KAPIL R. GHAI, MUMBAI V. ITO WD 13(1)(1), MUMBAI

ITA 2190/MUM/2009

• Counselvise Citation: [2010] 136 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1926 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 21 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 30-04-2010
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 21-04-2010
• Assessment Year: 2005-2006
• Appeal Filed On: 08-04-2009
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SANDEEP DAHIYA

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES, A, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R V EASWAR, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI J SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I T A NO: 2190/MUM/2009 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2005-06) KAPIL R GHAI, MUMBAI APPELLANT (PAN: AAYPG4020A) VS INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 13(1)(1), MUMBAI RESPOND ENT APPELLANT BY: NONE RESPONDENT BY: SHRI SANDEEP DAHIYA O R D E R R V EASWAR, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT: NOTICE POSTING THE APPEAL FOR HEARING ON 21 ST APRIL 2010 AND SENT TO THE ASSESSEE BY RPAD TO THE ADDRESS GIVEN I N FORM NO.36, HAS NOT EVOKED ANY RESPONSE FROM THE ASSESSEE. EAR LIER WHEN THE APPEAL WAS POSTED FOR HEARING ON 9 TH FEBRUARY 2010 ALSO THERE WAS NO APPEARANCE BY THE ASSESSEE. IT IS THEREFORE INFERR ED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL WHICH IS H EREBY DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION FOLLOWING THE ORDER OF THE DELHI BE NCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD. (19 91) 38 ITD 320 (DEL). ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 30 TH APRIL 2010. SD/- SD/- (J SUDHAKAR REDDY) (R V EASWAR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SENIOR VICE PRESI DENT MUMBAI, DATED 30 TH APRIL 2010 SALDANHA 2 COPY TO: 1. KAPIL R GHAI 50, NAGDEVI STREET, 2 ND FLOOR BIBIJAN STREET, MUMBAI 400 003 2. ITO, WARD 13(1)(1) 3. CIT-13 4. CIT(A)-XIII 5. DR A BENCH TRUE COPY BY ORDER ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI