IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH E, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 2179/DEL/2014 AY: 2004-05 ITO, WARD 5(4), VS. M/S MODIPON LTD., HAPUR NEW DELHI ROAD, MODI NAGAR, UTTAR PRADESH-201204 (PAN: AAACM2069E) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SH. SURENDER PAL, SR. DR RESPONDENT BY : SH. SANTOSH AGGARWAL, ADV. PER H.S. SIDHU, JM ORDER THIS APPEAL BY THE DEPARTMENT IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 28.1.2014 OF LD. CIT(A)-VIII, NEW DELHI PERTAINING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05 ON THE FOLLOWING GROUNDS:- 1. WHETHER ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN LAW, THE LD. CIT(A) ERRED IN DELETING THE ADDITION TO RS . 25,39,000/- MADE BY THE AO ON ACCOUNT OF PROPORTION ATE DISALLOWANCE OUT OF EXPENSES ATTRIBUTABLE TO EXEMPT INCOME AS PER PROVISIONS OF SECTION 14A OF I.T. ACT? 2. THAT THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A) IS ERRONEOUS AN D IS NOT TENABLE OF FACTS AND IN LAW. 3. THAT THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL ARE WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO EACH OTHER. ITA NO. 2179/DEL/2014 2 4. THAT THE APPELLANT CRAVES LEAVE TO ADD, ALTER, AMEN D OR FOREGO ANY GROUND(S) OF APPEAL OR AT THE TIME OF HEARING O F THE APPEAL. 2. WE HAVE HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES AND PERUSED THE M ATERIAL ON RECORD. FROM THE ABOVE, WE FIND THAT THE TAX EFFEC T IN THE REVENUES APPEAL IS LESS THAN RS.10,00,000/-, THEREFORE, THE DEPARTMENTS APPEAL IS NOT MAINTAINABLE, IN VIEW OF THE CIRCUL AR NO. 21/2015 DATED 10 TH DECEMBER, 2015 ISSUED VIDE F.NO. 279/MISC. 142/200 7-ITJ (PT.) BY THE CBDT. FOR THE SAKE OF CONVENIENCE, THE RELE VANT PARA NOS. 3 & 10 OF THE AFORESAID CBDTS CIRCULAR ARE REPRODUCED AS UNDER:- 3. HENCEFORTH, APPEALS/ SLPS SHALL NOT BE FILED IN CASES WHERE THE TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED THE MONETARY L IMITS GIVEN HEREUNDER: S NO APPEALS IN INCOME -TAX MATTERS MONETARY LIMIT (IN RS) 1 BEFORE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 10,00,000/- 2 BEFORE HIGH COURT 20,00,000/- 3 BEFORE SUPREME COURT 25,00,000/- IT IS CLARIFIED THAT AN APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE FILED MERELY BECAUSE THE TAX EFFECT IN A CASE EXCEEDS THE MONETA RY LIMITS PRESCRIBED ABOVE. FILING OF APPEAL IN SUCH C ASES IS TO BE DECIDED ON MERITS OF THE CASE. 10. THIS INSTRUCTION WILL APPLY RETROSPECTIVELY TO PENDING APPEALS AND APPEALS TO BE FILED HENCEFORTH IN HIGH COURTS/ TRIBUNALS. PENDING APPEALS BELOW THE SPECIF IED TAX LIMITS IN PARA 3 ABOVE MAY BE WITHDRAWN/ NOT PRESSED. APPEALS BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT WILL BE ITA NO. 2179/DEL/2014 3 GOVERNED BY THE INSTRUCTIONS ON THIS SUBJECT, OPERA TIVE AT THE TIME WHEN SUCH APPEAL WAS FILED. 3. IT IS NOT IN DISPUTE THAT THE BOARDS INSTRUCTIO N OR DIRECTIONS ISSUED TO THE INCOME-TAX AUTHORITIES ARE BINDING ON THOSE AUT HORITIES, THEREFORE, THE DEPARTMENT SHOULD HAVE WITHDRAWN/ NOT PRESSED THE P RESENT APPEAL, IN VIEW OF THE AFORESAID INSTRUCTIONS SINCE THE TAX EFFECT IN THE INSTANT APPEAL IS LESS THAN THE AMOUNT OF RS. 10 LACS, PRESCRIBED IN THE A BOVE SAID CBDTS INSTRUCTIONS. 4. KEEPING IN VIEW THE CBDT INSTRUCTION NO. 21/2015 DATED 10 TH DECEMBER, 2015, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THE REVENUE SHOULD HAVE WITHDRAWN/ NOT PRESSED THE INSTANT APPEAL BEFORE TH E TRIBUNAL. WE ARE ALSO OF THE VIEW THAT THE SAID INSTRUCTIONS ARE APPLICAB LE FOR THE PENDING APPEALS AND APPEALS TO BE FILED HENCEFORTH IN TRIBUNAL. ACC ORDINGLY, THE REVENUES APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE STAND S DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 08/08/2016. SD/- SD/- (O.P. KANT) (H.S. SIDHU) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER J UDICIAL MEMBER DATED:08/08/2016 *SR BHATNAGAR* COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT TRUE COPY BY ORDER, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR