXAMINE ON THE BASIS OF THE FACTS AND MATERIALS ON RECORD WHETHER THE ASSESSEE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY COMPLIES WITH ALL THE THREE CONDIT IONS. IN CASE, IT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH ALL THE THREE CONDITIONS, IT CANNOT BE REGARDED TO BE A CO - OPERATIVE BANK AND THE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 80P(4), IN OUR OPINION, WILL NOT BE APPLICABLE IN THE CASE OF THE ASSESSEE. ONCE, THE ASSESSEE WILL NOT FALL WITHI N THE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 80P(4), THE ASSESSEE, IN OUR OPINION, WILL BE ELIGIBLE TO GET DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) IN RESPECT OF WHOLE OF THE INCOME WHICH THE ASSESSEE DERIVES FROM CARRYING ON THE BUSINESS OF BANKING OR PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS ME MBERS. 8. WHETHER CONDITION NO. 1 IS APPLICABLE IN THE CASE OF THE ASSESSEE, FOR THIS WE HAVE TO LOOK INTO THE BYE - LAWS OF THE ASSESSEE. THE OBJECTS OF THE ASSESSEE IN THIS CASE ARE ENUMERATED AS UNDER : - I. TO OPTIMUM SELF HELP AND ENCOURAGE THE MEMB ERS OF THE CO - OPERATIVE AND DEPOSIT HOLDERS TO INCULCATE THE C O - OPERATIVE NESS . II. TO MAKE ARRANGEMENT TO PROVIDE LOANS AND ADVANCES TO MEET THE VARIED NEEDS OF THE MEMBERS . III . TO MAKE AWARENESS OF THE SAVINGS SCHEMES OF THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT AND GOVERNMENT AMONG THE MEMBERS AND TO MAKE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS TO PROVIDE SUCH SERVICES . IV . TO PURCHASE, SALE AND COLLECT THE GOVERNMENT SECURITIES ON BEHALF OF THE MEMBERS . V . TO ENTER INTO ANY AGREEMENTS WITH ANY FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS TO HELP THE BUS INESS OF THE CO - OPERATIVE. VI . TO COLLECT AND FORWARD CASH AND SECURITIES ON BEHALF OF THE MEMBERS . VII . TO PROVIDE CREDIT SERVICES AND FACILITIES EXCEPT PROVIDING THE PRINTED CHEQUES AND RECEIVING BACK THE MONEY THROUGH THE CHEQUES . VIII . IN ORDER TO FACILITATE THE BUSINESS OF THE CO - OPERATIVE PROCURING PLOTS AND BUILDINGS, PURCHASING BUILDINGS, CONSTRUCTING BUILDING AND TO CARRY OUT THE ACTIVITIES . XI TO PROVIDE CREDIT LOANS OR HYPOTHECATION LOANS TO THE MEMBERS FOR BUYING VEHICLES AS PRESCRIBED U NDER THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT AND FOR PROCURE THE PLANT AND MACHINERIES . 10 ITA NO.217/PNJ/2013 (ASST. YEAR: 2010 - 11) X . WHEREVER NECESSARY, BY TAKING THE PERMISSION OF G ENERAL M EETING, OPENING UP OF B RANCHES, S UB - B RANCHES, EXTENSION COUNTER OR ANY OFFICE BY WHATEVER NAME CALLED ETC. AND TO FRAME THE RULES AND REGULATIONS THEREOF FOR SMOOTHENING THE BUSINESS . XI . F OR THE BENEFIT OF STAFF AND MEMBERS, ESTABLISHING THE FUND OUT OF NET PROFIT OR PROVIDING ASSISTANCE, AS AUTHENTICATED BY THE COMMON SET OF RULES FRAMED BY THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. XII . TO SET UP RESERVE FUNDS FOR EDUCATION OF THE MEMBERS OR CHILDREN OF MEMBERS WHICH SHALL BE WITHIN THE LIMITS AS FRAMED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND MANDATED BY THE GENERAL MEETING . XIII . T O MAKE FUND TRANSFER AND PROVIDE REHABILITATION WITH OR TO OTHER C O - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES HAVING COMMON OBJECTIVES, BASED ON THE PHILOSOPHY OF CO - OPERATIVE AND IN ACCORDANCE GUIDELINES ISSUED BY THE FEDERATION OF CO - OPERATIVE . XIV TO ATTACH AND REALIZE ANY OF THE PROPERTY OR PROPERTIES THAT COME IN THE POSSESSION OF CO - OPE RATIVE TO RECOVER PARTLY OR FULL DUES . XV IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE C O - OPERATIVE , CONSTITUTING THE UNION AND TO ESTABLISH CO - BUSINESS, PARTNERSHIP FIRMS AND OTHER INCIDENTAL CONCERNS WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF PROVISIONS OF THE ACT AND RULES MADE THEREUNDER . ON THE BASIS OF THESE OBJECTS WHETHER IT CAN BE SAID THAT THE PRIMARY OBJECT OR PRINCIPAL BUSINESS OF THE ASSESSEE IS TRANSACTION OF BANKING BUSINESS? BANKING BUSINESS HAS BEEN DEFINED U/S 5(B) OF THE BANKING REGULATION ACT IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER : ' BAN KING' MEANS THE ACCEPTING, FOR THE PURPOSE OF LENDING OR INVESTMENT, OF DEPOSITS OF MONEY FROM THE PUBLIC , REPAYABLE ON DEMAND OR OTHERWISE, AND WITHDRAWABLE BY CHEQUE, DRAFT, ORDER OR OTHERWISE . FROM THE SAID DEFINITION IT IS CLEAR THAT BANKING MEANS AC CEPTING DEPOSIT OF MONEY FROM THE PUBLIC WHICH IS REPAYABLE ON DEMAND OR OTHERWISE AND WITHDRAWAL OF THESE DEPOSITS BY CHEQUE, DRAFT, ORDER OR OTHERWISE AND THESE DEPOSITS ARE ACCEPTED FOR THE PURPOSE OF LENDING OR INVESTMENT. THESE DEPOSITS MUST BE ACCEP TED FROM THE PUBLIC, NOT ONLY FROM THE MEMBERS. THESE DEPOSITS MUST BE REPAYABLE ON DEMAND OR OTHERWISE AND COULD BE WITHDRAWN BY THE DEPOSITOR BY CHEQUE, DRAFT OR OTHERWISE. WE NOTED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS CATEGORICALLY ACCEPTED BEFORE THE AUTHORITIES BEL OW THAT THE ASSESSEE WAS ACCEPTING DEPOSITS OF MONEY NOT ONLY FROM THE MEMBERS BUT ALSO FROM THE 11 ITA NO.217/PNJ/2013 (ASST. YEAR: 2010 - 11) GENER AL PUBLIC WHO ARE NON - MEMBERS. THIS FACT IS CLEAR AS PER THE REMAND REPORT OF A.O DATED 27.2.2013 BEFORE THE CIT(A) CONFIRMS FROM THE FOLLOWING : - OUR SO CIETY ACCEPTS DEPOSITS FROM REGULAR MEMBERS HAVING VOTING RIGHTS AND ASSOCIATE MEMBERS AND NOMINAL MEMBERS HAVING NO VOTING RIGHTS AND ALSO ACCEPTS DEPOSITS FROM GENERAL PUBLIC . THE DEPOSITS SO ACCEPTED ARE USED BY THE ASSESSEE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY FOR L ENDING OR INVESTMENT. THIS FACT HAS NOT BEEN DENIED BY THE ASSESSEE OR BY HIS COUNSEL IN THE WRITTEN SUBMISSION MADE BEFORE US . WE HAVE ALSO NOTED FROM CHAPTER 9 OF THE BYE - LAWS WHICH DEALS WITH THE TRANSACTION WITHIN ALL MEMBERS. B YE - LAWS 42 THEREIN PERMITS THE SOCIETY TO ADVANCE VARIOUS LOANS TO NON - MEMBERS. THIS RULE DOES NOT RESTRICT THE ACTIVITIES FOR PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO THE MEMBERS ONLY. EVEN OUT OF THE DEPOSITS SO RECEIVED, THE LOANS HAVE BEEN GIVEN TO THE MEMBERS OF THE SOCIETY IN AC CORDANCE WITH THE OBJECTS AS ENUMERATED ABOVE. THUS, IN OUR OPINION, CONDITION NO. 1 STANDS SATISFIED AND IT CANNOT BE SAID THAT THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY WAS NOT CARRYING ON BANKING BUSINESS AS IT WAS ACCEPTING DEPOSITS FROM THE PERSONS WHO WERE NOT MEMBERS. IN THE SUBMISSION THE AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE TOOK THE PLEA THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT OBTAINED BANKING LICENCE. IN OUR OPINION IT IS NOT NECESSARY THAT THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY SHOULD HAVE A BANKING LICENCE AS PER THE DEFINITION UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT FOR CARRYING ON BANKING BUSINESS . IF LICENCE IS NOT OBTAINED IT MAY BE AN ILLEGAL BANKING BUSINESS UNDER THE OTHER STATUTE . WHAT WE HAVE TO SEE WHETHER THE NATURE OF THE BUSINESS CARRYING ON BY THE ASSESSEE IS A BANKING BUSINESS OR NOT. THE INCOME TAX IN OUR OPINION IS NOT CONCERNED WHETHER THE BANKING BUSINESS CARRIED ON BY THE ASSESSEE IS LEGAL OR ILLEGAL. THE INCOME HAS TO BE ASSESSED U/S 14 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT UNDER THE SAME HEAD EVEN IF THE NATURE OF THE BUSINESS IS ILLEGAL. IF WE LOOK INTO CHAPTER III OF THE BYE - LAWS WHICH CONSISTS OF FUND OF THE SOCIETY, WE NOTED THAT THE TYPES OF THE DEPOSITS WHICH THE ASSESSEE HAS ACCEPTED AS PER BYE - LAWS 7 ARE THE SAME AS ARE BEING ACCEPTED DURING THE COURSE OF THE CARRYING OUT THE BANKING ACTIVITIES. 12 ITA NO.217/PNJ/2013 (ASST. YEAR: 2010 - 11) SO FAR AS THE SECOND CONDITION IS CONCERNED, THERE IS NO DISPUTE THAT THE PAID UP SHARE CAPITAL AND RESERVES IN THE CASE OF THE ASSESSEE IS MORE THAN RS. 1 LAC. THEREFORE, THE ASSESSEE SATISFIES THE SECOND CONDITION. . SO FAR AS THE THIRD CONDITION IS CONCERNED, WE NOTED THAT SEC. 20 OF THE KARNATAKA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI ACT, 1997 PERMITS ADMISSION OF ANY OTHER CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY AS A MEMBER. THE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 20 ARE LAID DOWN AS UNDER : 20. PERSONS WHO MAY BE ADMITTED OR CONTINUED AS MEMBERS : - (1) SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ACT, NO PERSON SHALL BE ADMITTED AS A MEMBER OF A CO - OPERATIVE, - A) UNLESS HE NEEDS THE SERVICES OF THE CO - OPERATIVE AND ACCEPTS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF MEMBERSHIP AND IS COMPETENT TO CONTRACT UNDER THE CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (CENTRAL ACT IX OF 1872); B) IF HE CONDUCTS ANY BUSINESS, SUCH BUSINESS BEING IN CONFLICT OR COMPETITION WITH THE BUSINESS OF THE CO - OPERATIVE AS SPECIFIED IN THE BYE - LAWS; AND C) UNLESS HE FULFILS SUCH OTHER CONDITIONS AS MAY BE SPECIFIED IN THE BYE - LAWS OF THE CO - OPERATIVE: PROVIDED THAT AFTER THE REGISTRATION OF A CO - OPERATIVE, THE MEMBERS SHALL BE ADMITTED ON LY BY THE ELECTED BOARD. (2) NO PERSON SHALL BE ELIGIBLE TO CONTINUE AS A MEMBER IF SUCH PERSON , - A) HAS NOT USED THE SERVICES OF THE CO - OPERATIVE FOR TWO CONSECUTIVE YEARS TO THE MINIMUM LEVEL SPECIFIED IN THE BYE - LAWS; OR B) HAS NOT ATTENDED THREE CONSE CUTIVE GENERAL MEETINGS OF THE CO - OPERATIVE AND SUCH ABSENCE HAS NOT RECEIVED THE CONSENT OF THE GENERAL BODY; OR C) IS IN DEFAULT REGARDING ANY PAYMENT TO BE MADE TO THE CO - OPERATIVE EXCEEDING AN AMOUNT AND FOR A PERIOD SPECIFIED IN THE BYE - LAWS. (3) IF A QUESTION ARISES AS TO THE ELIGIBILITY OR OTHERWISE OF A PERSON TO BECOME A MEMBER OR TO CONTINUE AS A MEMBER, THE BOARD SHALL DECIDE THE QUESTION AFTER GIVING SUCH PERSON AN OPPORTUNITY OF BEING HEARD. THE DECISION OF THE BOARD SHALL BE FINAL. 21. REMO VAL OF MEMBERSHIP. - (1) THE BOARD MAY, BY A RESOLUTION PASSED BY A MAJORITY OF NOT LESS THAN TWO THIRDS OF THE MEMBERS PRESENT AND VOTING, REMOVE THE MEMBERSHIP OF A PERSON IN THE CO - OPERATIVE FOR ACTS OR OMISSIONS WHICH ARE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTEREST OF T HE CO - OPERATIVE: PROVIDED THAT A MEMBER SHALL NOT BE REMOVED UNLESS A REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY OF MAKING - REPRESENTATION IN THIS REGARD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO HIM. (2) WHERE A MEMBER HAS BEEN REMOVED BY THE BOARD, AN APPEAL SHALL LIE TO THE GENERAL BODY A ND THE DECISION OF THE GENERAL BODY SHALL BE FINAL. (3)A PERSON WHOSE MEMBERSHIP HAS BEEN REMOVED SHALL, SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ACT, RULES AND BYE - LAWS, BE INELIGIBLE FOR RE - ADMISSION AS A MEMBER OF THAT CO - OPERATIVE FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AF TER THE DATE OF SUCH REMOVAL. 13 ITA NO.217/PNJ/2013 (ASST. YEAR: 2010 - 11) [(4) NOTWITHSTANDING SUCH REMOVAL, A PAST MEMBER SHALL BE LIABLE TO BE PROCEEDED AGAINST, UNDER THIS ACT OR THE RULES OR THE BYE - LAWS FOR HIS ACTS OF COMMISSION OR OMISSION AS SUCH MEMBER] [21.A NOMINAL AND ASSOCIATE MEMB ERS (1) NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING CONTAINED IN SECTION 20, A CO - OPERATIVE MAY ADMIT, A) ANY INDIVIDUAL B) ANY FIRM, COMPANY, CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY, CO - OPERATIVE OR ANYBODY OR CORPORATION CONSTITUTED BY OR UNDER ANY LAW FOR THE TIME BEING IN FORCE: - AS A NOMINAL OR ASSOCIATE MEMBER FOR ANY SPECIFIC PURPOSE FOR ANY SPECIFIC PERIOD AS MAY BE MENTIONED IN THE BYE - LAWS. (2) A NOMINAL MEMBERS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO ANY SHARE IN ANY FORM WHATSOEVER IN THE ASSETS OR PROFITS OF THE CO - OPERATIVE AND SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO BECOME AN OFFICE - BEARER OF THE CO - OPERATIVE. (3) AN ASSOCIATE MEMBER MAY HOLD SHARES BUT SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO BECOME AN OFFICER - BEARER OF THE CO - OPERATIVE. (4) A NOMINAL OR ASSOCIATE MEMBER SHALL NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE MANAGEMENT AND TO VOTE AT ANY MEETINGS OF THE CO - OPERATIVE INCLUDING THE ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF THE CO - OPERATIVE. (5) SAVE AS PROVIDED IN THIS SECTION, A NOMINAL OR ASSOCIATE MEMBER SHALL HAVE SUCH PRIVILEGES AND RIGHTS OF A MEMBER AND BE SUBJECT TO SUCH LIABILITIES OF A MEMBER AS MAY BE SPECIFIED IN THE BYE - LAWS OF THE CO - OPERATIVE. THE AFORESAID PROVISION OF SEC. 20 TO 21A MANDATES ADMISSION OF ANY OTHER CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY AS A MEMBER OF THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY. THE WORD USED IN SEC.21A IS MAY. SECTION 21A FURTHER STATES THAT THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY CAN BE ADMITTED AS NOMINAL OR ASSOCIATE MEMBER FOR ANY SPECIFIC PURPOSE FOR ANY SPECIFIC PERIOD AS MAY BE MENTIONED IN THE BYE - LAWS. THIS CLEARLY PROVES THAT IN CASE THE RULES AND BYE - LAWS O F THE OTHER CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY PROVIDES OTHERWISE, THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY MAY NOT BE ADMITTED AS A MEMBER OF THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY. 9. WE HAVE GONE THROUGH THE BYE - LAWS WHICH CONTAINS THE MEMBERSHIP WHICH IS BYE - LAWS NO. 6 . IT STATES AS UNDER : - 6 . ADMISSION TO MEMBERSHIP : F OLLOWING ARE QUALIFIED TO BE THE MEMBER S OF THE CO - OPERATIVE : 14 ITA NO.217/PNJ/2013 (ASST. YEAR: 2010 - 11) 1. (A) A P ERSON RESIDING WITHIN THE LIMITS OF AREA OF OPERATIONS OF COOPERATIVE OR HAVING BUSINESS OR INDUSTRY WITHIN SUCH LIMITS OF CO - OPERATIVE, WHO HAS ATTAINED THE AGE OF 18 YEARS , NOT BEING INSOLVENT AND UNSOUND MIND . (B) P ROPRIETARY CONCERN OR PARTNERSHIP FIRM/S OR SOCIET Y REGISTERED UNDER KARNATAKA SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT (KARNATAKA 1960, SECTION 17). ( C) .................................................. FROM THIS, IT IS APPARENT THAT THE BYE - LAWS OF SOCIETY PERMIT S THE ADMISSION OF ANY OTHER CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY AS MEMBER. THUS THE THIRD CONDITION FOR BECOMING PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE BANK IS ALSO NOT COMPLIED WITH. SINCE THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY DOES NOT COMPLY WITH ALL THE THREE CONDITIONS , THEREFORE , IN OUR OPINION THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY DOES NOT BECOME A PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE BANK AND IN VIEW OF EXPLANATION (A) OF SECTION 80P(4) IT HAS NOT TO BE REGARD ED AS A CO - OPERATIVE BANK AND IS NOT HIT BY SECTION 80P(4). 10. WE HAVE GONE THROUGH THE DECISION OF THE HYDERABAD BENCH OF THIS TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF THE CITIZEN COOPERATIVE SOCIETY VS. ADDL. CIT ( SUPRA ). WE NOTED THAT THIS DECISION IS NOT APPLICABLE TO THE FACTS OF THE CASE BEFORE US. IN THIS DECISION, UNDER PARA 23 THE TRIBUNAL HAS GIVEN A FINDING THAT THE ASSESSEE IS CARRYING ON BANKING BUSINESS AND FOR ALL PRACTICAL PURPOSES IT ACTS LIKE A CO - OPERATIVE BANK. THE SOCIETY IS GOVERNED BY THE BANKIN G REGULATIONS ACT. THEREFORE, THE SOCIETY BEING A CO - OPERATIVE BANK PROVIDING BANKING FACILITIES TO MEMBERS IS NOT ELIGIBLE TO CLAIM DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) AFTER THE INTRODUCTION OF SUB - SECTION (4) TO SECTION 80P. IN VIEW OF THIS FINDING, THE ASSESSE E WAS DENIED DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I). WE HAVE ALSO GONE THROUGH THE DECISION OF THE BANGALORE BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF ITO VS. DIVYAJYOTHI CREDIT CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. ( SUPRA ) IN ITA NO. 72/BANG/2013. IN THIS CASE, WE NOTED THAT THE HO N'BLE TRIBUNAL CONFIRMED THE ORDER OF CIT(A) FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF ACIT, CIRCLE 3(1), BANGALORE VS. M/S. BANGALORE COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT CREDIT CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. IN ITA NO. 1069/BANG/2010 HOLDING THAT SEC. 80P(2)(A)(I ) IS APPLICABLE ONLY TO CREDIT CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY A AND NOT TO CO - OPERATIVE BANK. 15 ITA NO.217/PNJ/2013 (ASST. YEAR: 2010 - 11) WITH DUE REGARDS TO THE BENCH, WE ARE UNABLE TO FIND ANY TERM CREDIT CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) OR U/S 80P(4), THEREFORE, THIS DECISION CANNOT ASSIST US. WE NOTED THAT THE HON'BLE GUJARAT HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. JAFARI MOMIN VIKAS CO - OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. IN TAX APPEALS NO. 442 OF 2013, 443 OF 2013 AND 863 OF 2013 ( SUPRA ) VIDE ORDER DT. 15.1.2014 TOOK THE VIEW THAT SEC. 80P(4) WILL NOT APPLY TO A S OCIETY WHICH IS NOT A CO - OPERATIVE BANK. IN THE CASE OF VYAVASAYA SEVA SAHAKARA SANGHA VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. ( SUPRA) WE NOTED THAT THE ISSUE BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN THE WRIT PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER RELATED TO THE LEGISLATIVE COMP ETENCE OF THE STATE LEGISLATURE FOR ISSUING A CIRCULAR. THE ISSUE DOES NOT RELATE TO THE CLAIM OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I). WHILE DEALING WITH THIS ISSUE, THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT UNDER PARA 12 OBSERVED AS UNDER : - 12. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO ACCEPT THIS CONTENTION. THE PETITIONERS ARE NOT THE BANKING INSTITUTIONS COMING UNDER THE PURVIEW OF THE BANKING REGULATION ACT. THEY ARE THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES REGISTERED UNDER THE ACT, AND AS SUCH THEY ARE GOVERNED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT PASSED BY THE S TATE LEGISLATURE. CONSEQUENTLY, THE STATE GOVERNMENT HAS CONTROL OVER THEM TO THE EXTENT THE ACT PERMITS. MAJOR ACTIVITIES OF THE PETITIONERS ARE TO FINANCE ITS MEMBERS. FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING ITS MEMBERS, THEY BORROW MONEY FROM THE FINANCING AGEN CIES AND REPAY THE SAME. MERELY BECAUSE THE PETITIONERS - THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES IN QUESTION - ARE REQUIRED TO ADVANCE LOANS TO THEIR MEMBERS, THEY DO NOT CEASE TO BE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES GOVERNED BY THE ACT NOR CAN THEY BE TREATED AS BANKING COMPANIES. IT IS ALSO NOT POSSIBLE TO HOLD THAT THESE ACTIVITIES OF THE PETITIONERS AMOUNT TO BANKING AS CONTEMPLATED UNDER THE BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949, INASMUCH AS THESE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ARE NOT ESTABLISHED FOR THE PURPOSE OF DOING BANKING AS DEFINE D IN SECTION 5(B) OF THE BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949. THIS DECISION, IN OUR OPINION, IS NOT APPLICABLE TO THE CASE BEFORE US BECAUSE THE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 80P(2)(A)(I), AS WE HAVE ALREADY HELD IN THE PRECEDING PARAGRAPHS, ARE APPLICABLE TO A CO - OPERATI VE SOCIETY WHICH IS ENGAGED IN CARRYING ON BANKING BUSINESS FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS IF IT IS NOT A CO - OPERATIVE BANK. WE HAVE ALSO GONE THROUGH THE DECISION OF THIS BENCH IN THE CASE OF DCIT VS. JAYALAKSHMI MAHILA VIVIDODESHAGALA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LTD. 16 ITA NO.217/PNJ/2013 (ASST. YEAR: 2010 - 11) I N ITA NO. 1 TO 3/PNJ/2012 DT. 30.3.2012 ( SUPRA), FOR WHICH THE UNDERSIGNED IS THE AUTHOR. WHILE DISCUSSING THIS ISSUE, AFTER ANALYSING THE AIMS AND OBJECTS OF THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY UNDER PARA 12 OF ITS ORDER, THIS TRIBUNAL HAS HELD AS UNDER : - 12. FROM THE AFORESAID OBJECTS, IT IS APPARENT THAT NONE OF THE AIMS AND OBJECTS ALLOWS THE ASSESSEE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY TO ACCEPT DEPOSITS OF MONEY FROM PUBLIC FOR THE PURPOSE OF LENDING OR INVESTMENT. IN OUR OPINION UNTIL AND UNLESS THAT CONDITION IS SATISF IED, IT CANNOT BE SAID THAT THE PRIME OBJECT OR PRINCIPAL BUSINESS OF THE ASSESSEE IS BANKING BUSINESS. THEREFORE, THE ASSESSEE WILL NOT COMPLY WITH THE FIRST CONDITION AS LAID DOWN IN THE DEFINITION AS GIVEN U/S. 5(CCV) OF THE BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1959 FOR BECOMING PRIMARY COOPERATIVE BANK. THE ASSESSEE, THEREFORE, CANNOT BE REGARDED TO BE PRIMARY COOPERATIVE BANK AND IN CONSEQUENCE THEREOF, IT CANNOT BE A CO - OPERATIVE BANK AS DEFINED UNDER PART V OF THE BANKING REGULATION ACT 1949. ACCORDINGLY, IN OU R OPINION THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 80P (4) READ WITH EXPLANATION THERE UNDER WILL NOT BE APPLICABLE IN THE CASE OF THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSESSEE, THEREFORE, IN OUR OPINION WILL BE ENTITLED FOR THE DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I). WE ACCORDINGLY CONFIRM THE ORDER OF CIT(A) ALLOWING DEDUCTION TO THE ASSESSEE. WE HAVE ALSO GONE THROUGH THE DECISION OF ACIT VS PALHAWAS PRIMARY AGRICULTURE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, 23 TAXMAN.COM 318 (DELHI). SECTION 80P(4) CLEARLY EXCLUDES PRIMARY AGRICULTURE CREDIT SOCIETY FROM ITS DOMAIN. THEREFORE THIS DECISION WILL NOT ASSIST THE ASSESSEE. WE HAVE ALSO GONE THROUGH THE DECISION OF PUNE BENCH IN THE CASE OF ITO VS JANKALYAN NAGRI SAHAKARI PAD SANSTHA LTD, 24 TAXMAN.COM 127 PUNE. THIS WE HAVE ALREADY STATED THAT SECTION 80P(2)(A) (I) NOWHERE TALKS OF CO - OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY AND THEREFORE THE DISTINCTION MADE UNDER THE BANKING REGULATION ACT CANNOT BE IMPORTED U/S 80P(2)(A)(I). THIS DECISION IN OUR OPINION WILL NOT ASSIST THE ASSESSEE. WE HAVE ALSO GONE THROUGH THE DECISION OF T ARANI MAHILA CO - OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD TO WHICH THE UNDERSIGNED IS THE AUTHOR SIMILAR FINDING AS HAS BEEN GIVEN IN THIS ARE GIVEN IN THAT CASE ALSO. 11. WE NOTED THAT IN THE CASE OF THE ASSESSEE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY IS ENGAGED IN CARRYING ON THE BU SINESS OF BANKING OR PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES NOT ONLY TO ITS MEMBERS BUT ALSO TO THE NON - MEMBERS AS IS APPARENT FROM CHAPTER 9. 17 ITA NO.217/PNJ/2013 (ASST. YEAR: 2010 - 11) SECTION 80P(2)(A)(I) ALLOWS THE DEDUCTION ONLY IN RESPECT OF THE PROFIT AND GAINS OF THE BUSINESS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE BANKIN G OR CREDIT FACILITIES PROVIDED TO ITS MEMBERS. SINCE THE ASSESSEE HAS PROVIDED THE FACILITIES TO NON - MEMBERS, THEREFORE IN OUR OPINION THE ASSESSEE CANNOT GET THE DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) ON WHOLE OF THE PROFIT AND GAINS OF THESE ACTIVITIES . T HE DEDUCTI ON HAS TO BE RESTRICTED ONLY IN RESPECT OF THE INCOME WHICH HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE BANKING OR PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS. WE THEREFORE, SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) AND RESTORE THIS ISSUE TO THE FILE OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER THAT T HE DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) BE ALLOWED TO THE ASSESSEE ONLY IN RESPECT OF INCOME WHICH IS INCLUDED IN THE TOTAL INCOME AS HAS BEEN RECEIVED BY THE ASSESSEE FROM CARRYING ON THE BUSINESS OF BANKING OR PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS. 12 . IN TH E RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. 13 . ORDER PRONOUN CED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 21 .03.2014. SD/ - SD/ - (D.T.GARASIA) JUDICIAL MEMBER (P.K. BANSAL) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER PLACE : PANAJI / GOA DATED : 21 .03.2014 *A* COPY TO : (1) APPELLANT (2) RESPONDENT (3) CIT CONCERNED (4) CIT(A) CONCERNED (5) D.R (6) GUARD FILE TRUE COPY, BY ORDER SR. PRIVATE SECRETARY ITAT, PANAJI, GOA