M/S. FORTUNE CREDIT CAPITAL LIMITED , MUMBAI V. DCIT, CIRCLE -(1)(2), MUMBAI

ITA 2194/MUM/2023

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 101 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9934 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 5 month(s) 8 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 23-11-2023
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Next Hearing Date: 16-10-2023
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 14-06-2023
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Income from undisclosed sources; Bad and doubtful debts
• Section: 147; 131; 68; 148; 250

Judgement Text

1 ITA 2194/Mum/2023 M/s Fortune Credit Capital Limited IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “F”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI.NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) I.T.A. No.2194/Mum/2023 (Assessment year : 2012-13) M/s Fortune Credit Capital Limited ITI House, 36, Dr. R.K. Shirodkar Marg, Parel, Mumbai-400 012 PAN : AABCF1433G Vs DCIT, Circle-1(1)(2), Mumbai APPELLANT RESPONDENT Present for the Assessee: Shri Malav P Sheth, Present for the Department: Shri Ujjawal Kumar Chavhan SR. AR Date of hearing : 17/10/2023 Date of pronouncement : 24/11/2023 O R D E R Per N.K. Choudhry (JM): This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 10/05/2023 impugned herein, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) Delhi / Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) [in short, Ld. Commissioner ] under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act) for the A.Y.2012-13. 2 ITA 2194/Mum/2023 M/s Fortune Credit Capital Limited 2. In this case, the Assessing Officer (in short “AO”) on the basis of the information received from DDIT (Inv), Mumbai to the effect “that M/s Nivyah Infrastructure and Telecom Services Ltd is a penny-sotck listed at BSE with scrip code 517534 and has been used to facilitate introduction of unaccounted income of beneficiaries in the form of exempt capital gain or short term capital loss in their books of account. The share price of the said company rose from Rs.39 on 21/07/2009 to Rs. 2,050/- on 05 th January, 2011 and dipped to Rs.47.20 on 18/07/2012. The sharp rise in the market price of this entity is not supported by financial fundamentals of the company. Both purchase and sale of share are centered within a few persons/entities. The entry providers do not have any creditworthiness. They are either non-filers or have filed nominal return of income and have not paid tax. The Assessee is one of the beneficiaries, who has traded in this scrip worth Rs.5,01,650/-“, formed the reason to believe that income chargeable to tax amounting to R.5,01,650/- has escaped assessment within the meaning of section 147 of the Act read with provisos thereto and consequently issued the notice under section 148 of the Act. 2.1 In response to notice U/s 148, the Assessee furnished its e-return of income filed on 29/04/2019 declaring total income at Rs.2,59,35,940/-. Thereafter, various statutory notices were issued. The Assessee before the Assessing Officer claimed that Shri Hemant Madhusudan Sheth, had taken loan from the Assessee and pledged shares of M/s Nivyah Infrastructure and Telecom Services Ltd for the loan availed. Since the lonee did not pay amount of loan, the share of M/s Nivyah Infrastructure and Telecom Services Ltd pledged for Rs.5,01,640/- were sold and balance amount were witten off as bad debts. 3 ITA 2194/Mum/2023 M/s Fortune Credit Capital Limited 2.2 The Assessing Officer, though considered the said explanation of the Assessee, however, not found acceptable on various reasons such as the Assessee never disclosed in the original assessment about these facts and the Assessee failed to produce said party and also did not discharge the onus cast upon it by proving the genuineness of its claim by producing the concerned party. The Assessing Officer in order to verify also issued summons under section 131 of the Act to Shri Hemant Madhusudan Sheth on 7 th October, 2019 and asked to file certain documents and to appear in person; however, Shri Hemant Madhusudan Sheth though appeared but did not produce any documents as required to be furnished as per summon under section 131 of the Act. In his statement recorded on oath before the Assessing Officer has replied to question No.4 that there is no direct transaction of any sort with the Assessee. Shri Hemant Madhusudan Sheth also not provided any document with regard to the trading in the shares of M/s Nivyah Infrastructure and Telecom Services Ltd and details of the loan account with the Assessee. Shri Hemant Madhusudan Sheth, at the later stage, in response to the summons issued under section 131 of the act on 25/10/2019, though furnished a copy of the return of income for the assessment year, as well; however, failed to furnish any copy of bank statement / passbook highlighting payments made to the Assessee and the copy of ledger account books and, therefore, by considering the peculiar facts and circumstances in totality, the Assessing Officer made the addition under section 68 of the Act to the tune of Rs.5,01,650/- which was appearing as credit in the books of the Assessee on sale of shares. 3. The Assessee being aggrieved challenged the said addition before the Ld. Commissioner and reiterated it claim as raised before the AO. The Ld. Commissioner considered the claim of the Assessee and also the fact that the Assessee did not submit the any loan transaction documents on the 4 ITA 2194/Mum/2023 M/s Fortune Credit Capital Limited basis of which the sale proceeds were received by it instead of the client. Even Shri Hemant Madhusudan Sheth did not produce any evidence with regard to the loan in the assessment proceedings, and therefore ultimately affirmed the addition by holding and determining as under:- “4.3.2. In this context, three aspects are clear :- a. Sale transaction of the shares was initiated by the appellant and sale proceeds were received by the appellant - this is not denied. b. There is no cost of acquisition for the appellant in respect of the shares sold - the. loan given and the amount of the loan is not proved. c. The appellant has not shown income from sale of shares in its return of income - not denied. Only objection by the appellant is that income did not arise in the sale of share transactions, but not even calculation is given even in appeal stage, as what is the income or loss in the transactions. Appellant has also not filed any ledger accounts in the appeal proceedings. 4.3.3. Thus, when there is receipt of sale proceeds by sale of shares by the appellant, which is not shown to tax and no evidence of loss/income actually derived by the sale is available nor the purchase cost of the shares, the entire sale proceeds become the income escaping assessment and same is rightly brought to tax by the AO.” 4. The Assessee being aggrieved is in appeal before us. 5. Heard the parties and perused the material on record. The Assessee has mainly claimed that loan was given to Shri Hemant Madhusudan Sheth, who, as a security, pledged the shares of Nivyah Infrastructure and Telecom Services Ltd and subsequently failed to repay the loan and defaulted and, therefore, the Assessee recovered the amount by selling the shares of Nivyah Infrastructure and Telecom Services Ltd and remaining amount written off as bad debts. We observe that both the authorities below specifically held that the Assessee failed to produce the loan transaction documents and documents qua shares purchase and pledging of shares of M/s Nivyah Infrastructure and Telecom Services Ltd, on the basis of which 5 ITA 2194/Mum/2023 M/s Fortune Credit Capital Limited the sale proceeds were received by the Assessee instead of Shri Hemant Madhusudan Sheth. It also clearly appears in the assessment order that Shri Hemant Madhusudan Sheth as well as the Assessee also failed to produce the documents pertaining to the alleged loan sanctioned / given. In the assessment order it is also noted that in reply to question No. 4, Shri Hemant Madhusudan Sheth stated that no direct transaction of any type with the Assessee. Therefore, prima facie it appears from observations made by the authorities below, that the Assessee failed to substantiate its case by not producing the relevant documents. However, before us, the Assessee by filling paper book filed on 11/10/2023 has placed certain documents with regard to the loan transactions and contract notes and transactions in demat statement of the Assessee and Shri Hemant Madhusudan Sheth and other documents, with certification that the same were also filed before the Assessing Officer, which infact goes contrary to determination made by AO and therefore in our view requires verification. Thus in order to resolve the controversy and for the proper decision in the case and for the ends of justice, we are inclined to set aside the orders passed by the authorities below and consequently the case is remanded to the file of AO with a direction to consider the documents, if already filed, which the Assessee claimed to has already filed before the Assessing Officer as per certificate given by the Assessee before the Tribunal, but not otherwise and to decide the case afresh. Accordingly the case is remanded to the file of AO. The Assessee is also directed to appear, if necessitates and file the documents filed before the Tribunal in the same format and other relevant documents, if any, would be needed by the Assessing Officer for proper adjudication of the case. 6 ITA 2194/Mum/2023 M/s Fortune Credit Capital Limited 6. In the result, appeal filed by the Assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open course on 24/11/2023. Sd/- sd/- (S RIFAUR RAHMAN) (NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Pavanan प्रतितिति अग्रेतििCopy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अिीिार्थी/The Appellant , 2. प्रतिवादी/ The Respondent. 3. आयकर आयुक्त CIT 4. तवभागीय प्रतितिति, आय.अिी.अति., मुबंई/DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. गार्ड फाइि/Guard file. BY ORDER, //True Copy// Asstt. Registrar / Senior Private Secretary ITAT, Mumbai